Transgendereism

[Disgustipated]

This thread lacks comprehension, reading and memory. FFS, you fuckers are wrong about half your damn posts.

Good thing Luk "Hair Club" Atmydyk is here to correct your posts!

So if I choose to be offended by what somebody says they should be fined?

I'm highly offended by your stupidity, and I'm going to call the police.

Try reading it again. That's the exact opposite of what that sentence states.

You're welcome.

 

[Lancecastor]

Are you happy and well-adjusted?

And how about our Top 2 actual lesbians...wq and pink?

Happy and well adjusted?

I think the non cisgendered are unhappy because of their fucked up nomenclature.

 

[phrodeau]

Has anyone here ever met a happy, well-adjusted transexual?

I know several.

 

[Saint Peter]

And how about our Top 2 actual lesbians...wq and pink?

Happy and well adjusted?

I think the non cisgendered are unhappy because of their fucked up nomenclature.

Deflection!

Happy is as Happy does.

 

[NOIRTRASH]

Especially when calling someone who is scientifically male a title associated with the male species or vice versa. Perhaps we should all switch to the title Human instead of Mr or Mrs. That would be more inclusive. Unless someone identifies as an alien. In which case we are fucked and out some money.

I have no problem calling someone who was once a man "Miss" if that's what he/she wants to be called. No more skin off my donger. But if you can't see the problem with fining people for calling someone a pronoun that is scientifically acceptable, you're kind of a fucking idiot.

Most of my psychotherapy training was based on the Gestalt principles championed by Fritz Perls MD. That is, ALL THERE IS IS ME AND YOU AND ALL THE NONSENSE WE IMAGINE. And ITS OKAY TO WANNA BE LIKE NAPOLEON, AND INSANITY TO SAY "I AM NAPOLEON."

The modern milieu is pure insanity.

 

[Lancecastor]

I know several.

Several?

Give us a sense of scale.... Do you live in an all-trans building, for example?

 

[aburner]

According to the The Charlotte Observer, girls having to view male genitalia in their bathrooms/locker rooms is not nearly so awful as they imagine, and they're just going to have to accept and get used to it for the sake of - wait for it - EQUALITY:

This is what the Obama administration nudged the rest of the country toward Friday. Yes, the thought of male genitalia in girls’ locker rooms – and vice versa – might be distressing to some. But the battle for equality has always been in part about overcoming discomfort – with blacks sharing facilities, with gays sharing marriage – then realizing that it was not nearly so awful as some people imagined.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/opinion/editorials/article77475147.html#storylink=cpy

 

[Ramone45]

I wonder if these issues with transgenderism are getting lumped in to the "slippery slope" that people were concerned about when they let homosexuals "marry" each other.
Gender Fluidity is coming down the pike any minute now.
There would be no justification for rejecting the legitimacy of that condition.
I can understand why some people wonder where this is going to end.

 

[RobDownSouth]

I wonder if these issues with transgenderism are getting lumped in to the "slippery slope" that people were concerned about when they let homosexuals "marry" each other.
Gender Fluidity is coming down the pike any minute now.
There would be no justification for rejecting the legitimacy of that condition.
I can understand why some people wonder where this is going to end.

Perhaps you could share with us how Gender Fluidity adversely affects the quality of your life.

Personally, I've got no issue with trannies, but then I haven't had a whole lot of interaction with them.

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

I wonder if these issues with transgenderism are getting lumped in to the "slippery slope" that people were concerned about when they let homosexuals "marry" each other.
Gender Fluidity is coming down the pike any minute now.
There would be no justification for rejecting the legitimacy of that condition.
I can understand why some people wonder where this is going to end.

The end game is Totalitarianism. That's where it is going to end.

 

[Ramone45]

Perhaps you could share with us how Gender Fluidity adversely affects the quality of your life.

Personally, I've got no issue with trannies, but then I haven't had a whole lot of interaction with them.

Well, the thing I would be concerned about is a perv declaring gender fluidity and going into the women's locker room. There would be absolutely no basis from counter-acting that behavior.

 

[hashtag45]

You're talking to brick walls. Believe me, I tried that argument and even female posters disagreed.

The only way to make them change their minds is to claim that you identify as female, and then go into one of their toilets and pee on the toilet seats and spray the walls.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

You're talking to brick walls. Believe me, I tried that argument and even female posters disagreed.

The only way to make them change their minds is to claim that you identify as female, and then go into one of their toilets and pee on the toilet seats and spray the walls.

Under the new North Carolina law what you're defining as a woman will be forced to go to the ladies's restroom, and once there they could take out their penis and urinate on the seats. So what's your point?

 

[hashtag45]

Under the new North Carolina law what you're defining as a woman will be forced to go to the ladies's restroom, and once there they could take out their penis and urinate on the seats. So what's your point?

Oh goodie, he's on my case again.

