What did we learn today?

Ishmael

Literotica Guru
Joined
Nov 24, 2001
Posts
84,005
1. The CIA can categorically say that the Russian 'finger prints are all over the Hillary/DNC hacks.

2. What they CAN"T say is that the Russians did it. (Umbrage 101)

3. No member of the Obama administration will categorically say, "Trumps phones weren't bugged."

4. The Democrat mouth pieces have been noticeably absent for three days now.

5. Assange's statement that he never received any of the information he made public came from the Russians has a great deal more credibility now.

6. Trump's assertion that he was bugged is no longer in doubt, it never was. What the previous administration and their surrogates are hinging EVERYTHING on is the fine point of Obama "personally" ordering it.

Even the press is beginning to ask embarrassing questions of the democrats.

The democrats have become used to making unbased allegations re. the republicans and having the republicans immediately jump to the defense, bend over, and ask, "Can I have some more sir?" They just weren't prepared for a Trump, who fights back.....publically. They are now reduced to saying, "He's unpresidential." In whose opinion? Theirs? As if they are the final arbiter of what is presidential or not. Obviously they know fuck all of US presidential history.

With one tweet Trump changed the narrative and look who's playing defense now!

Ishmael
 
No wonder Bill & Al were hellbent to stick their "v chips" in my boobtube. :)
 
We're waking up to a new document dump that demonstrates just how the NSA is spying on all of us through our phones, computers and televisions (just like that famous dystopian novel) and still Democrats want to hold dear to the idea that there is no way the Administration got their hands on a wire-tapped Trump via the NSA...


😡

1. The CIA can categorically say that the Russian 'finger prints are all over the Hillary/DNC hacks.

2. What they CAN"T say is that the Russians did it. (Umbrage 101)

3. No member of the Obama administration will categorically say, "Trumps phones weren't bugged."

4. The Democrat mouth pieces have been noticeably absent for three days now.

5. Assange's statement that he never received any of the information he made public came from the Russians has a great deal more credibility now.

6. Trump's assertion that he was bugged is no longer in doubt, it never was. What the previous administration and their surrogates are hinging EVERYTHING on is the fine point of Obama "personally" ordering it.

Even the press is beginning to ask embarrassing questions of the democrats.

The democrats have become used to making unbased allegations re. the republicans and having the republicans immediately jump to the defense, bend over, and ask, "Can I have some more sir?" They just weren't prepared for a Trump, who fights back.....publically. They are now reduced to saying, "He's unpresidential." In whose opinion? Theirs? As if they are the final arbiter of what is presidential or not. Obviously they know fuck all of US presidential history.

With one tweet Trump changed the narrative and look who's playing defense now!

Ishmael

I'll lay dollars to donuts that the usual suspects are still going to continue their no-no-no chorus and pretending that they've got Trump nailed to the wall, again, this time, he goes down...,
 
I'll lay dollars to donuts that the usual suspects are still going to continue their no-no-no chorus and pretending that they've got Trump nailed to the wall, again, this time, he goes down...,

Of course, when that's all ya got.

Ishmael
 
Firstly, some pests posted in here need to know their opinion is a mere matter of the scope of their attention span.



What's ironic and will probably take place, is as this plot thickens, and the democrats still calling on investigations and they will begin March 20, the whole thing may just backfire in their face and the cia with them with these wikileaks.
 
Rush might have been right when he suggested that Obama hacked the election and Hillary still lost. Putting that aside a minute. The United States just took a major security hit with the release of these tools that will no doubt wind up in the hands of our enemies to do untold damage today, and in the future. As harmful as these tools can be to ourselves through corruption, in the hands of our enemies the result could be catastrophic. We spent billions acquiring this capability only to see the Obama administration lose it. #WitheredLegacy
 
The alt-lite-rite are the only ones continuing to support this moron while his own people are doing their best to distance themselves from him.

I also learned that the ice-cream truck that rolls by my shop makes real milkshakes.
 
The alt-lite-rite are the only ones continuing to support this moron while his own people are doing their best to distance themselves from him.

I also learned that the ice-cream truck that rolls by my shop makes real milkshakes.

Aside from being a victim, what does Trump have to do with this hugely intrusive, unconstitutional, intelligence net the CIA has thrown over American society?
 
So I see some mistakes on your post. Maybe you did not see some of this ....

on #2: From the report "Background to “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions
in Recent US Elections”: The Analytic Process and Cyber Incident Attribution


Key Judgments: We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.

Moscow’s influence campaign followed a Russian messaging strategy that blends covert intelligence operations—such as cyber activity—with overt efforts by Russian Government agencies, state-funded media, third-party intermediaries, and paid social media users or “trolls.”


To me that says "The Russians did it". Maybe its just me.
 
Aside from being a victim, what does Trump have to do with this hugely intrusive, unconstitutional, intelligence net the CIA has thrown over American society?

What did what you just asked me for no reason have to do with the price of tea in China? Whoops, sorry. GI-NA.
And how did you come up with your definition of "victim"? The only victims are the fucktards who voted for #45.
 
So I see some mistakes on your post. Maybe you did not see some of this ....

on #2: From the report "Background to “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions
in Recent US Elections”: The Analytic Process and Cyber Incident Attribution


Key Judgments: We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.

Moscow’s influence campaign followed a Russian messaging strategy that blends covert intelligence operations—such as cyber activity—with overt efforts by Russian Government agencies, state-funded media, third-party intermediaries, and paid social media users or “trolls.”


To me that says "The Russians did it". Maybe its just me.

So many logical fallacies and leaps to conclusions in Ish's list. The Breakfast Club is really slipping lately.
 
So I see some mistakes on your post. Maybe you did not see some of this ....

on #2: From the report "Background to “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions
in Recent US Elections”: The Analytic Process and Cyber Incident Attribution


Key Judgments: We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.

Moscow’s influence campaign followed a Russian messaging strategy that blends covert intelligence operations—such as cyber activity—with overt efforts by Russian Government agencies, state-funded media, third-party intermediaries, and paid social media users or “trolls.”


To me that says "The Russians did it". Maybe its just me.

In view of this latest dump, how do you know who the "Russians" are?
 
So many logical fallacies and leaps to conclusions in Ish's list. The Breakfast Club is really slipping lately.

The BC hasn't been the same since ISIS had that bastion of vast US tech and war strategery from the late 60's assassinated.
 
Back
Top