Anti Abortionists Behind Planned Parenthood Vidoes Indicted

[ms_ann_thrope]

Well, that is almost amusing.

Do tell, what is your solution? Every pregnancy should be carried to term no exceptions, against people's will because you say so, but you'll offer them zero assistance what so ever?

What about a little personal responsibility up front? It's not rocket science. Put sperm in a vagina and you make a baby. What's a rubber cost?

 

[Aglaopheme]

What about a little personal responsibility up front? It's not rocket science. Put sperm in a vagina and you make a baby. What's a rubber cost?

Great idea. Why people could get birth control at Planned Parenthood!

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

Great idea. Why people could get birth control at Planned Parenthood!

I can get birth control at Walgreens. Why inflate the price through government bureaucracy 10 fold?

 

[phrodeau]

I can get birth control at Walgreens. Why inflate the price through government bureaucracy 10 fold?

Because the religious right doesn't want insurance companies covering the cost.

 

[sigh]

Ms. Anderson said in the statement that grand jurors had cleared Planned Parenthood of any wrongdoing.

I guess murder is ok now.

No, murder is still illegal.

Nice job of deflecting the conversation away from the point that Planned Parenthood has done nothing wrong, and all the hoopla that flooded the media in the wake of the videos was just bullshit and spin. As in manufactured, made up, not real. You know, lies. And Breitbart, Rush and all the rest whipped it into a frenzy (with the support of our lovely MSM), and it filtered down all through the blog-o-sphere and is now so entrenched that there's no doubt that a great many will never believe the story isn't true.

Does anyone expect any of those blight-wing media guys to print a retraction? Or will they just bluster forward, changing the argument by redefining legal activity as illegal, and blurring the lines between what they wish for and what really is?

 

[Paendragon]

James O'Keefe was arrested, charged and found guilty. His lies still managed to destroy ACORN, the truth be damned.

/Thread.

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

Because the religious right doesn't want insurance companies covering the cost.

If you can't afford a condom, maybe you should think twice before making a baby.

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

No, murder is still illegal.

Nice job of deflecting the conversation away from the point that Planned Parenthood has done nothing wrong, and all the hoopla that flooded the media in the wake of the videos was just bullshit and spin. As in manufactured, made up, not real. You know, lies. And Breitbart, Rush and all the rest whipped it into a frenzy (with the support of our lovely MSM), and it filtered down all through the blog-o-sphere and is now so entrenched that there's no doubt that a great many will never believe the story isn't true.

Does anyone expect any of those blight-wing media guys to print a retraction? Or will they just bluster forward, changing the argument by redefining legal activity as illegal, and blurring the lines between what they wish for and what really is?

Because killing a baby in utero is not currently illegal, doesn't mean it shouldn't be, as it once was.

 

[kismet999]

Because killing a baby in utero is not currently illegal, doesn't mean it shouldn't be, as it once was.

ms ann thrope, you play both ends against the middle. At 22 posts per day, I applaud your balance.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Because the religious right doesn't want insurance companies covering the cost.

$0.64 for a Trojan Bareskin, or $700K for an unwanted child. You'd think the dummies would hand out condoms with the Eucharist or stick them in the bibles they put in every hotel room.

 

[sigh]

Because killing a baby in utero is not currently illegal, doesn't mean it shouldn't be, as it once was.

I guess you decided to go with: changing the argument by redefining legal activity as illegal, and blurring the lines between what they wish for and what really is.

I'm sure you won't be alone.

 

[phrodeau]

If you can't afford a condom, maybe you should think twice before making a baby.

Tell it to Bristol Palin.

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

ms ann thrope, you play both ends against the middle. At 22 posts per day, I applaud your balance.

Do you want a sucker or something?

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

$0.64 for a Trojan Bareskin, or $700K for an unwanted child. You'd think the dummies would hand out condoms with the Eucharist or stick them in the bibles they put in every hotel room.

Liberals have absolutely no concept of personal responsibility.

 

[sybarite_1]

They are called pro-life not "anti-abortion."

We will cut the funding for this PRIVATE group once we get President Trump in there with a Republican Congress. Senator Cruz can take care of this in Congress next year.

If we are going to fund the killing of children, at the least the government itself should run it, or distribute it out to various private groups. This is total crony capitalism in its charity guise. Why is this one PRIVATE group given all this money. At the very least, we need some anti-trust investigations as to how this happened. This group is NOT entitled to people's money "just because." That's another angle that we need to after it on.

Children are not being killed.
That's like saying an acorn is a tree.
Fine.
Here's 12 acorns.
I just filled your lumber order to build a house.
Pay me for the lumber from 12 trees.
What???
Acorns aren't trees???
Then fetuses aren't children.

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

I guess you decided to go with: changing the argument by redefining legal activity as illegal, and blurring the lines between what they wish for and what really is.

I'm sure you won't be alone.

Just because something is legal doesn't mean it is moral. Take eminent domain for instance.

 

[sybarite_1]

Tell it to Bristol Palin.

Ha Ha HAHAAAA

Quote of the month...

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

Tell it to Bristol Palin.

She should clean up her own house. I assume her problems have more to do with having a silver spoon up her ass than anything else.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Why would you think the solution to the problem is for the responsible reproducers (or non-reproducers) to pick up the slack for the non-responsible ones?

Because that's how society works.

What about a little personal responsibility up front?

LOL if you think that will ever happen in any society anywhere you're dumber than I thought.

I can get birth control at Walgreens. Why inflate the price through government bureaucracy 10 fold?

Because it's cheaper at PP.

Because killing a baby in utero is not currently illegal, doesn't mean it shouldn't be, as it once was.

Just because you think it should be doesn't mean it is.

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

Because that's how society works.



LOL if you think that will ever happen in any society anywhere you're dumber than I thought.



Because it's cheaper at PP.



Just because you think it should be doesn't mean it is.

Then maybe we should just leave it up to Darwin?

 

[BoyNextDoor]

I guess there is a difference between people that have their morality spoon fed to them from the written version of the oral histories of desert nomads from 5,000 years ago vs. those that can have morality based upon the human condition in 2016.

A big difference. Huge.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Just keep digging mann maybe you'll make it out the other side some day.

http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/mutcuf-and-maua/images/1/15/Digging-hole-p-com-92054054.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20150704183924

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

I guess there is a difference between people that have their morality spoon fed to them from the written version of the oral histories of desert nomads from 5,000 years ago vs. those that can have morality based upon the human condition in 2016.

A big difference. Huge.

The Human Condition in 2016? Do you really think the problems are all that different? The only real difference is that people have come to depend on government handouts to survive.

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

Just keep digging mann maybe you'll make it out the other side some day.

][/QUOTE] Are all these boards you sit on elected positions?

 

[sybarite_1]

Just because something is legal doesn't mean it is moral. Take eminent domain for instance.

Whooaaaa

Morality changes with each religion

It is not a fixed variable

Is it moral to prevent girls from being educated? How about killing the teachers of those girls? How about Jihads? How about the Catholic Church absolving murderers and not reporting them to the police so they can be prosecuted and do jail time or be. ... Uh oh...here it is...executed.