NtlSecAgcy
Loves Spam
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2014
- Posts
- 71
A 41-year-old man supervises and participates in the horrendous rape of a female in Arkansas, the cops bust him and charge him with first degree rape - he's looking at a hard 30 in the state pen.
Hillary Rodham gets the defendant's case and would later laugh about never trusting polygraphs again because the defendant passed concerning this rape. Next, she attacks the rape victim by asking the court to order a psychiatric evaluation be done on the rape victim (by a psychiatrist of the defendant's choosing, of course) because she - Hillary Rodham - swears under oath that she's been told the rape victim is somewhat emotionally and trustworthy handicapped to the point of teasing men and exaggerating about things with men, which experts have told her are common of females from "families" like the rape victim's; Rodham pleads with the court to order her desire of a psychiatric evaluation of the rape victim "in the best interests of justice", even though she admittedly knew her client was guilty.
Before that psychiatric attack could actually happen, though, Clinton manages to get an evidence expert from New York to state that how the police handled one piece of evidence (they cut a section out of the rape victim's underwear for analysis) would certainly render that evidence inadmissible in court - thus, it became a perceived classic case of she said, he said.
So, instead of the hard 30 Clinton's defendant was looking at for first degree rape, he pled down to 5 years in county jail for fondling, with 4 of those years suspended which, having already sat in jail for 2 months awaiting trial, he served 10 months of and then was set free.
For the despicably intolerable act of raping a female.
As our digital records show that both Hillary Clinton and all her fan girls and boys here on the progressive GB habitually maintain that females are raped once by their rapists and then many are raped again by the courts, we are just wondering why when an officer of the court actually participates in such a heinously despicable act, GB progressives reward her by voting for her as President of the United States of America?
Hillary Rodham gets the defendant's case and would later laugh about never trusting polygraphs again because the defendant passed concerning this rape. Next, she attacks the rape victim by asking the court to order a psychiatric evaluation be done on the rape victim (by a psychiatrist of the defendant's choosing, of course) because she - Hillary Rodham - swears under oath that she's been told the rape victim is somewhat emotionally and trustworthy handicapped to the point of teasing men and exaggerating about things with men, which experts have told her are common of females from "families" like the rape victim's; Rodham pleads with the court to order her desire of a psychiatric evaluation of the rape victim "in the best interests of justice", even though she admittedly knew her client was guilty.
Before that psychiatric attack could actually happen, though, Clinton manages to get an evidence expert from New York to state that how the police handled one piece of evidence (they cut a section out of the rape victim's underwear for analysis) would certainly render that evidence inadmissible in court - thus, it became a perceived classic case of she said, he said.
So, instead of the hard 30 Clinton's defendant was looking at for first degree rape, he pled down to 5 years in county jail for fondling, with 4 of those years suspended which, having already sat in jail for 2 months awaiting trial, he served 10 months of and then was set free.
For the despicably intolerable act of raping a female.
As our digital records show that both Hillary Clinton and all her fan girls and boys here on the progressive GB habitually maintain that females are raped once by their rapists and then many are raped again by the courts, we are just wondering why when an officer of the court actually participates in such a heinously despicable act, GB progressives reward her by voting for her as President of the United States of America?
