Men using womens bathrooms used to be called sexual harassment and indecent exposure

Related: “How did we get to this absurd place? You won’t go wrong if you point your finger at the [Obama] administration,” Clarice Feldman writes at the American Thinker in an article titled “The War On Women Moves to Restrooms.” As Feldman writes, “To accommodate the perceived wishes of a very small number of people, the federal government and many states are placing women and girls at risk of rape and assault in restrooms.
 
What's amazing is that the majority of GLBTQ people have been using public restrooms with no problem all this time.
 
Bathroom Bill Sponsor is a Convicted Sex Offender Who Molested Boys


The brouhaha in North Carolina over efforts in the City of Charlotte to allow mentally ill transgendered people to use restroom facilities that are designated as those opposite of their birth gender faced a strange twist when it was discovered that the man behind leading the charge for the bill is not only a sodomite, but also a convicted sex offender.
 
Charges were filed Tuesday against a man who wore a wig and women’s clothing to disguise himself as he allegedly used a concealed camera to record “hours” of video of women in a Los Angeles-area department store restroom.

Jason Pomare, 33, of Palmdale, was arrested Saturday after customers contacted security officers at a Macy’s store to report a man in the women’s restroom. The security officers contacted a deputy, who was on patrol at the Antelope Valley Mall (map) when he saw a man matching the subject’s description leave the store.

When the deputy found the man hiding in a mall storage area, the subject was wearing a wig, women’s clothing and bra, according to a statement from the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department.

“The deputy noticed he was wearing a wig and appeared to have breasts,” said Sgt. Brian Hudson, of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department.

Pomare was charged Tuesday with six counts of unlawful use of a concealed camera for purposes of sexual gratification. After his arrest, investigators said a video camera found in his purse had “hours” of video of women using the restroom inside the store.

from todays news
 
See? California doesn't need a bathroom law. The current system works.
 
now its called

SOCIAL JUSTICE:rolleyes:
Call it what you like - I call it stupid

from todays news

From today's news in 2013 - before any of this shit started.
It's the hysteria of people like that is causing the problem, not transgender people. Transgender people have been using the bathroom for years without incident. As you've already cited, laws already existing to cover snooping and sexual harrassment. Glad we're agreed on that :)
 
See? California doesn't need a bathroom law. The current system works.

NC is already seeing perhaps millions of dollars in lost revenue from corporations and tourists who will boycott the state because of their backwards intolerant "religious liberty" laws. Now there's a double talk misleading way to spearhead hate and intolerance. Dominionists like Ted Cruz want to set up laws like this.
 
NC is already seeing perhaps millions of dollars in lost revenue from corporations and tourists who will boycott the state because of their backwards intolerant "religious liberty" laws. Now there's a double talk misleading way to spearhead hate and intolerance. Dominionists like Ted Cruz want to set up laws like this.

what HATE and INTOLERANCE:confused:
 
I have predicted for years one of the ultimate "end games" of the femanist movement was the elimination of sexually segregated bathrooms. I would tell people that's one of their longterm goals, and people would say no way, not going to happen, it will be women who will never stand for this. Women will the ones to stop this, it will never happen.

Well I guess I was right after all. I don't think anyone ever saw this would be pushed through as part of the gay agenda though. Liberals aren't dumb though (at least not the leaders of the movement, the rank and file generally are). They can look at polls and see that 70% of the public has a negative view of feminism, but a majority now has been conditioned to support ANY demand of the gay movement. They don't like femanists but they love gays, so phrase it as a "gay issue" and the public will if not support it at least not join in any "reactionary" efforts to oppose it.
 
Back
Top