“This is just the beginning”: Alt-right rejoices as violent protests rock Berkeley

Not wanting to pay for other peoples shit isn't racist.....

No, but some people don't want government assistance and money going to certain people for racist reasons, as you know.

Trying to say that it is, and even better making it white, makes YOU the racist.

Don't see how. I am not disparaging the Tea Partiers' race, which is in nearly all cases the same as mine.
 
Last edited:
No, but some people don't want government assistance and money going to certain people for racist reasons, as you know.

Maybe all 2-3 thousand nobodies.

That's not the tea party though, The other 99% of people just don't want to have to pay for other folks shit because it's a stupid way to waste money.
 
Nope. They wanted domestic and foreign cuts. For example, originally they didn't think that the U.S. should be paying any country foreign aid (that included our allies like Israel and our enemies like Iran.) They also didn't want the U.S. military stationed in over 100 countries around the globe. They wanted other countries to step up and pay for their own defense. They also wanted to cut a lot of wasted bureaucracy from the Federal government because eventually, our massive debts would crush us.

There would be no public assistance, or anything else for that matter, if we collapse due to our debts.

Again another right wing movement that has had it's agenda hijacked. At least in the publics eye. A few fringers with racist or fundamentalist religious views and all that talk and work about conservative fiscal responsibility goes out the door.

Can't show the racist or fundy fringe to the door that would be infringing on their rights to free speech! So now the Tea Party loses half it's real power due to a few fringe elements.
 
Don't see how. I am not disparaging the Tea Partiers' race,

You tried to paint fiscal conservatism as a white racist thing.....it's an INTENTIONAL LIE that you're using to try and make fiscal conservatism = white racism.

their fiscal conservatism is probably based at least partly on perennial white-racist hostility to public funds going to help "the other,"

You could not be a bigger, more blatant or direct of a bigot.




which is in nearly all cases the same as mine.

Which is a totally irrelevant point. Lot's of white lefties out there hate white folks because they are white.

Pretty much every time they mention "White privilege" they perpetuate racial hatred toward white people based off of nothing more than feelings. It's their way of justifying their racism against white people.
 
Last edited:
You tried to paint fiscal conservatism as a white racist thing.....it's an INTENTIONAL LIE that you're using to try and make fiscal conservatism = white racism.

1. Attributing racism to someone is not racism.
2. I am saying only that some fiscal conservatism is partly based on racism, which, historically, it has been; of course there are non-racist arguments for it and non-racist fiscal conservatives.
 
1. Attributing racism to someone is not racism.

You didn't attribute racism to someone, you attributed it to white conservatives.

Because racist....


2. I am saying only that some fiscal conservatism is partly based on racism, which, historically, it has been

Oh run run run with that goal post....and no it hasn't, greed isn't white or black the very notion that it is paints you as a serious asshole at best and a complete bigot at worst.

Even historically if you were to stretch that argument, it's 2017 KO, not 1950....no matter how DESPERATELY you wish it was.

of course there are non-racist arguments for it and non-racist fiscal conservatives.

That's because greed isn't black or white, it's green and gold.
 
The left calling people they disagree with racists goes back before Trump.
You watered down the meaning of the word.

If you want to punch the people who are responsible for getting Trump elected, you should punch yourself in the face.
 
More whites are using food stamps than minorities.

http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/SNAPCharts1_1.png

As to be expected as they are by far the largest ethnic group. But blacks only make up 14% of population and yet receive 25% of benefits. Now this is a socio-economic issue not a race issue. Well not quite. All it takes is for some racist to jump on that stat and it derails the whole argument of the benefits or harm of the welfare state. You now find yourself in coming from behind.

Statistics showed in the early 1900s that once someone drops below a certain point in earnings it is impossible to escape that economic class without assistance. You then have an ever increasing poor class. Next thing you know and you have things like malnutrition and possible peasant revolutions redistributing wealth on a large scale.

Been quite a while since the west saw a peasant rebellion. The modern welfare state is the reason for that.
 
Antifa girl goes on CBS claiming she is a victim. Redditors are slamming the comments with video evidence of her throwing glass bottles and punching people with her weighted gloves. Also, turns out she is a fetish dreadlock porn model and her entire family now knows.


Goes by Venus Rosales online.
(Very hairy - you've been warned.)


Radical feminism before & after.

http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/before-after-antifa.jpg

https://www.erocurves.com/galleries/75488/3_big.jpg

https://i.redd.it/1j6ixlw5w6sy.jpg

Wearing weighted SAP gloves which are illegal in California. Holding the bottle she later tossed at someone. Such a victim. Plus, her face was covered when she got punched. Looked like the other masked rioters.
https://i.imgur.com/jPHCkPW.jpg


(From Reddit post)
She specifically stated in her facebook post that she went there to fight people. She had weighted gloves and bottles as weapons. None of the media outlets I've seen that reported this have mentioned her facebook posts declaring her intention to cause violence.
 
Last edited:
Googling "national antifa front" turns up nothing. Are you certain of who actually published that? It looks like something the alt right faked to discredit antifas.
Not really. It looks like something a teenager did in his basement.
 
No it is a responsibility to hit them. Not a right. You want to appease Nazis? Doesn't work out very well. Appeasement is wrong! Nazis and their ilk are evil. Evil must be fought with any means possible.

You do realize that actual nazis believed, just as you do that they had virtue on their side and that violence in the furtherance of virtue and to supress evil as they defined it was justified?

Throughout history, attrocities have been justified by those committing the attrocities in exactly the same manner that you're doing.

Your attitude by anyone's definition is clearly fascist. Fascist does not mean people that hate Jews plenty of people that hate Jews are Fascist the fact that you hate people that hate Jews doesn't make you any less the facist.
 
You tried to paint fiscal conservatism as a white racist thing.....it's an INTENTIONAL LIE that you're using to try and make fiscal conservatism = white racism.



You could not be a bigger, more blatant or direct of a bigot.






Which is a totally irrelevant point. Lot's of white lefties out there hate white folks because they are white.

Pretty much every time they mention "White privilege" they perpetuate racial hatred toward white people based off of nothing more than feelings. It's their way of justifying their racism against white people.

Not to mention the fact that oreo's overt racism is showing. There's the softer version where he is asserting that people of color require being propped up by Society but beyond that he's basically suggesting that anyone who needs help from the government must be a person of color.

None of which is statistically true the majority of government assistance does not go to persons of color. It goes to poor white people.
 
Back
Top