The Isolated Blurt Thread XXXIII: N. 12° 38.1' W. 61° 21.4'

Status
Not open for further replies.
"A lonely night, baby girl, I loved you on a lonely night
It was the only time and if I led you on then I apologize."
- The Weeknd, A Lonely Night
 
i'm fairly certain i got less than three hours sleep last night. why? i have no idea. still sucks. also, i want to murder my neighbors. i don't know what the fuck is wrong with their car that makes it sound like loud intermittent beeping when they start it up but they need to fix that shit. it's fucking maddening.

especially when you're already pissed off because you haven't slept for shit.

on the plus side at least i know what the fuck has been waking me up with a start at six in the morning for the last week.
 


http://eoimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/images/imagerecords/89000/89063/thames_oli_2015181.jpg


http://eoimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/images/imagerecords/89000/89063/thanet_oli_2015181.jpg


For at least the past decade, satellites have spotted white dots cropping up in the North Sea. If viewed from Earth’s surface, you would see that these dots are actually wind turbines—huge arrays of towers rising from the sea and topped with electricity-generating rotors. But they’re doing more than harvesting the wind. They appear to also be giving rise to sediment plumes.

Some of the North Sea’s most expansive arrays are visible in these images, acquired on Jun 30, 2015, with the Operational Land Imager (OLI) on the Landsat 8 satellite. When these images were acquired, there were 84 offshore wind farms in Europe (including some under construction). The North Sea accounts for the most offshore wind capacity—69 percent—in European seas, followed by the Irish Sea and Baltic Sea.

The turbines were built to take advantage of high winds blowing over the North Sea’s surface. The London Array, visible in the first detailed image, spans 100 square kilometers (40 square miles). The wind farm, which first became operational in 2013, sits on two natural sandbanks in water as deep as 25 meters (80 feet). The site was chosen because of its proximity to onshore electric power infrastructure and because it is beyond the main shipping lanes through the area.

Other significant wind farms, Thanet and the northern half of Greater Gabbard, are shown in the second and third detailed images. Thanet spans 35 square kilometers (14 square miles) and sits in water measuring 20 to 25 meters deep; the entirety of Greater Gabbard spans 147 square kilometers (57 square miles) and sits in water 24 to 34 meters deep.

But the environment below the water’s surface can also feel the presence of the turbines. The detailed views reveal light-brown plumes of suspended sediments extending from each tower. In a 2014 paper, researchers analyzed satellite imagery and found that the wakes (and plumes) can measure anywhere from 30 to 150 meters wide and up to several kilometers long.

“The fact that the wakes are browner than the surrounding waters shows that they contain more suspended sediments,” said Quinten Vanhellemont, a researcher at the Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences and lead author of the 2014 paper. “This shows that the installation of the wind turbines not only modifies the wind field above the sea surface (which is expected as they are extracting wind energy), but that they also modify the currents and sediment transport in the water.”

Vanhellemont explained that the wakes are generated by the tidal current moving around the foundation of the turbine. The direction and curvature in the wakes are related to the general direction of the current. For example, the image of the London Array was acquired during flood tide, so the wakes follow the northward current. But the tide in this area reverses every six hours, Vanhellemont said, “so the wakes are quite dynamic over the day.”

It’s not yet clear how these changes in sediment transport could affect the relatively shallow underwater environment, which is known to be an important fish nursery.
-NASA

 
I normally eschew food that comes in a cardboard box; but I'm becoming addicted to the fake eggs that come in a little milk carton. Quick, easy and tasty. Just like me.
 
I thought you were going to slam my leftovers for a second there. Can they be that much quicker than cracking eggs?
 
I thought you were going to slam my leftovers for a second there. Can they be that much quicker than cracking eggs?

In my mind they are. Just open and pour in the pan. Eggs you have to crack into a bowl, then wisk, then pour. It's pretty time intensive and makes dirty dishes.
 
My oldest buddy has this awful girlfriend. He's always had poor judgment when it comes to women, but this one is REALLY annoying.

We go out drinking - she's there
We go golfing - she's there.

FFS we could go piss in the woods and she'd be there.

For the past year, I don't think I've ever seen him without her shadowing the poor man.

And she's REALLY annoying. E.g., I tell him what a cocksucker he is and she gets all nasty with me about calling him names.

I don't know what he sees in her, but I'm about to put an ad on Craigslist for a new buddy.
 
In my mind they are. Just open and pour in the pan. Eggs you have to crack into a bowl, then wisk, then pour. It's pretty time intensive and makes dirty dishes.

I'm more of an over easy kinda gal. Even if I wanted scrambled, I still don't think I could do egg substitutes.

Now I have a mashup of the Sex Pistols and The Who in my head.
 
I normally eschew food that comes in a cardboard box; but I'm becoming addicted to the fake eggs that come in a little milk carton. Quick, easy and tasty. Just like me.

Egg Beaters is an acceptable product. Docs only allow me two whole eggs a week. Microwaves up as scrambled in seconds. Got a recipe for mayonnaise somewhere and I use egg replacement stuff. Taste great!
 
Egg scramblers? Microwaves? Jesus Christ, people. Breakfast is supposed to be a pleasant experience.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top