Christobal
Mostly I'm comfortable
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2016
- Posts
- 3,470
That was different.
You were appropriating my culture.
![]()
![]()
Could you please define this and explain why it is wrong?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That was different.
You were appropriating my culture.
![]()
![]()
Hey...your use of "Chief" is a bit racist, don't you think?
How 'bout this Choctaw girl come kick your ass?![]()
Hey...your use of "Chief" is a bit racist, don't you think?
How 'bout this Choctaw girl come kick your ass?![]()
Yes it does have a history.
http://communityjournal.net/racial-history-of-milwaukee-from-1963-to-today/
I guess noted TV sheriff/world famous scolder of black people in front of white audiences David Clarke isn't the solution for everything that ails Milwaukee after all.
I guess noted TV sheriff/world famous scolder of black people in front of white audiences David Clarke isn't the solution for everything that ails Milwaukee after all.
That is 1/2 a history. How did it all get that way?
In the late 50's and through the 60's the economy was booming. The "boomers" were coming into their own. Detroit couldn't make cars fast enough. Same with refrigerators, etc. The rust belt states as well as some of the north-eastern states passed very liberal welfare acts. Wisconsin in particular was quite generous. So the unskilled, semi-skilled, and unemployed blacks in Chicago moved to Milwaukee. Wisconsin pitched a fit, as well they should. Those benefits were meant for their own citizens, not welfare refugees. There was an exodus of blacks from the south to the states with the generous benefits.
Soooo, the various senators in DC got together to pass the Federal welfare act. It was easy to get everyone on board. A standardized welfare system nation wide. It would stop the welfare refugees from running like locusts to which ever state paid the most. The exodus from the south stopped thus preserving the 'share cropper' economy in the agricultural belt. But the damage had already been done.
Whites left the cities in droves. They wanted mo part of the uneducated black culture that was evolving in their cities. Nor did they want their children going to school with unruly, fatherless, children. A culture that persists to this day that no parent with any means whatsoever would willingly subject their child to.
Those blacks that did elevated themselves to skilled jobs via education got their asses out of there too.
What was left behind was the unemployable or barely employable at best. The educational system didn't fail them so much as they turned their back on the system. (That be 'Whitey shit.') Crime became a way of life. Crime got you street cred., bling, and lengthy rap sheets.
Were the motives racist? On the part of the southern senators it certainly was. For the others it was just a case of fiscal responsibility.
But the fact remains that the black community can turn itself around at anytime it wants to. It merely takes the will and the willingness to face the fact that for the most part they are a product of their own creation. That they aren't so much victims as they are being used by a host of liberals, liberals of every race and creed. Just start cleaning up your neighborhood, one house at a time.
Ishmael
And then, as we learned in KC, the fix for this unintended consequence was to pull white kids out of their neighborhood schools, ship them into the inner city where they were treated as enemies while at the same time shipping the inner city out to the suburbs to ensure that no real learning could take place there as the culture of diversity quickly turned into a war zone where every black kid had a 'fro and a big-ass com whose handle was honed into a shiv...
no real learning could take place there as the culture of diversity quickly turned into a war zone where every black kid had a 'fro and a big-ass com whose handle was honed into a shiv...
Things You Don't Learn In The "Black People" Class Ishmeal Teaches, Part 675:
Redlining (1937- )
Redlining refers to a discriminatory pattern of disinvestment and obstructive lending practices that act as an impediment to home ownership among African Americans and other people of color. Banks used the concept to deny loans to homeowners and would-be homeowners who lived in these neighborhoods. This in turn resulted in neighborhood economic decline and the withholding of services or their provision at an exceptionally high cost.
