The Obamagood Thread

[Beco]

Wow, can't take much more of Obama.....how many riots on his watch?

 

[phrodeau]

Put Trump in office, and there will be riots in the Rotunda.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

Trump has been using the US government and his post as the most powerful officer in it to enrich himself and his billionaire buddies?

If you're talking about privately then sure, that's what you're SUPPOSED TO DO in the private sector.

Not in the oval office.

1] There is no such thing as what you're supposed to do in the private sector. That's why it's private: So people can do what they want, legal or not, & others don't necessarily know.

But I was referring to what Trump has done for years... It's similar to people posting pics of themselves drunk on Instagram, etc... Don't plan on running for (& certainly not winning) public office after that.

Beyond genetics there is very little difference between the two if any.

Why would I be surprised? Either way the 1% are going to rat fuck the citizenry, completely enabled and protected by whoever wins.

There are more differences than you seem to think. However, President Trump would enable he 1% he's been a part of to do what they have for years & then some, whereas Hillary would protect the not-quite-as-rich folk & still let the mid-&-lower groups pray & fend for themselves.

 

[BotanyBoy]

1] There is no such thing as what you're supposed to do in the private sector. That's why it's private: So people can do what they want, legal or not, & others don't necessarily know.

It's not mandated but this is the USA.

And in the USA getting paid is the thing you're supposed to be doing for the vast VAST majority of people.

If improving your economic standing and thus quality of life along with ones physical, mental and spiritual self then you're almost certainly considered a worthless piece of shit by pretty much everyone.

I was referring to what Trump has done for years... It's similar to people posting pics of themselves drunk on Instagram, etc... Don't plan on running for (& certainly not winning) public office after that.

Yes I know, and I disagree....because Trump hasn't been abusing his power as a top federal official, backing policy that has resulted in the gutting of the working class for the benefits of the rich. Taking hundreds of millions of dollars from big corporate and international special interest to back policies both here at home and abroad internationally that have ended tragically etc. etc.

Unlike HRC, who has.

are more differences than you seem to think.

Such as?

However, President Trump would enable he 1% he's been a part of to do what they have for years & then some,

Uh hua....

Hillary would protect the not-quite-as-rich folk & still let the mid-&-lower groups pray & fend for themselves.

BAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Based upon what? Her rhetoric? It would have to be....her record speaks EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE.

She makes Romney look fuckin' progressive.....

 

[Beco]

Put Trump in office, and there will be riots in the Rotunda.

Either way, it gets worse. Nobody is addressing the issue.

 

[NeverEndingMe]

obama, the man is making meth users look sexy

 

[IrezumiKiss]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CtEEuMxUMAAGcP7.jpg

 

[IrezumiKiss]

http://media.vanityfair.com/photos/57db0ce51e9e7cc118c45846/master/w_960,c_limit/barack-obama-doris-kearns-goodwin-annie-leibovitz.jpg

BARACK OBAMA AND DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN: THE ULTIMATE EXIT INTERVIEW

As his two-term presidency draws to a close, Barack Obama is looking back—at the legacies of his predecessors, as well as his own—and forward, to the freedom of life after the White House. In a wide-ranging conversation with one of the nation’s foremost presidential historians, he talks about his ambitions, frustrations, and the decisions that still haunt him.

http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/09/barack-obama-doris-kearns-goodwin-interview

 

[Beco]

In 2009 President Barack Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize. Announcing the prize, the Norwegian Nobel Committee declared: “Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world’s attention and given its people hope for a better future.” However, ironically, it turned out that during the Obama Administration more people have been killed in the Middle East and around the world than during the administrations of his predecessor, George W. Bush, who became the object of international obloquy for the wars he conducted in Afghanistan and Iraq.

 

[phrodeau]

In 2009 President Barack Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize. Announcing the prize, the Norwegian Nobel Committee declared: “Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world’s attention and given its people hope for a better future.” However, ironically, it turned out that during the Obama Administration more people have been killed in the Middle East and around the world than during the administrations of his predecessor, George W. Bush, who became the object of international obloquy for the wars he conducted in Afghanistan and Iraq.

