Transgendereism

Some of your Blurt pals… They're angry lesbians who get angry with any chick who doesn't put out for them.
Well, that's the impression I've got, after they kept chasing my ass with pots and pans.
 
Some of your Blurt pals… They're angry lesbians who get angry with any chick who doesn't put out for them.
Well, that's the impression I've got, after they kept chasing my ass with pots and pans.

But you're a fucking moron, your impressions are always wrong. It's become axiomatic how wrong you are about everything.
 
But you're a fucking moron, your impressions are always wrong. It's become axiomatic how wrong you are about everything.

Come one, moron, LTR is -blatantly, on a regular basis- flirting with and making passes at the titties from the Tuesday Titties thread, and you pretend not to see it?
 
Come one, moron, LTR is -blatantly, on a regular basis- flirting with and making passes at the titties from the Tuesday Titties thread, and you pretend not to see it?

Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahaahha!
 
Come one, moron, LTR is -blatantly, on a regular basis- flirting with and making passes at the titties from the Tuesday Titties thread, and you pretend not to see it?

Yep, you got me. I am a total lesbian.

I should have known I couldnt hide it from someone as smart as you.
 
What did I post that was so alarming the thread is now about me? I assume it was something based on fact as opposed to emotions.
 
There are advocates in the gay community that swear it's inherited in spite of there being no scientific evidence to support the claim. As far as I'm concerned gay is just a sexual preference, no mental disorder associated with preference.

Trannyism, on the other hand, IS a mental disorder. Anytime someone believes that they are something they are not you are dealing with a mental disorder. And in extreme cases (not restricted to transsexual behavior) it becomes a mental illness.

But most of the posters to this thread just don't seem to get is the fact that if one president can wave his pen around like a royal scepter issuing decrees that have no basis in law, so can another. And it will happen. When some future president issues a decree that they disagree with they'll be screaming like the stuck pigs a great many of them behave as and wonder how in the world did we ever get to this state of affairs?

Ishmael

In the US homosexuality was a mental disorder until it was removed from the DSM in the early 1970s.
 
In the US homosexuality was a mental disorder until it was removed from the DSM in the early 1970s.

In the last study on the topic that I have seen, over 40% of gay men reported childhood molestation by a male. If ones sexuality is born from trama, isn't that a disorder?
 
In the US homosexuality was a mental disorder until it was removed from the DSM in the early 1970s.

That was a redundant post, wasn't it?

Are you saying that in some future definition of 'normalcy' people who fantasize that they are something they aren't will be considered 'normal?'
Hucows?' 'Hepups?' Where do you draw the line? We'll sanction people that don't believe your fantasy if your fantasy is this, but if your fantasy is that we're going to institutionalize you.

The sad thing about that is that I can actually envision a future, that if current trends remain unchecked, where the inmates do indeed run the asylum.

Ishmael
 
In the last study on the topic that I have seen, over 40% of gay men reported childhood molestation by a male. If ones sexuality is born from trama, isn't that a disorder?

I'm curious (about the study) in the same study how many straight males reported being molested by a man or woman?
 
That was a redundant post, wasn't it?

Are you saying that in some future definition of 'normalcy' people who fantasize that they are something they aren't will be considered 'normal?'
Hucows?' 'Hepups?' Where do you draw the line? We'll sanction people that don't believe your fantasy if your fantasy is this, but if your fantasy is that we're going to institutionalize you.

The sad thing about that is that I can actually envision a future, that if current trends remain unchecked, where the inmates do indeed run the asylum.

Ishmael

I love how for you science is this magical thing that means whatever you want to whenever it's convenient for you to want to believe something.
 
In the last study on the topic that I have seen, over 40% of gay men reported childhood molestation by a male. If ones sexuality is born from trama, isn't that a disorder?

That's a rather extensively researched phenomenon.

There's a good site that lists pro/con/neutral studies on that topic

Pro/Con: Can Childhood Sexual Abuse Cause Homosexuality?

I found it interesting that many of the sites that cite studies that child sexual abuse cause homosexuality are fringe right sites such as the "Family Research Council".
 
