Here's How Donald Trump Could Become President

[4est_4est_Gump]

As I said, eight years is a long time. Ever think of going to join miles?

I've been here since 1999 jackass.

I've seen hundreds of uninformed idiots such as yourself come and go.

I'll be here long after you've stopped bragging about how I am helping to pay for your preexisting condition even though you are rich enough to buy and sell me several times before breakfast.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

How many times did The Donald vote to send us to war in the Middle East?


How many Middle-Eastern countries has the Trumpster sent into a hellish tailspin of violence, death and oppression?


Oh, we don't care about that because he says hurtful things that we thought we had intimidated the other team into not saying...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

"Venezuela had a democracy, a constitution, you know, division of power in government, but people were not educated in the principles of freedom, and they vote for whoever promises more," Brimen warned. In the short 7-minute video, he laid out the history of Venezuela and how it became the way it is today.

The country had great promise and opportunity, especially in its vast oil reserves. "But as that wealth got into the hands of government, what was a great opportunity became actually a huge temptation, that disintegrated into corruption," the Venezuelan narrator explained. More government control of the economy resulted in inequalities, "where some would be exposed to international competition whereas others would be protected because they were friends with those in power."

This cronyism fostered social unrest, as prices rose and riots formed across the country. That's when Hugo Chavez showed up.

Which strong man will save us from Clinton cronyism?

https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/08/13/why-couldnt-what-happened-in-venezuela-happen-here/

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

The leader of Lebanon's militant Hezbollah group agreed with Donald Trump when he said President Obama founded ISIS.

"This is an American presidential candidate who is saying this. What he says is based on facts and documents," said Hassan Nasrallah, according to The Associated Press.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...-leader-backs-trumps-claim-that-obama-started

 

[Adre]

Go take a run in the fresh air, El Lardo. It'll clear your head and help bring down that inflated BMI.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Here's the only one here out of shape:

SSSSSSSshhhhh... be vewy vewy *gasp* qwiet. Ahm *weeze* huntin' *puff* wascaws...

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...-leader-backs-trumps-claim-that-obama-started

Sad that the writers of these articles you sometimes post links to don't get sarcasm.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Did I ever say it was sarcasm?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Did I ever say it was sarcasm?

No, which is why I'm disappointed in you for posting it and the writer for writing it.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

So, I never said it.


Do you have a point? Anything to add?


How much of the Iranian Obama cash do you think Hezbollah got?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

So, I never said it.


Do you have a point? Anything to add?


How much of the Iranian Obama cash do you think Hezbollah got?

No one said you said it.

My point was very clear, I'm disappointed in the writers for missing the sarcasm and I'm disappointed in you for posting articles to writers who didn't get the sarcasm.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

None of that has anything to do with me.

Why don't you write your allies over at Hezbollah and explain sarcasm to them?

I guess that's what you do when you cannot prove they are wrong about President Obama's founding community organizing for ISIS.

I never said anything about sarcasm. Sarcasm is not grounds for impeachment of a claim. So, if you think they guy is wrong, develop a cogent argument other than your party's meme of the moment. You do not have a clear point.

 

[Sean]

It's quite telling how much time AJ the not Republican puts into defending the Republican nominee for president.

 

[Disgustipated]

It's quite telling how much time AJ the not Republican puts into defending the Republican nominee for president.

No, no, no. AJ is just a soldier in the war against Americans through the MMS and enlightening us on the Lit.

Or something.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

None of that has anything to do with me.

Why don't you write your allies over at Hezbollah and explain sarcasm to them?

I guess that's what you do when you cannot prove they are wrong about President Obama's founding community organizing for ISIS.

I never said anything about sarcasm. Sarcasm is not grounds for impeachment of a claim. So, if you think they guy is wrong, develop a cogent argument other than your party's meme of the moment. You do not have a clear point.

You posted it.

My point is clear, you just don't like it.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

You have no point.


And yes I posted it because it reflects what I had said about Obama creating ISIS.


