The Donald accuses Barry of wiretapping Trump Tower after the election

How soon liberals forget it was the Obama administration who sought to prosecute journalists under the Espionage Act of 1917. Why is it so hard to imagine they would wiretap the Trump campaign. Here is a ten step chronology of known events:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...ma-used-police-state-tactics-undermine-trump/

Which contains the following summary;

"In summary: the Obama administration sought, and eventually obtained, authorization to eavesdrop on the Trump campaign; continued monitoring the Trump team even when no evidence of wrongdoing was found; then relaxed the NSA rules to allow evidence to be shared widely within the government, virtually ensuring that the information, including the conversations of private citizens, would be leaked to the media."

Fakes news, loser. :rolleyes:
 
It remains to be seen. But Obama cant prove it didn't happen.

I suspect Trump has some facts, maybe enough to blackmail Democrats to make nice.

Obama hasn't told Trump to put up or shut up as yet. Obama prolly knows what Trump holds in cards. And Trump may have the cards to fuck Hillary. We rarely know how deals are made. But Trump or someone will do something.

He definitely has the cards to fuck Hillary into a mountain tunnel, all that's needed is a US Attorney with integrity.
 
How is it an illegal wiretap with a FISA warrant?

Legality isn't the issue tho the Obama folks are gone. They cant reveaql the content of the wiretaps. I know all kinds of protected info from my government service I cant reveal after I retired.
 
He definitely has the cards to fuck Hillary into a mountain tunnel, all that's needed is a US Attorney with integrity.

Shes staying outta this dogfight so far. So are some others. NcCain has been quiet.

I expect Trump to throw another card down.
 
How is it an illegal wiretap with a FISA warrant?

The FISA warrant inherently makes it a legal wiretap, one which can only be given if sufficient evidence is presented to a judge.

Therefore, Trump's middle of the night rant just informed people that there was sufficient cause to investigate collusion with a foreign government and virtually ensures that there will be a full blown investigation into "Russiagate."

And these idiots think this is somehow bad for democrats. :D
 
The FISA warrant inherently makes it a legal wiretap, one which can only be given if sufficient evidence is presented to a judge.

Therefore, Trump's middle of the night rant just informed people that there was sufficient cause to investigate collusion with a foreign government and virtually ensures that there will be a full blown investigation into "Russiagate."

And these idiots think this is somehow bad for democrats. :D

The result of the wiretap, according to the FBI, there was nothing there.
 
How soon liberals forget it was the Obama administration who sought to prosecute journalists under the Espionage Act of 1917. Why is it so hard to imagine they would wiretap the Trump campaign. Here is a ten step chronology of known events:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...ma-used-police-state-tactics-undermine-trump/

It's really not difficult to imagine such a thing, as you Trumpkins have demonstrated on numerous occasions (i.e. the birther hoax, Ted Cruz's father's involvement in JFK's assassination, the Bowling Green Massacre, "Pizzagate" etc). Providing independently verifiable evidence, let alone proof, requires actual effort, intellectual rigor, and critical thinking skills. But I do give you credit for having extraordinarily fertile imaginations.
 
It's just as credible as your narrative on the Russians fixing the elections and Trump connections to Putin for which there is no "evidence."
On your side, you've got some blogger with an active imagination and a tenuous grasp of the legal system, and on the other, you've got government officials whose job it is to know the facts. Plus, you've also got several key government officials denying allegations that turn out to be true, and quitting or recusing themselves rather than face further inquiries.
 
A link to the warrant application would be nice to have as well.

Apparently the WH wants that as well:

a senior White House official said that Donald F. McGahn II, the president’s chief counsel, was working on Saturday to secure access to what Mr. McGahn believed was an order issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court authorizing some form of surveillance related to Mr. Trump and his associates.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/04/...ackage-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
 
Trump is punching back. If the Dems continue their "destroy Trump at any cost" scheme they're going to suffer more than a black eye. Right now they're being played like a drum. I think this is going to get a lot nastier and will not end well for them.

But they don't care...their policy of personal destruction is their strategy and they're going to stick with it.

Keep it up!
 
It was early in the morning. Maybe he just woke up mid-dream, thinking the dream was real and just had to tweet.

That's happened to me, when I woke up and thought the dream was real. I don't tweet though because I'm not a 14 year old girl.
 
Or possibly, he's got a touch of the old timer's disease. The man's over 70, after all.
 
Trump is punching back. If the Dems continue their "destroy Trump at any cost" scheme they're going to suffer more than a black eye. Right now they're being played like a drum. I think this is going to get a lot nastier and will not end well for them.

It won't end well for Trump if he can't prove this.
 
Back
Top