That's a very good point. Obama has not been giving radical Islamic terrorists hope for a better future, damn him.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

That's a very good point. Obama has not been giving radical Islamic terrorists hope for a better future, damn him.

Am I the only one having a problem with a Peace-Prize-winner being followed by likely 1 of 2 major-party candidates who neither seem to be as well-aware of how to act & against who in other countries as he is/was?!

Also, never mind the fact every day of past few months I click my Windows "Start" icon, I get news of another shooting often started by cops & killing innocents, in the country led by this same winner (who will, again, be followed by a moron)!

 

[urguyscott]

Name a dictator who Obama has pandered to. Name an ally he has sold out. Name a natural disaster on US soil that he failed to respond appropriately to. Cite an instance of the economy being destroyed by any federal policy during his administration.

First let's list all the worlds leaders who have showed respect to our President: oh my, not a one. When he was first elected he went on a "kiss the dictator ass" tour, told the world what terrible people we Americans are, lied to the U.N. Since then every country he has gone to he has insulted and run down his own country. What a President.

OK.Countries he has kissed up to or helped with his terrible foreign policies: Cuba, the leader of Russia (just before the last election he told the Russians they could have Europe once he was elected.) The dictator of Venezuela, Iran, China, North Korea, Laos, Vietnam (do you want me to go from A-Z or just name a few of the major ones?) Let us not forget his protection of terrorist both outside and inside our country.

Countries he has sold out: U.S., P.I., Iraq, Israel, England, Canada, France, Mexico, Germany, Poland, Turkey, Jordan, South Korea, Afghanistan, the entire Pacific region,Japan and I could go on if you like.

Countries neutral or friendly that he has insulted or sold out: Singapore, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Italy, Kenya, Haiti, Libya, Tibet, Malaysia, Pakistan, Ukrainian to name a few.

States he showed little or no care of: LA, FA, CA, Mich, the Midwest, (oh in CA add the Porter Ranch Disaster - man made poison to the fires) TX, HA, well if you add the riots he caused in MD, MO, etc. and his lack of feelings for women and young girls throughout the U.S., in the end just about every state has shown his lack of care and his poor economic policies that have lost jobs and made his and Hillary's 1% buddies rich while the country lies stale.

Policies: Destruction of freedom of the press, freedom of speech, lack of security at our borders, his release of hundreds of criminals - drug gangs and gang bangers - his giving citizenship to hundreds of people who have been ordered out of the country instead of helping those who wish to become citizens by law, his sexual perverted love for people who would have freedom to go into the women's restrooms and showers by just saying I'm a drag queen. Every member of his administration has been accused of criminal behavior, incompetence or even treason. He and his wife are racists (followers of their beloved Rev. Wright, Jackson, and Sharpton).

 

[urguyscott]

P. S. Still no one has given any reason why Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize. Really, serious, what did the fool do to earn it. And don't give that B. S well it is for something he will do in the future. I don't believe in Time Machines and neither does anyone else. When he was given it, there was nothing he had done to earn it. There were many more - well every one in the world was just as worthy as he was- to be given the award. It is political and not for as Mr. Nobel desired. They thought he would be a great Socialist Puppet Leader of the Communists and bring the world back to the middle ages or the stone age. For that he has tried very hard, but that is not a reason to give him what at one time was the highest award in the world. They made a laughing stock out of our President and their country.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

P. S. Still no one has given any reason why Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize.

I'll give two:

1] The award name is self-explanatory.

2] Outside of the first paragraph of your prior post [asking for (among other things) natural disasters other than yourself & a few other posters), it is filled with BS, so we reasonably expect you will respond to factual statements we make by likewise claiming they are.

 

[BotanyBoy]

I'll give two:

1] The award name is self-explanatory.

2] Outside of the first paragraph of your prior post [asking for (among other things) natural disasters other than yourself & a few other posters), it is filled with BS, so we reasonably expect you will respond to factual statements we make by likewise claiming they are.