Sarcasm is Democrat silliness.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

You have no point.


And yes I posted it because it reflects what I had said about Obama creating ISIS.


Sarcasm is Democrat silliness.

Awesome, so we established that it does have to do with you because you posted it.

The excerpt you posted doesn't say Hassan Nasrallah agrees with you, it says he agrees with Trump, and Trump only said that Obama founded ISIS sarcastically. I'm disappointed that the writer of the article you linked wasn't able to note Trump's obvious sarcasm.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Now you prove you don't have a point.


Nice.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Now you prove you don't have a point.


Nice.

I'm going to disagree with you. I'm going to maintain you simply don't like how what I said reflects on you so you're trying to dismiss what I said out of hand instead of looking at the merits of what I've said.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

While this is true, there are other mitigating factors to consider. The first is, all we were told for eight years was how bad Bush was, how disastrous Bush was, how stupid Bush was and Obama was going to come in, like a breath of fresh air and was going to undo and mitigate all of Bush's stupidity and error, yet he seemed to learn not one thing from the errors of Bush and he allowed them to stand.

Now, we all have our theories on why he did that. You say, his hands were tied. That is debatable. I say he wanted failure in Iraq in order to end the era of nation-building and exporting Democracy (not to mention the big Democrat I told you so that had been ongoing ever since they voted for the invasion). As we saw when the thing began to fall apart, the Liberals here started arguing, those people hate each other, they're animals (almost as if the considered them [in chipbutty's words] sub-human [sic]) and we should just let them kill each other. Instead of letting them kill each other, Obama has engaged in McNamaraesque gradual buildup in Irag and Libya, an indirect admission of failure to which we can add, like his ignored Syrian red line, he has virtually ignored his timeline for withdrawal from Iraq, so maybe he is capable of learning from failure, but I kind of doubt it, it's more likely he just wants the can down the road to tarnish whoever else is next in line, since he has already taken his victory laps on all fronts Islamic.

I would argue that the agreement, in face of actual reality would easily be renegotiated had it been his desire. All he would have had to do was lay down the gauntlet and tell the Iraqi government, if you want our continued aid, if you want the implied continual protection of the US against your regional enemy Iran, then you will simply agree to the hold harmless agreement and allow us to keep troops based in Iraq and thus guarantee stability.

But no. His arrogance and surety, surety not earned and as we learned, in 2008, we were told that he was qualified to lead and to govern because he had run a successful campaign and that was his sole qualifying achievement. So, he created a power vacuum in the region which ISIS rushed in to fill and attempt the creation of a Caliphate.

Did he found them?

No.

Did he enable them?

Yes. The Democrats own ISIS lock, stock and barrel...

You have no point.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

You have no point.


And yes I posted it because it reflects what I had said about Obama creating ISIS.


Sarcasm is Democrat silliness.

You have no point.

No.

Which one is it? Did Obama create ISIS or not? You can't seem to create a clear point on this.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Here you go tou:

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/6...t-since-1988/article/2599203?custom_click=rss

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

What I said is what I said.

What Trump said is what Trump said.

What the Hezbollah leader said was what he said.

Trying to talk to me about this supercilious subject of sarcasm is stupid.

It has nothing to do with anything other than politics.

There are no points in this type of politics.

I suppose that's your main attraction.

Someone said it was sarcasm, so anyone who talks about it must be speaking sarcastically. You're in your best Junior-High debate form today...

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

What I said is what I said.

What Trump said is what Trump said.

What the Hezbollah leader said was what he said.

Trying to talk to me about this supercilious subject of sarcasm is stupid.

It has nothing to do with anything other than politics.

There are no points in this type of politics.

I suppose that's your main attraction.

Someone said it was sarcasm, so anyone who talks about it must be speaking sarcastically. You're in your best Junior-High debate form today...

Now you finally get my point. You don't understand sarcasm and quote writers who don't understand sarcasm.

I wasn't asking about what anyone said but YOU. Great job of avoiding the question.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

You asked a question?