The origin of the term stems from the policies developed by the Home Owners Loan Corporation (HOLC) created in 1933 by the Franklin Roosevelt Administration to reduce home foreclosures during the Depression and then institutionalized by the 1937 U.S. Housing Act which established the Federal Housing Association (FHA). Federal housing agencies including the HOLC and the FHA determined whether areas were deemed unfit for investment by banks, insurance companies, savings and loan associations, and other financial services companies. The areas were physically demarcated with red shading on a map. In contrast, zones which were to receive preferential lending status were marked in green shading and intermediate areas in blue shading. Often these decisions were arbitrarily based on the area’s racial composition rather than income levels. While the practice was almost universal before 1968, the Civil Rights Act passed that year theoretically outlawed redlining. Nonetheless its impact was felt long after that date. In a series of Pulitzer Prize winning articles which appeared in 1988 under the title “The Color of Money,” Atlanta Journal-Constitution reporter Bill Dedmen described how Atlanta banks still discriminated by the racial designation of neighborhoods. His article illustrated how these banks were nearly twice as likely to lend to homeowners and prospective home buyers in low-income white neighborhoods as in affluent black areas.
As a consequence of redlining, neighborhoods that local banks deemed unfit for investment were left underdeveloped or in disrepair. Attempts to improve these neighborhoods with even relatively small-scale business ventures were commonly obstructed by financial institutions that continued to label the underwriting as too risky or simply rejected them outright. When existing businesses collapsed, new ones were not allowed to replace them, often leaving entire blocks empty and crumbling. Consequently African Americans in those neighborhoods were frequently limited in their access to banking, healthcare, retail merchandise, and even groceries. One notable exception to this was (and still is) the proliferation of liquor stores and bars which seemingly transcended the area’s stigma of financial risk.
Redlining also led to an appreciable dearth of employment opportunities in these neighborhoods as prospective small scale employers were disinclined to locate there. Crime often followed in the wake of these declining neighborhoods making future investment less likely. These developments created a cycle which seemingly justified the initial redlining practices.
Sources:
Bill Dedmen, “The Color of Money,” The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, May 1, 1988; Jack M. Guttentag and Susan M. Wachter, Redlining and Public Policy (New York: New York University, 1980); Kenneth T. Jackson, Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985); Gregory D. Squires, ed., Insurance Redlining: Disinvestment, Reinvestment, and the Evolving Role of Financial Institutions (Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute Press 1997).
http://www.blackpast.org/aah/redlining-1937#sthash.C3T9Wum1.dpuf
http://38.media.tumblr.com/786f5ca688291184e01ae3102b742fbd/tumblr_inline_nooeadoVc41qfa8wb_500.gif
It's no fun when it's this easy.
Anyway, I understand the need to ignore your fellow card-carrying member's bullshit, lies, and racism.
BUT PREPOSITIONS!
You are missing a noun between "card carrying" and "members." Card carrying members of what organization?
I cannot imagine how you ever got the idea that grammar and spelling are a higher priority than expessing a cogent, relevant thought or that you of all people are the most qualified here to police that.
I'd be shocked to find that your scholastic acheivment was note-worthy.
Are you some sort of parrot, or just not thinking clearly?
The sheriff, no matter who they may be, has neither the authority nor the resources to FIX anything. Further, that's not his job.
Clark clearly has a handle on what the problem is and has so stated on numerous occasions. But his job is to enforce the law, not make policy or allocate the budgets associated with policy.
So ragging on the black guy for not doing what he isn't elected to do, and hasn't the authority to do, makes you look, well, small.
Ishmael
It's weird you view me as a Lit God.
BTW, 2 misspellings and a whole lot of unwarranted admiration.
Things You Don't Learn In The "Black People" Class Ishmeal Teaches, Part 675:
late as 1979, 15 large Milwaukee manufacturing companies reported that two-thirds of their black employees held low-paying, unskilled and semi-skilled jobs, compared to only 29% of their white counterparts. People of Color were winding up on the statistical short side of the emerging Gap Analyses, as pervasive racial discrimination appeared to persist throughout the city.
It's weird you view me as a Lit God.
BTW, 2 misspellings and a whole lot of unwarranted admiration.
Is he actually critiquing your pists in a serious manor?
I thought reading was actually part of a class. I don't think he actually read the article I posted.
These were working families, families with both parents in the home, that came to Milwaukee.
From the Wikipedia on police chief Ed Flynn-
...
In late 2011 his contract was renewed for an additional four years.[14] Flynn's second term marked the first time since 1863 that a Milwaukee police chief was reappointed..