That was a redundant post, wasn't it?

Are you saying that in some future definition of 'normalcy' people who fantasize that they are something they aren't will be considered 'normal?'
Hucows?' 'Hepups?' Where do you draw the line? We'll sanction people that don't believe your fantasy if your fantasy is this, but if your fantasy is that we're going to institutionalize you.

The sad thing about that is that I can actually envision a future, that if current trends remain unchecked, where the inmates do indeed run the asylum.

Ishmael

I'm saying gender identity is a far more complex issue than you appear to think it is. And your fetish analogy is not on point on that issue.
 
I'm saying gender identity is a far more complex issue than you appear to think it is. And your fetish analogy is not on point on that issue.

Its about to become a political team, and crushed.
 
You can't buy this shit.
They're morons.


There are advocates in the gay community that swear it's inherited in spite of there being no scientific evidence to support the claim. As far as I'm concerned gay is just a sexual preference, no mental disorder associated with preference.

Trannyism, on the other hand, IS a mental disorder. Anytime someone believes that they are something they are not you are dealing with a mental disorder. And in extreme cases (not restricted to transsexual behavior) it becomes a mental illness.

If one uses the term "mental disorder" a a pretext to discriminate against gay or transgender individuals : I'm out.
But re those who genuinely wonder about these issues without other nefarious purposes in mind : I'm slightly inclined that way too. Because on the face of it, they both go against what "mother nature's purpose", so to speak when she endowed us with specific sex chromosomes and sex organs.

1.For me, Homosexuality is Not a mental disorder, because: it does not affect one's ability to function. And society's refusal to accept them is the main cause of distress or depression experienced bysome individuals.

2.Gender identity - as much as I'm convinced that we Shouldn't view it as a mental disorder, I can certainly understand where some conservatives are coming from.
Having hormonal treatment, for instance can cause significant side effects and impairment.


Are you saying that in some future definition of 'normalcy' people who fantasize that they are something they aren't will be considered 'normal?'
Where do you draw the line?
The sad thing about that is that I can actually envision a future, that if current trends remain unchecked, where the inmates do indeed run the asylum.
No one contests the fact that anti-discrimination campaigns are needed, given that transgender individuals are often discriminated against and are victims of hate crimes.

But the way in which politicians (instead of people who have a clue) are trying to "normalize" gender identity problems is mind-blowing. I haven't read as many dumb and leading statements as I've read from the american liberal press. Let alone preaching these things to immature minds such as kids.

I bet that in the next few years, the incidence of "newly diagnosed kids with GID" will sky-rocket as a result of these superficial and leading campaigns.
 
Last edited:
But the way in which politicians (instead of people who have a clue) are trying to "normalize" gender identity problems is mind-blowing. I haven't read as many dumb and leading statements as I've read from the american liberal press. Let alone preaching these things to immature minds such as kids.

I'd love to read those statements, do you have a link to share the articles?
 
I'm curious (about the study) in the same study how many straight males reported being molested by a man or woman?

That's a rather extensively researched phenomenon.

There's a good site that lists pro/con/neutral studies on that topic

Pro/Con: Can Childhood Sexual Abuse Cause Homosexuality?

I found it interesting that many of the sites that cite studies that child sexual abuse cause homosexuality are fringe right sites such as the "Family Research Council".

I wouldn't know, I don't read those sites. Too religious for me, an atheist.

I can no longer access the study but here is the abstract:

Abstract
In research with 942 nonclinical adult participants, gay men and lesbian women reported a significantly higher rate of childhood molestation than did heterosexual men and women. Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. Twenty-two percent of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women reported homosexual molestation. This research is apparently the first survey that has reported substantial homosexual molestation of girls. Suggestions for future research were offered.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11501300

I used to get these for free on this site, back when I worked for an eductional publisher:

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1010243318426
 
Last edited:
I'd love to read those statements, do you have a link to share the articles?
No need for that. Just do a search of the GB within the last week.
It's full of links to articles reflecting dumbfounding unilateral decisions or statements made by politicians and schools, and of uninformed statements made by some of the Lit. libs.
 
Back
Top