Neither of those are reasons Obama, President DroneStrike should have a peace prize.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

Neither of those are reasons Obama, President DroneStrike should have a peace prize.

Number One is a reason nobody should have to give a reason, especially when you're obviously online & can look such things up.

Then again, you obviously need things explained to you when you name the President & an unrelated nickname after it.

 

[phrodeau]

Name a dictator who Obama has pandered to. Name an ally he has sold out. Name a natural disaster on US soil that he failed to respond appropriately to. Cite an instance of the economy being destroyed by any federal policy during his administration.

First let's list all the worlds leaders who have showed respect to our President: oh my, not a one. When he was first elected he went on a "kiss the dictator ass" tour, told the world what terrible people we Americans are, lied to the U.N. Since then every country he has gone to he has insulted and run down his own country. What a President.

OK.Countries he has kissed up to or helped with his terrible foreign policies: Cuba, the leader of Russia (just before the last election he told the Russians they could have Europe once he was elected.) The dictator of Venezuela, Iran, China, North Korea, Laos, Vietnam (do you want me to go from A-Z or just name a few of the major ones?) Let us not forget his protection of terrorist both outside and inside our country.

Countries he has sold out: U.S., P.I., Iraq, Israel, England, Canada, France, Mexico, Germany, Poland, Turkey, Jordan, South Korea, Afghanistan, the entire Pacific region,Japan and I could go on if you like.

Countries neutral or friendly that he has insulted or sold out: Singapore, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Italy, Kenya, Haiti, Libya, Tibet, Malaysia, Pakistan, Ukrainian to name a few.

States he showed little or no care of: LA, FA, CA, Mich, the Midwest, (oh in CA add the Porter Ranch Disaster - man made poison to the fires) TX, HA, well if you add the riots he caused in MD, MO, etc. and his lack of feelings for women and young girls throughout the U.S., in the end just about every state has shown his lack of care and his poor economic policies that have lost jobs and made his and Hillary's 1% buddies rich while the country lies stale.

Policies: Destruction of freedom of the press, freedom of speech, lack of security at our borders, his release of hundreds of criminals - drug gangs and gang bangers - his giving citizenship to hundreds of people who have been ordered out of the country instead of helping those who wish to become citizens by law, his sexual perverted love for people who would have freedom to go into the women's restrooms and showers by just saying I'm a drag queen. Every member of his administration has been accused of criminal behavior, incompetence or even treason. He and his wife are racists (followers of their beloved Rev. Wright, Jackson, and Sharpton).

Don't know which world you're in, but I can't find a grain of truth in any of this. Maybe you can provide some references.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Number One is a reason nobody should have to give a reason, especially when you're obviously online & can look such things up.

Then again, you obviously need things explained to you when you name the President & an unrelated nickname after it.

Not at all and if you defend him getting the Nobel Peace Prize you should be able to explain why they chose to give it to him.

And yeah Obama's a war criminal, that's not even up for debate. We just aren't going to do anything about it.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Number One is a reason nobody should have to give a reason, especially when you're obviously online & can look such things up.

No, it really isn't and I notice you still can't name a single reason why he should get one.

Neither can anyone else it's ok.

Obama is not a horrible POTUS, but he's not exactly peace prize material.

Reality is he got if for being first black POTUS, because racist regressive SJW's decided his skin color made him the greatest POTUS of all time before finding out that's simply not the case.

Then again, you obviously need things explained to you when you name the President & an unrelated nickname after it.

Are you actually claiming Obama, the first POTUS to use the PATRIOT act to bomb a US citizen, hasn't ever used drone strikes?

Seriously?

You know you're supposed to mix the Kool Aid with water right?

Don't eat the dry powder directly.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

No, it really isn't and I notice you still can't name a single reason why he should get one.

Neither can anyone else it's ok.

No, I didn't, nor did anyone else. However, I did quite plainly explain why none of us should have to, & why many of us are not among the few asking others to. However, since you're among those few, it says things about your intelligence that make it rather obvious why you failed to comprehend what I wrote.

