Obama wants BackgroundChecks for lawabidingcitizens purchasing guns but not 4 terrori

[Oh_That_Guy]

You dont. Racist thug?


Simple, he isnt doing background checks on Muslims, it was all over the news after SB, for privacy reasons......

As a racist thug, you wont answer

I'll play along. What am I not answering?

 

[miles]

Where exactly is his EO changing laws passed by Congress?

Point it out specifically or you're just making up bullshit.

Oh, now I get it.

So typical - "if I know nothing about the subject, then it doesn't exist."

You're a lazy, willfully ignorant, uninformed asshole.

Fucking idiot.

 

[Oh_That_Guy]

Oh, now I get it.

So typical - "if I know nothing about the subject, then it doesn't exist."

You're a lazy, willfully ignorant, uninformed asshole.

Fucking idiot.

I don't think you of all people get to call anyone willfully ignorant. I've seen your posts, they are chock full of willful ignorance.

 

[miles]

Yes he does. He's the fucking president. Deal with it. Or you know, impeach him.

Jesus Fucking Christ. The president can unilaterally change laws, huh? Did you finish grade school?

 

[BotanyBoy]

2nd Amendment. We just had this argument literally for like three days. And you said he couldn't do this and would be destroyed if he did.

His EO does not violate 2A.

I said he couldn't outright ban guns in violation of 2A with an EO and get away with it. Our discussion was theory crafting how a hypothetical situation would play out.

For example if EO said "No more guns for anyone. National Guard will be buy shortly to search/seize all weapons." he would get fucked in the ass so fast the order would never leave the WH.

Oh, now I get it.

So typical - "if I know nothing about the subject, then it doesn't exist."

You're a lazy, willfully ignorant, uninformed asshole.

Fucking idiot.

So you can't point out where EO actually violates the constitution or the laws passed by congress despite the accusations of such an EO being issued.

I'm shocked

 

[Sean Renaud]

Jesus Fucking Christ. The president can unilaterally change laws, huh? Did you finish grade school?

Did you? The limitations of the Executive Order are at best theoritcal. There are no defined limits to what can and cannot be done. In practice they are generally used to tweak laws to get them to work or to expedite things but they have been used to imprison an entire ethnicity before.

 

[miles]

His EO does not violate 2A.

I said he couldn't outright ban guns in violation of 2A with an EO and get away with it. Our discussion was theory crafting how a hypothetical situation would play out.

For example if EO said "No more guns for anyone. National Guard will be buy shortly to search/seize all weapons." he would get fucked in the ass so fast the order would never leave the WH.



So you can't point out where EO actually violates the constitution or the laws passed by congress despite the accusations of such an EO being issued.

I'm shocked

I never said he was banning the sale of in individual guns, did I? You made that up. You lied. So typical - create a straw man argument, argue against it, then declare victory.

What kind of idiot are you?

Anyone with a shred of intelligence could Google this subject and determine the facts, but you won't do that, will you? Every time you whine and say "show me" is a tacit admission that you're either too lazy or stupid to educate yourself. I'm guessing it's a combination of both.

 

[miles]

Did you? The limitations of the Executive Order are at best theoritcal. There are no defined limits to what can and cannot be done. In practice they are generally used to tweak laws to get them to work or to expedite things but they have been used to imprison an entire ethnicity before.

Dude: use your finger to follow the words on the screen and speak each one of them out loud. I'll even enlarge the text to make it easier to read.

Congress exempted gun shows from conducting background checks. Today's EO tries to override that.

Was that so hard?

 

[BotanyBoy]

I never said he was banning the sale of in individual guns, did I?

I never said you did.

You made that up. You lied. So typical - create a straw man argument, argue against it, then declare victory.

LOL I never made an argument or declared victory I asked you to back up your claim and point out exactly where the EO violates the laws of congress. You seem to be having trouble doing that...

Shocking!

What kind of idiot are you?

