Insha-Allah

[Conager]

Creeps stick together.
No surprise here.

That's another word that you don't understand its proper usage. What is in any way creepy about what I just posted?

 

[hashtag45]

That's another word that you don't understand its proper usage. What is in any way creepy about what I just posted?

See my edit, creep

 

[Conager]

Because I don't force upon others my sexual fantasies about their butt-holes and I don't wish for one's kids to die in a fire,
dumbass

Unless you think the first is cool too, of course.

No one can force you to read anything here. You have frequently admitted that you troll people direct quote here: for fun end quote.

 

[hashtag45]

No one can force you to read anything here. You have frequently admitted that you troll people direct quote here: for fun end quote.

You're either a creep, or an imbecile.

 

[Conager]

See my edit, creep

Nothing in your edit is Illuminating and none of it pertains to me other than your assertion that birds of a feather flock together. In which case you got more than your own troubles in that regard.

You are truly an empty person aren't you?

 

[hashtag45]

Interesting to see how the sworn enemies : Que and Darbhinder (aka ThrobDownSouth. + Emerson40 all come together
when it comes to defending male Litizens right to cyberstalk female posters with all sorts of creepy sexual inuendoes.

I guess they Do have something in common, after all.

 

[Emerson40]

http://logos.textgiraffe.com/logos/logo-name/Emerson-designstyle-i-love-m.png

Yes, yes, yes. Your infatuation is well known and documented (daily).

http://41.media.tumblr.com/e4ed38a51f52a2c9ea74f0871015853a/tumblr_nn2nq3Dy6i1tp9qzgo1_500.jpg

As a distinguished, mature gentleman myself with an intact libido I struggled to figure out what point she consistently tries to make about your age and the fact that at your age you have sired children and still have sexual interest I find completely baffling that she finds that in any way remarkable.

I'm aware of some religious nuts that take vows of celibacy and I am also aware of other religious nuts who believe that sex is only for procreation. I know of no religious nuts that suggest that you should procreate and then adopt celibacy.

The only conclusion I could possibly draw is that no one ever explained to her where babies come from.

Perhaps that. There may also be issues with just seeing others being happy, and having things in their life (happiness, spouse, balance, family, healthy sex life, sense of humor, intelligence, etc) that hashy was never - for a multitude of reasons I'm sure - able to attain.

For some reason, hashy equates kids with dirty, deviant sex, which says a lot about his views on people having sex after having kids, and hashy's remarkable infatuation with anal (can't get pregnant).

Creeps stick together.
No surprise here.

New Emerson and Que morality: "Stalking female posters with inuendoes about them engaging in anal sex for an entire year is kool!
Those women have no right to whine! They should be flattered that such internet studs give them the time of the day!"

I'd ask you to provide links to back up your blather, but we know that won't happen. Goes against your histrionic drama llama ding-dong code.

////

 

[BotanyBoy]

Do you have the remotest fucking idea what the OP in this thread was about?

He doesn't care, he just wants to keep trying to convince people ACA is something other than Obama's 1%'er buddies in the insurance world fucking working class America up the ass with a nail spiked baseball bat.

The idea that (D)'s are anything other than altruistic angels sent form high up by GAWD herself to help and defend the working class from EVIL rich people that are NEVER (D)'s and always some brand of conservatives sends the poor simpleton in to grand mal fits of derp.

 

[RobDownSouth]

He doesn't care, he just wants to keep trying to convince people ACA is something other than Obama's 1%'er buddies in the insurance world fucking working class America up the ass with a nail spiked baseball bat.

The idea that (D)'s are anything other than altruistic angels sent form high up by GAWD herself to help and defend the working class from EVIL rich people that are NEVER (D)'s and always some brand of conservatives sends the poor simpleton in to grand mal fits of derp.

No Democrats EVAR measure up to your high standards.

'cept Bernie, amiright? Hmmm?

 

[sigh]

Tough time being a kid.

On one hand you have to be educated about sex and given all the proper precautionary materials based on the assumption that they're going to do it and then when they do, lower the boom on the male.

And pajama boi sits smugly on his couch sipping his cocoa and declaring that all men are rapists...

And that bastion of liberalism - Wisconsin - is leading the way. God willing.

But wait! The glow of red in my northern sky isn't the Aurora, is it?

 

[BotanyBoy]

No Democrats EVAR measure up to your high standards.

'cept Bernie, amiright? Hmmm?

No there are a number of Democrats that are quite respectable.

However the ones that lie to the working class in order to DIRECTLY whore them out to their billionaire buddies don't make that list.

I don't blindly buy everything (D) does as altruistic goodness and progress just because (D) in front of name. For me talking like a progressive, then acting just like Bush simply doesn't cut it for me. I'm sorry for the country that it's not only acceptable but encouraged by you and people like you.

Now show the 0.1% how much you love them and vote Hillary