Obama is not a horrible POTUS, but he's not exactly peace prize material.

He is certainly not a horrible President (wait until his successor's first term is over). He may or may not be the latter; I don't know what the criteria is, & those whose job it is to know the criteria felt he was, so it is not for any of us to disagree.

Reality is he got if for being first black POTUS, because racist regressive SJW's decided his skin color made him the greatest POTUS of all time before finding out that's simply not the case.

Reality is that entire piece is BS. His skin color has an effect on his election in history, but not how good of a President he is/was, nor whether or not he deserved a Peace Prize now or ever.

Another reality is while you claim to not know why he deserved a Peace Prize, you similarly cannot explain to many of us why he doesn't/didn't deserve one.

Are you actually claiming Obama, the first POTUS to use the PATRIOT act to bomb a US citizen, hasn't ever used drone strikes?

Seriously?

You know you're supposed to mix the Kool Aid with water right?

Don't eat the dry powder directly.

I am not claiming that, nor am I claiming to know what Kool-Aid or its powder has to do with him, the Act, or this topic at all.

Oh, but I do... Nothing. The same as what you truly know about why he deserved one or not.

 

[BotanyBoy]

No, I didn't, nor did anyone else. However, I did quite plainly explain why none of us should have to,

I don't know what the criteria is, & those whose job it is to know the criteria felt he was, so it is not for any of us to disagree.

You should have to because you think he deserved one.

It is absolutely up to us to disagree, we have freedom of speech where I'm from and if I think his Peace Prize is bullshit and explain why then question those who disagree it's my right to do so.

Reality is that entire piece is BS. His skin color has an effect on his election in history, but not how good of a President he is/was, nor whether or not he deserved a Peace Prize now or ever.

I didn't say it had anything to do with how good of a POTUS he is/was or whether or not he he deserved a peace prize.

I said that's why he got one.

Another reality is while you claim to not know why he deserved a Peace Prize, you similarly cannot explain to many of us why he doesn't/didn't deserve one.

Yes I can. Because there was no reason we he should have gotten one.

He hasn't don much if anything to advance peace on Earth, in fact he's done quite the opposite making his getting the prize all the more laughable.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

You should have to because you think he deserved one.

It is absolutely up to us to disagree, we have freedom of speech where I'm from and if I think his Peace Prize is bullshit and explain why then question those who disagree it's my right to do so.

I never said I think he deserved one. Maybe you care if I think so & maybe you don't. But it is far more than a maybe to say it doesn't matter if I think he deserved one or not, I have yet to post in this thread if I think so or not (that I recall), & regardless we have freedom of speech & opinions here, so there is no reason I have to explain any opinion I may not even have to anyone.

didn't say it had anything to do with how good of a POTUS he is/was or whether or not he he deserved a peace prize.

You certainly did.

Reality is he got if for being first black POTUS, because racist regressive SJW's decided his skin color made him the greatest POTUS of all time before finding out that's simply not the case.

Please stop replying to anyone when you can't even recall what you yourself wrote within a day in the same thread.

Yes I can. Because there was no reason we he should have gotten one.

You say that, & facts say otherwise. Besides, I am not the one saying he deserved it or asking for reasons why he got it. You are the one making that request, while simultaneously claiming he shouldn't have gotten one, so I am turning it on you & asking for a reason he shouldn't, which you can't give me.

He hasn't don much if anything to advance peace on Earth, in fact he's done quite the opposite making his getting the prize all the more laughable.

He's done more than you. You probably are not a political figure at all, but you are also not one of the people who decides who deserves or gets a Peace Prize, & since the people who do make that decision decided he deserved & received one, & you're the one saying he didn't, being a more-deserving candidate than you is all that matters after the fact.

 

[BotanyBoy]

I never said I think he deserved one.

You certainly are defensive of those who might challenge his highness's NPP.

You certainly did.

Please stop replying to anyone when you can't even recall what you yourself wrote within a day in the same thread.

No I accused SJW racists of that. Learn to read.

so I am turning it on you & asking for a reason he shouldn't, which you can't give me.