Anyone with a shred of intelligence could Google this subject and determine the facts, but you won't do that, will you? Every time you whine and say "show me" is a tacit admission that you're either too lazy or stupid to educate yourself. I'm guessing it's a combination of both.

I just now read the entire EO....nothing in there violates the laws of congress or the US Constitution. You're a liar liar....and your pants are on fuckin' fire bro!

 

[BotanyBoy]

Congress exempted gun shows from conducting background checks. Today's EO tries to override that.

Where?

Where is the EO violating Congress's exemption?

Reach for the stars and function at a 5th grade level for 10 seconds and cite it.

 

[putzpotus]

I don't think you of all people get to call anyone willfully ignorant. I've seen your posts, they are chock full of willful ignorance.

Listen up, Racist thug, the question is obvious, posted twice

You are a CuntClinton voter, and thus may not understand it

 

[miles]

I made a huge mistake. I engaged people in a discussion who are incapable of typing keywords into Google to gather information.

Hopefully you people never reproduced.

 

[Oh_That_Guy]

Listen up, Racist thug, the question is obvious, posted twice

You are a CuntClinton voter, and thus may not understand it

Nope. I looked back and nowhere did you quote me and ask a question. You claimed you did a couple times but I don't see any questions from you. Never mind that I asked in my first post and going by your playground logic you should have to answer that first.
But please, ask away. I will gladly answer and expect the same from you.

 

[BotanyBoy]

I made a huge mistake. I engaged people in a discussion who are incapable of typing keywords into Google to gather information.

Hopefully you people never reproduced.

Google says you're full of shit.

Miles complete failure to back up his bullshit and lies....par for the course.

 

[miles]

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_bvM-T4AUUWs/TPqTGTwcIlI/AAAAAAAAABc/XJBqbrLIF4o/s1600/Pot+makes+you+stupid.jpeg

 

[BotanyBoy]

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_bvM-T4AUUWs/TPqTGTwcIlI/AAAAAAAAABc/XJBqbrLIF4o/s1600/Pot+makes+you+stupid.jpeg

That might be true.

But you're a liar....and you can't back up the bullshit your pushing in this thread among many many others.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Dude: use your finger to follow the words on the screen and speak each one of them out loud. I'll even enlarge the text to make it easier to read.

Congress exempted gun shows from conducting background checks. Today's EO tries to override that.

Was that so hard?

And Obama said "fuck that bullshit." As is within his powers.

 

[putzpotus]

Nope. I looked back and nowhere did you quote me and ask a question. You claimed you did a couple times but I don't see any questions from you. Never mind that I asked in my first post and going by your playground logic you should have to answer that first.
But please, ask away. I will gladly answer and expect the same from you.

Whatevet, CuntClinton wannabe

 

[M. Jordan]

So the president can arbitrarily change laws passed by Congress?

They have always been subject to judicial review so, since they are not written stone they are not unconstitutional and can be changed.

 

[miles]

They have always been subject to judicial review so, since they are not written stone they are not unconstitutional and can be changed.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Sorry, was INTENDEDfor another


And being Muslim does mean EXTRA SCRUTINY

Then being a Jew should require even more scrutiny considering that radical Jewish terrorists have been responsible for more terrorist attacks against the United States than radical Muslims over the last 40 years.

 

[putzpotus]

Whatever

 

[miles]

Then being a Jew should require even more scrutiny considering that radical Jewish terrorists have been responsible for more terrorist attacks against the United States than radical Muslims over the last 40 years.

Did Botany Boy give you some weed?

How many innocent people have "Jewish terrorists" murdered compared with Muslim terrorists?

 

[NeverEndingMe]

racist retard. are you bff with Izzy?

Then being a Jew should require even more scrutiny considering that radical Jewish terrorists have been responsible for more terrorist attacks against the United States than radical Muslims over the last 40 years.

 

[miles]

If The Traitor is so concerned about public safety why did he release 60,000 illegal immigrants who were criminals?

Why didn't the Democrats change the gun laws when they had control of Congress?

Most importantly why do you people continue defending everything The Traitor does?