Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump has been using the US government and his post as the most powerful officer in it to enrich himself and his billionaire buddies?
If you're talking about privately then sure, that's what you're SUPPOSED TO DO in the private sector.
Not in the oval office.
Beyond genetics there is very little difference between the two if any.
Why would I be surprised? Either way the 1% are going to rat fuck the citizenry, completely enabled and protected by whoever wins.
1] There is no such thing as what you're supposed to do in the private sector. That's why it's private: So people can do what they want, legal or not, & others don't necessarily know.
I was referring to what Trump has done for years... It's similar to people posting pics of themselves drunk on Instagram, etc... Don't plan on running for (& certainly not winning) public office after that.
are more differences than you seem to think.
However, President Trump would enable he 1% he's been a part of to do what they have for years & then some,
Hillary would protect the not-quite-as-rich folk & still let the mid-&-lower groups pray & fend for themselves.
Put Trump in office, and there will be riots in the Rotunda.
That's a very good point. Obama has not been giving radical Islamic terrorists hope for a better future, damn him.In 2009 President Barack Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize. Announcing the prize, the Norwegian Nobel Committee declared: “Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world’s attention and given its people hope for a better future.” However, ironically, it turned out that during the Obama Administration more people have been killed in the Middle East and around the world than during the administrations of his predecessor, George W. Bush, who became the object of international obloquy for the wars he conducted in Afghanistan and Iraq.
That's a very good point. Obama has not been giving radical Islamic terrorists hope for a better future, damn him.
P. S. Still no one has given any reason why Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize.
I'll give two:
1] The award name is self-explanatory.
2] Outside of the first paragraph of your prior post [asking for (among other things) natural disasters other than yourself & a few other posters), it is filled with BS, so we reasonably expect you will respond to factual statements we make by likewise claiming they are.
Neither of those are reasons Obama, President DroneStrike should have a peace prize.
Don't know which world you're in, but I can't find a grain of truth in any of this. Maybe you can provide some references.Name a dictator who Obama has pandered to. Name an ally he has sold out. Name a natural disaster on US soil that he failed to respond appropriately to. Cite an instance of the economy being destroyed by any federal policy during his administration.
First let's list all the worlds leaders who have showed respect to our President:oh my, not a one. When he was first elected he went on a "kiss the dictator ass" tour, told the world what terrible people we Americans are, lied to the U.N. Since then every country he has gone to he has insulted and run down his own country. What a President.
OK.Countries he has kissed up to or helped with his terrible foreign policies: Cuba, the leader of Russia (just before the last election he told the Russians they could have Europe once he was elected.) The dictator of Venezuela, Iran, China, North Korea, Laos, Vietnam (do you want me to go from A-Z or just name a few of the major ones?) Let us not forget his protection of terrorist both outside and inside our country.
Countries he has sold out: U.S., P.I., Iraq, Israel, England, Canada, France, Mexico, Germany, Poland, Turkey, Jordan, South Korea, Afghanistan, the entire Pacific region,Japan and I could go on if you like.
Countries neutral or friendly that he has insulted or sold out: Singapore, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Italy, Kenya, Haiti, Libya, Tibet, Malaysia, Pakistan, Ukrainian to name a few.
States he showed little or no care of: LA, FA, CA, Mich, the Midwest, (oh in CA add the Porter Ranch Disaster - man made poison to the fires) TX, HA, well if you add the riots he caused in MD, MO, etc. and his lack of feelings for women and young girls throughout the U.S., in the end just about every state has shown his lack of care and his poor economic policies that have lost jobs and made his and Hillary's 1% buddies rich while the country lies stale.
Policies: Destruction of freedom of the press, freedom of speech, lack of security at our borders, his release of hundreds of criminals - drug gangs and gang bangers - his giving citizenship to hundreds of people who have been ordered out of the country instead of helping those who wish to become citizens by law, his sexual perverted love for people who would have freedom to go into the women's restrooms and showers by just saying I'm a drag queen. Every member of his administration has been accused of criminal behavior, incompetence or even treason. He and his wife are racists (followers of their beloved Rev. Wright, Jackson, and Sharpton).
Number One is a reason nobody should have to give a reason, especially when you're obviously online & can look such things up.
Then again, you obviously need things explained to you when you name the President & an unrelated nickname after it.
Number One is a reason nobody should have to give a reason, especially when you're obviously online & can look such things up.
Then again, you obviously need things explained to you when you name the President & an unrelated nickname after it.
No, it really isn't and I notice you still can't name a single reason why he should get one.
Neither can anyone else it's ok.
Obama is not a horrible POTUS, but he's not exactly peace prize material.
Reality is he got if for being first black POTUS, because racist regressive SJW's decided his skin color made him the greatest POTUS of all time before finding out that's simply not the case.
Are you actually claiming Obama, the first POTUS to use the PATRIOT act to bomb a US citizen, hasn't ever used drone strikes?
Seriously?
You know you're supposed to mix the Kool Aid with water right?
Don't eat the dry powder directly.
No, I didn't, nor did anyone else. However, I did quite plainly explain why none of us should have to,
I don't know what the criteria is, & those whose job it is to know the criteria felt he was, so it is not for any of us to disagree.
Reality is that entire piece is BS. His skin color has an effect on his election in history, but not how good of a President he is/was, nor whether or not he deserved a Peace Prize now or ever.
Another reality is while you claim to not know why he deserved a Peace Prize, you similarly cannot explain to many of us why he doesn't/didn't deserve one.
You should have to because you think he deserved one.
It is absolutely up to us to disagree, we have freedom of speech where I'm from and if I think his Peace Prize is bullshit and explain why then question those who disagree it's my right to do so.
didn't say it had anything to do with how good of a POTUS he is/was or whether or not he he deserved a peace prize.
Reality is he got if for being first black POTUS, because racist regressive SJW's decided his skin color made him the greatest POTUS of all time before finding out that's simply not the case.
Yes I can. Because there was no reason we he should have gotten one.
He hasn't don much if anything to advance peace on Earth, in fact he's done quite the opposite making his getting the prize all the more laughable.
I never said I think he deserved one.
You certainly did.
Please stop replying to anyone when you can't even recall what you yourself wrote within a day in the same thread.
so I am turning it on you & asking for a reason he shouldn't, which you can't give me.
He's done more than you.
You probably are not a political figure at all, but you are also not one of the people who decides who deserves or gets a Peace Prize, & since the people who do make that decision decided he deserved & received one, & you're the one saying he didn't, being a more-deserving candidate than you is all that matters after the fact.
You certainly are defensive of those who might challenge his highness's NPP.![]()
No I accused SJW racists of that. Learn to read.
LMFAO!!!
Because he's overseen numerous pointless and violent regime changes,
destabilized more than one region of the planet plunging them into religious, sectarian and civil wars resulting in the brutal torture and death of hundreds of thousands of people.
He's also turned weapons of war onto his own people.
I can't possibly imagine better, more valid reasons than warmongering and murder to NOT give someone a Nobel Peace Prize.
LOL really?
Just what has he done to promote world peace in between drone striking his own people and setting off wars?![]()
No, it's not. You're just pissed because precious Obama, his highness, turned out to be a warmonger after everyone rushed to shower him with awards he hadn't yet earned.
I'll give two:
1] The award name is self-explanatory.
2] Outside of the first paragraph of your prior post [asking for (among other things) natural disasters other than yourself & a few other posters), it is filled with BS, so we reasonably expect you will respond to factual statements we make by likewise claiming they are.