LMFAO!!!

Because he's overseen numerous pointless and violent regime changes, destabilized more than one region of the planet plunging them into religious, sectarian and civil wars resulting in the brutal torture and death of hundreds of thousands of people.

He's also turned weapons of war onto his own people.

I can't possibly imagine better, more valid reasons than warmongering and murder to NOT give someone a Nobel Peace Prize.

He's done more than you.

LOL really?

Just what has he done to promote world peace in between drone striking his own people and setting off wars?

You probably are not a political figure at all, but you are also not one of the people who decides who deserves or gets a Peace Prize, & since the people who do make that decision decided he deserved & received one, & you're the one saying he didn't, being a more-deserving candidate than you is all that matters after the fact.

No, it's not. You're just pissed because precious Obama, his highness, turned out to be a warmonger after everyone rushed to shower him with awards he hadn't yet earned.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

You certainly are defensive of those who might challenge his highness's NPP.

I wasn't discussing a highness. Perhaps discussing things with people who were high, but...

No I accused SJW racists of that. Learn to read.

I learned to read long ago. Learn to write comprehensibly & comprehend others' writings (among other things).

LMFAO!!!

Those who can do.

Because he's overseen numerous pointless and violent regime changes,

From one to another... Which includes the removal of Hussein & Bin Laden, which he should get credit for, regardless of what happens due to their replacements.

destabilized more than one region of the planet plunging them into religious, sectarian and civil wars resulting in the brutal torture and death of hundreds of thousands of people.

I agree with all but the first word; Much like this country (& "Brexit"), those areas were not stable when his first administration began.

He's also turned weapons of war onto his own people.

He's done no such thing.

I can't possibly imagine better, more valid reasons than warmongering and murder to NOT give someone a Nobel Peace Prize.

Which would matter if he had done them, or not improved places (with acts like the aforementioned violent people dying), which are great reasons to award someone an "NPP".

LOL really?

Just what has he done to promote world peace in between drone striking his own people and setting off wars?

Admittedly, nothing, as he hasn't done those things.

No, it's not. You're just pissed because precious Obama, his highness, turned out to be a warmonger after everyone rushed to shower him with awards he hadn't yet earned.

No. You're pissed due to him getting awards we both know his predecessor nor successor will likely earn nor even come as close as he did to potentially/perhaps earning them.

 

[urguyscott]

I'll give two:

1] The award name is self-explanatory.

2] Outside of the first paragraph of your prior post [asking for (among other things) natural disasters other than yourself & a few other posters), it is filled with BS, so we reasonably expect you will respond to factual statements we make by likewise claiming they are.

Still no answer on why he was given the Nobel prize. Come on mate, at least come up with a good lie.

By the way did everyone see how Bill Clinton kicked Obama in the rear at the air port? Man not even Obama's boss has any respect for him. Poor Obama had to come out of the plane and beg Clinton to let him take off. It's bad when no world leader respects him, but when his own boss the Clinton's show him he is nothing but a puppet it really is a shame and an embarrassment to our country.

Ask the people of LA about Obama. And I didn't put anything in my post that wasn't true, but then the truth hurts. Castro, the dictators or China, Russia, Iran, Venezuela, etc. etc. he has kissed up to and in return they treated him like trash. I named just a few in my post, but you can just go back and look at his eight years in office and see how he has kissed ass to the worlds worst leaders and insulted our allies. The leader of Singapore and of the P. I. both told him to shut up. He has lied to the U.N. every time he goes there. His record is his record. He sold out to Russia just before the last election while he was in South Korea. Even the little Joseph Gobbles of the media showed it when his mike was left open. The deal he made with Iran, his failure with the terrorist who have gained power since he came to office and the fact that every member of his administration has been in trouble over lies, corruption, criminal behavior or treason. And Clinton tops the list. Leaders don't meet him at the airports, don't even give him ladders so he can leave his plane and insult him when they do meet.

Look all you have to do is explain what he did to win the Nobel prize and what leaders in the world have treated him with respect. Easy.