The Trump Campaign #2: The Best Thread On The GB, Believe Me

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=80878056&postcount=4993

Let's see... BotanyBoy argues that only the government can use force against its citizens, and businesses cannot use force against the government.

SgtSpiderMan brings up Donald Trump's effort to get President Obama to produce his birth certificate.

BotanyBoy repeatedly claims that Trump didn't use force, and we go through definitions until he seems to have lost track of the topic.

One question: If members of government know how to use force and businesses do not, why should a business person be given a government position? Is a person like Donald Trump going to know what to do with the H-bombs in the B-52's?

And they say that there are no dumb questions.. .

It is called "police power" in legal terms and it has nothing to do with the necessity (usually) of using actual policemen to enforce these powers. Although the name of law enforcement -police- comes from the same semantics tree.

It isn't a question of knowledge or skill, as you suggest, but one of authority. You either have the authority to wield police power or you don't. Power such as the power of eminent domain. Trump would love to have the power of eminent domain as it happens he now has to either Persuade or bribe various officials to use their powers of eminent domain if he for example needs a city block to build something.

I used to get rather annoyed the way you use your little one-liner snarks instead of actually debating but I think you should probably stick to that, because whenever you try to flesh out an idea it reveals the depth of your reasoning capacity.
 
And they say that there are no dumb questions.. .

It is called "police power" in legal terms and it has nothing to do with the necessity (usually) of using actual policemen to enforce these powers. Although the name of law enforcement -police- comes from the same semantics tree.

It isn't a question of knowledge or skill, as you suggest, but one of authority. You either have the authority to wield police power or you don't. Power such as the power of eminent domain. Trump would love to have the power of eminent domain as it happens he now has to either Persuade or bribe various officials to use their powers of eminent domain if he for example needs a city block to build something.

I used to get rather annoyed the way you use your little one-liner snarks instead of actually debating but I think you should probably stick to that, because whenever you try to flesh out an idea it reveals the depth of your reasoning capacity.
Ooh, so sorry if my question made you think too hard.
 
Apparently, Bill Clinton has a black love child.....Hillary's health is front and center, I mean, this isnt a rock slide, its a down right avalanche of media frenzy...
 
Ooh, so sorry if my question made you think too hard.

See, there is your problem. Just like your previous post, everything after if was inaccurate. That's the problem with conditional if-then statements or questions if the "if" is wrong the "then" is also.

Don't you have some random, anecdotal weather reports to post?
 
Congress pays no attention to what Obama says, so why should we?

Sounding Republican all of a sudden. :rolleyes:

QUICK PHO!! DEFEND THE QUEEN OF WALL ST. AT ANY COST!!! HER HIGHNESS'S HONOR MUST BE PROTECTED!!!

LOL what a fuckin' tool.
 
I would be very interested in seeing the evidence that people who self-reference more than average make less effective leaders than those who don't. (Which isthe point of your post.) I have no evidence, but based upon my life experience what you are trying to claim here is simply wrong.
"It's all about her," you posted. I assume you wrote those words. There must be evidence for that, and self-reference is a good indicator. There's nothing unusual about her self-reference ratio, and Donald Trump's is substantially larger.
 
See, there is your problem. Just like your previous post, everything after if was inaccurate. That's the problem with conditional if-then statements or questions if the "if" is wrong the "then" is also.

Don't you have some random, anecdotal weather reports to post?
You can make claims that things are inaccurate all night long, but until you provide accurate facts, I don't give a shit.
 
"It's all about her," you posted. I assume you wrote those words. There must be evidence for that, and self-reference is a good indicator. There's nothing unusual about her self-reference ratio, and Donald Trump's is substantially larger.

Huh?

Is there evidence about people who frequently self reference or not? It's an interesting topic, very worthy of discussion. Stop being a defensive bitch and pull out some info.
 
And probably most of the undecideds. You left out the important part in your effort to be a dupe for a shyster.

Huh? I don't understand this one bit. What the hell is a "dupe for a shyster"? You accusing me of copying a shifty Jew or some other weird shit?
 
In the brief period after the election but before the civil war.

Sorry, I'm not a Chicken Little. I think the United States will manage no matter who wins. But then I'm not young and wet behind the ears.
 
Huh? I don't understand this one bit. What the hell is a "dupe for a shyster"? You accusing me of copying a shifty Jew or some other weird shit?

How precious that you don't know what the reference to "dupe for a shyster" is. Are you sure you're not a natural blonde? :D
 
Sorry, I'm not a Chicken Little. I think the United States will manage no matter who wins. But then I'm not young and wet behind the ears.

It'll suck no matter who wins. The corner has already been backed into.
 
To be fair, "shyster" is a term for an unscrupulous lawyer, and Donald Trump is no such thing.
 
Back
Top