The Positive Presidental Election Thread

Liar

now with 17% more class
Joined
Dec 4, 2003
Posts
43,715
We have endless threads bickering about who is more corrupt, in worse health, the biggest racist, the least tempramentally suited or just the most evil.

Here's one for the other side.

Are you a supporter of Mrs Clinton or Mr Trump? (I don't care about Johnson, or Stein, or whatever a McMullen is, they have no shot at becoming POTUS.) Are you going to vote for one, not as a means to deny the other the Oval Office, but because you want your canidiate there? Or at lest think they're good enough, if not your first choice.

If so, why? What do you like about them? What are their positive attributes that makes you think they'll do a good job running the country? What policies of theirs is it that you agree with?

Difficulty: NOT compared to the other one. If you mention the opponent, you land on my list of people eligble for random dick pic PMs when they least expect it. And not my dick, which of course is magnificent. Ugly, hairy old guy dick. With warts.
 
They're both good looking and have enormous sex-appeal.
What else……
Nothing.
;)

EDIT
lol eyer's post
 

What makes you think I'm playing American? I have bizniz and family in your crazy-ass country, so it affects me. Since I can't vote there, all I can do is bitch about it on the Internet. Which I will, and you can't stop. So suck it.
 
What makes you think I'm playing American? I have bizniz and family in your crazy-ass country, so it affects me. Since I can't vote there, all I can do is bitch about it on the Internet. Which I will, and you can't stop. So suck it.
Me too. Close family and good friends with whom I speak quite often over the phone. So I'm more attuned to what's going on over there, than anywhere else.
Plus pretty much everyone else is interested in US politics, since they still tend to set the agenda for the rest of the world.
 
Last edited:
Hillary has 30 years experience in Washington politics.
Trump is willing to shake up the status quo.

That's about it.
 
Hillary has 30 years experience in Washington politics.
Trump is willing to shake up the status quo.

That's about it.

Shaking up the status quo is actually a good thing, I think. The status quo (primarily the Republican-controlled Congress) needs a good shake. If Trump had given a half-believable means by which he would/could/really wanted to do it, there'd be a reason to consider him as a candidate. He hasn't; he's just a big ball of noxious gas.
 
Hillary has 30 years experience in Washington politics.
Trump is willing to shake up the status quo.

That's about it.

You didn't mention which one you support and from your post I can't figure it out.
 
Shaking up the status quo is actually a good thing, I think. The status quo (primarily the Republican-controlled Congress) needs a good shake. If Trump had given a half-believable means by which he would/could/really wanted to do it, there'd be a reason to consider him as a candidate. He hasn't; he's just a big ball of noxious gas.

Dick pics for you.

Can't anyone read the fucking rules?
 
What makes you think I'm playing American? I have bizniz and family in your crazy-ass country, so it affects me.

Really, wannabe?

Where exactly is your "bizniz and family" located in these "crazy-ass" desert badlands of The Republic of Texas?

'Cause, you know, your piece of socialist shit ass doesn't have to wannabe a USSAer at all...

...since you were born a natural.
 
Really, wannabe?

Where exactly is your "bizniz and family" located in these "crazy-ass" desert badlands of The Republic of Texas?
If it absolutely has to be Texas, I have a cousin in Longview. Why?

The rest of the bizniz and stateside family resides in other parts on the union.

'Cause, you know, your piece of socialist shit ass doesn't have to wannabe a USSAer at all...

...since you were born a natural.
This probably sounded witty in your head.
 
Dick pics for you.

Can't anyone read the fucking rules?

Is there an English translation for this? I can't figure out what you are either objecting to or espousing. (Supporting shaking up the status quo--which I actually think Hillary Clinton would do, considering that the status quo is a do nothing, Republican-controlled Congress--is a positive aspect of the presidential election, I think.)
 
Is there an English translation for this? I can't figure out what you are either objecting to or espousing. (Supporting shaking up the status quo--which I actually think Hillary Clinton would do, considering that the status quo is a do nothing, Republican-controlled Congress--is a positive aspect of the presidential election, I think.)

