NOAA Radiosonde Data Shows No Warming For 58 Years

[Busybody]

http://realclimatescience.com/2016/03/noaa-radiosonde-data-shows-no-warming-for-58-years/

Billions wasted

Billions MOAR to be wasted

Of course, the CORP LIB PIG must be fed

 

[LIVINRFANTASIES]

Our politicians lied?

Next they'll try to tell us the earth is not flat!

 

[Busybody]

where is the outrage of billions down teh drain

coal mines and workers losing jobs?

WHERE?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Looks like you're going to have to take me off ignore...



Talk about shooting yourself in the foot!

 

[Busybody]

So

Something that doesn't exist

Is the most crucial national security issue we face

And Libz n Dumz believe this shit

 

[miles]

But Obama is the smartest person in the room!

 

[miles]

I'm sure the lame stream media will be all over this story.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I'm sure the lame stream media will be all over this story.

The official rebuttal...



OH YES THERE WAS!!!

It's just hiding deep in the oceans...

When it emerges...

GO GO GODZILLA!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T65rW_SIzg0

 

[miles]

The biggest hoax in the history of the world...

 

[nerfhearder]

Without taking a stand either way, some dudes blog is not something that anyone is going to take seriously without something other than some dudes blog. I mean the guy is a geologist and electrical engineer and has already been proven to be wrong about his anti-warming shit.
Just because someone agrees with you doesn't make them right. I think you two especially will find that many you agree with are pretty freaking dumb.

 

[miles]

Without taking a stand either way, some dudes blog is not something that anyone is going to take seriously without something other than some dudes blog. I mean the guy is a geologist and electrical engineer and has already been proven to be wrong about his anti-warming shit.
Just because someone agrees with you doesn't make them right. I think you two especially will find that many you agree with are pretty freaking dumb.

Next time read the article. The data is from the NOAA, not "some dude's blog."

Obviously you have no clue what the NOAA is.

 

[nerfhearder]

Next time read the article. The data is from the NOAA, not "some dude's blog."

Obviously you have no clue what the NOAA is.

Sorry. I meant the three of you. I forgot you were bound to show up.

 

[miles]

A newbie AND a douche.

What were the odds?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Without taking a stand either way, some dudes blog is not something that anyone is going to take seriously without something other than some dudes blog. I mean the guy is a geologist and electrical engineer and has already been proven to be wrong about his anti-warming shit.
Just because someone agrees with you doesn't make them right. I think you two especially will find that many you agree with are pretty freaking dumb.

A subjective valuation on both parts.

My training is in meteorology and my degrees are in Computer Science and Mathematics. In the former, my specialized training was databases, telecommunications bandwidth and queue modeling for banks, which allowed me to look at the code and assumptions and easily dismiss the "science" of models where the "scientists" were making the assumptions to the model that would garner them governmental funding.

In the early 2000s Ishmael and I were calling bullshit, and the predictions of the time simply did not come true.

Two things have to be proved, the first being that some warming as bad and the second that CO2 is a leading and not a lagging indicator. Keep in mind, the very tiny parts per million of atmospheric gasses that we are addressing here.

 

[nerfhearder]

A newbie AND a douche.

What were the odds?

Probably the same odds on you actually putting me on ignore after twice saying you were.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

A newbie AND a douche.

What were the odds?

Not the right approach at this point.

Engagement is the key until actual religiosity is discerned...

 

[nerfhearder]

A subjective valuation on both parts.

My training is in meteorology and my degrees are in Computer Science and Mathematics. In the former, my specialized training was databases, telecommunications bandwidth and queue modeling for banks, which allowed me to look at the code and assumptions and easily dismiss the "science" of models where the "scientists" were making the assumptions to the model that would garner them governmental funding.

In the early 2000s Ishmael and I were calling bullshit, and the predictions of the time simply did not come true.

Two things have to be proved, the first being that some warming as bad and the second that CO2 is a leading and not a lagging indicator. Keep in mind, the very tiny parts per million of atmospheric gasses that we are addressing here.

Again, sorry. Four of you. I totally forgot that Ishmael guy.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Again, sorry. Four of you. I totally forgot that Ishmael guy.

So, your are unimpressed with my credentials to speak on the topic.



Just what are yours??? Note: I am staying polite.

 

[nerfhearder]

So, your are unimpressed with my credentials to speak on the topic.



Just what are yours??? Note: I am staying polite.

No, I'm not impressed. Anyone can be anything on here. I don't claim or give any of my own for that same reason. Maybe I'm a genius Navy SEAL with billions of dollars, multiple degrees in a wide range of subjects and a huge cock.
Or maybe I'm not.
You have an opinion, that's it. I have one, too. Maybe my opinion matches yours, maybe it doesn't. Either way the thread and that link are bullshit.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

No, I'm not impressed. Anyone can be anything on here. I don't claim or give any of my own for that same reason. Maybe I'm a genius Navy SEAL with billions of dollars, multiple degrees in a wide range of subjects and a huge cock.
Or maybe I'm not.
You have an opinion, that's it. I have one, too. Maybe my opinion matches yours, maybe it doesn't. Either way the thread and that link are bullshit.

I see. Even though I have been pretty consistent since 1999 i who and what I am.

Ok.

That fact that you answer like that tells me that you are a little intimidated. Tell me why it is bullshit in the most educated manner that you can muster. I would be interested in a good conversation rather that a Trump-Rubio exchange...

You're stupid!

NO! you're stupid!

No really what's say?

DUDE! What does mine say?

SWEET!. but really what does mine say?

DUDE! tell me, before I kick your ass. what does mine say???

:ensuing scuffle:

 

[nerfhearder]

I see. Even though I have been pretty consistent since 1999 i who and what I am.

Ok.

That fact that you answer like that tells me that you are a little intimidated. Tell me why it is bullshit in the most educated manner that you can muster. I would be interested in a good conversation rather that a Trump-Rubio exchange...

You're stupid!

NO! you're stupid!

No really what's say?

DUDE! What does mine say?

SWEET!. but really what does mine say?

DUDE! tell me, before I kick your ass. what does mine say???

:ensuing scuffle:

I'm not interested in a real conversation with you or anyone else who's been in this thread so far. Not on any subject. If it strokes your ego to think it's because I am intimidated then have at it. Makes no difference to me.
I find you and your group to be mostly stupid and probably liars. I'm not going to back it up or link anything or discuss it with you. I guess you're gonna have to live with it.

 

[miles]

Not the right approach at this point.

Engagement is the key until actual religiosity is discerned...

Pfffffft....gimme a break.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I'm not interested in a real conversation with you or anyone else who's been in this thread so far. Not on any subject. If it strokes your ego to think it's because I am intimidated then have at it. Makes no difference to me.
I find you and your group to be mostly stupid and probably liars. I'm not going to back it up or link anything or discuss it with you. I guess you're gonna have to live with it.

But what do you base your claim on?

The fact that you disagree with the premise?

That is purely subjective, maybe even pure belief, if you cannot explain why.

If you want me to just live with it, then I have to lean towards a passionate, almost religious belief in global warming.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Pfffffft....gimme a break.

I think that it is better, when engaging a new person on an old, very old, topic, that it is very important to keep an open mind and an open gate to neighborly dialog...



Maybe it's just me at this point. Maybe we are in the trenches of WWI France at this point.

 

[miles]

There you have it.

He isn't interested in a "real" conversation on ANY subject.

Keep trying to engage and educate someone who refuses to listen.

Rotsa ruck.