 

[Disgustipated]

Still nothing on what these nefarious evil-doers have to gain by unleashing these hysteria-inciting laws to the masses?

ETA: Oh, and the media. Their gains?

 

[Ishmael]

^^^^^^

It's pretty pathetic when someone has to make up alts because their know that the person they're trying to insult has their main on ignore.

Even more so when they profess themselves to be mind readers.

Ishmael

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Wikipedia is crowd sourced. Since I don't follow the crowd, I don't follow the link. You will never convince me with this "everybody says so" line of reasoning. Following me with silly links in order to make yourself feel good and to signal you are a Good Person is a waste of my time and yours.

A more proper reply is that as a group grows larger, it is inundated with lesser minds who use the power of numbers only to self-validate; look, I'm competent, I belong to abc123, you can trust me! I'm a member in good standing. But those few "intellectuals" at the top claim to speak for the whole group.

The truth is that the whole group is not homogenous and a lot of them go along to get along just for the prestige value of the group and rarely, if ever actually interact or moderate their leadership which is then free to play politics. A smaller group is much more likely to be of similar mind based on open and honest debate.

This is why, when the internet pointed out how much in bed the AARP was with the democrats politically, that many people left it and created smaller groups that have less of a Socialist ideology driving them. Because they are fewer in membership, does not make them wrong on any political issue any more than it makes their benefit packages less of a value to their members.

Remember, at one time, only one man was brave enough to postulate that the sun, not the earth, was the center of the solar system. The numbers did not make him wrong.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

^^^^^^

It's pretty pathetic when someone has to make up alts because their know that the person they're trying to insult has their main one ignore.

Even more so when they profess themselves to be mind readers.

Ishmael

It is cowardice pure and simple.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

So, I watched the Megyn Kelly special of FOX network...



She interviewed a "famous" transgender actress (actually a transvestite, but the Progressive social justice warrior loves to change the language, bending it to its needs). Well he/she/it has an identical twin brother. Identical means, from the same egg...



So why is he straight if it is DNA driven?

 

[Ishmael]

So, I watched the Megyn Kelly special of FOX network...



She interviewed a "famous" transgender actress (actually a transvestite, but the Progressive social justice warrior loves to change the language, bending it to its needs). Well he/she/it has an identical twin brother. Identical means, from the same egg...



So why is he straight if it is DNA driven?

A little swerve off topic there bro. but no body but the gay community has ever claimed that gayness or trannyism is hereditary.

Ishmael

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

No, I have seen in this thread that it cannot be mental illness because a person cannot overcome their "wiring."

Sex has become amorphous, no one can define it, no one can deny the identity of another and no one can dare say that deciding that you are a woman trapped in a man's body is anything but a normative, biological state, and that means it's your DNA, heredity beats environment.

Are we still not seeking the "gay" gene?

 

[Saint Peter]

A little swerve off topic there bro. but no body but the gay community has ever claimed that gayness or trannyism is hereditary.

Ishmael

I blame Facebook.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

So, I watched the Megyn Kelly special of FOX network...



She interviewed a "famous" transgender actress (actually a transvestite, but the Progressive social justice warrior loves to change the language, bending it to its needs). Well he/she/it has an identical twin brother. Identical means, from the same egg...



So why is he straight if it is DNA driven?

For the same reason that identical twins aren't carbon copies of each other physically or mentally. It seems you know as much about genetics as you do about most other subjects, little to nothing.

 

[Que]

^^^^^^

It's pretty pathetic when someone has to make up alts because their know that the person they're trying to insult has their main on ignore.

Even more so when they profess themselves to be mind readers.

Ishmael

Another of the tells of a RobDownSouth alt is that once he has beaten off congratulating himself on "wounding" someone on his "avowed enemies list," he forgets that if the alt were not him, he would be gleefully piling on, not oddly silent with his main ID.

 

[Ishmael]

No, I have seen in this thread that it cannot be mental illness because a person cannot overcome their "wiring."

Sex has become amorphous, no one can define it, no one can deny the identity of another and no one can dare say that deciding that you are a woman trapped in a man's body is anything but a normative, biological state, and that means it's your DNA, heredity beats environment.

Are we still not seeking the "gay" gene?

There are advocates in the gay community that swear it's inherited in spite of there being no scientific evidence to support the claim. As far as I'm concerned gay is just a sexual preference, no mental disorder associated with preference.

Trannyism, on the other hand, IS a mental disorder. Anytime someone believes that they are something they are not you are dealing with a mental disorder. And in extreme cases (not restricted to transsexual behavior) it becomes a mental illness.

But most of the posters to this thread just don't seem to get is the fact that if one president can wave his pen around like a royal scepter issuing decrees that have no basis in law, so can another. And it will happen. When some future president issues a decree that they disagree with they'll be screaming like the stuck pigs a great many of them behave as and wonder how in the world did we ever get to this state of affairs?

Ishmael