I asked: Those who support and plan to vote for either Hillary or Trump, can you post here and state why you do so?

Without mentioning the candidate you don't support. Or I will punish you with dick pics. Or at least a scowl. This was about the postiive traits you see in the candidate of your choice. "He/she not being the other one" is not it.
 
I'm a socialist foreigner, I have no practical say in the matter since I can't vote but, as a fellow wannabe, I admire Vladimir Putin's method(s) of adding my two socialist cents, anyway.

Understood, squirrel.
 
I asked: Those who support and plan to vote for either Hillary or Trump, can you post here and state why you do so?

Without mentioning the candidate you don't support. Or I will punish you with dick pics. Or at least a scowl. This was about the postiive traits you see in the candidate of your choice. "He/she not being the other one" is not it.

You'd have to be intellectually challenged not to know who I was voting for--and at least one reason why--from what I posted. But I guess you just want to fight and/or be obtuse or be a little dictator about you're own widdle thread. I'll leave you to it.
 
You'd have to be intellectually challenged not to know who I was voting for--and at least one reason why--from what I posted. But I guess you just want to fight and/or be obtuse. I'll leave you to it.

Oh, I got that part. But you went and compared and contrasted with Trump anyway, i.e "big ball of noxious gas". None of that, was the rules. Only the positives. :cool:
 
Hillary has 30 years experience in Washington politics.
Trump is willing to shake up the status quo.

That's about it.

Read that as Hillary has been part of the problem for 30 years.

Trump is going to say and do things that neither side is going to like or wants to hear. He is going to piss people off on the left and right, which will be good. Time to burst their little D.C. bubble.

There are plenty of experienced politicians in D.C. and that's why government isn't working. Trump is the enema D.C. politics has needed for decades.
 
Oh, I got that part. But you went and compared and contrasted with Trump anyway, i.e "big ball of noxious gas". None of that, was the rules. Only the positives. :cool:

Rules? I don't give a fuck for your view of what rules you think you can set for a porn board thread. :rolleyes:

Give yourself a dick pic. Make it a precious pretentious one. :D
 
Last edited:
1 - Trump actually is going to improve the USA's ridiculous immigration policy, and make it EASIER to LEGALLY immigrate to the US. If you have a job waiting for you, and you are not merely a leech masquerading as a refugee.

2 - Trump is the last person the DC establishment want anywhere near them. They don't know his rules, don't know how to "handle" him, he's going to throw a giant Klieg light on their bullshit. And I'm going to have the popcorn ready.

3 - Trump started with a good head start from his Daddy, unlike most NYC trust fund millionaire's he actually DID make something of himself. He's hardly the "failed" businessman. And until you actually try to start a business and make something of yourself, you have no idea how hard it actually is or what a toll it takes. For that he gets my respect.

4 - I never thought I would have a chance to run for public office. Mostly because I would make an ass of myself on Twitter daily. Trump has paved the way for me, haa haa! :D
 
Read that as Hillary has been part of the problem for 30 years.

Trump is going to say and do things that neither side is going to like or wants to hear. He is going to piss people off on the left and right, which will be good. Time to burst their little D.C. bubble.

There are plenty of experienced politicians in D.C. and that's why government isn't working. Trump is the enema D.C. politics has needed for decades.

*FISTBUMP*
 
1 - Trump actually is going to

I only read this far, because the thing is that none of us has a clue what Trump is "actually" going to do about anything. That's the central issue. He's flaky, has flip flopped constantly, and has failed miserably in either providing plans or the means by which he believably would achieve them. So, there's no reason to read your post further than that--because it all goes off the rails right there.

Where the politically naive go off the rails themselves is in believing that an individual can get anything done all by themselves. That's where both the Bernie and Donald supporters just don't have a clue--neither one of them have developed a path for garnering the support from those who get the work done to get anything they pontificate about done.
 
Hillary has 30 years experience in Washington politics.
Trump is willing to shake up the status quo.

That's about it.

You didn't mention which one you support and from your post I can't figure it out.

Hillary because Trump will be bad for US economy and trade. Especially trade. Canada needs a healthy US economy and openness to trade.
 
Back
Top