Obama wants BackgroundChecks for lawabidingcitizens purchasing guns but not 4 terrori

[putzpotus]

Obama wants BackgroundChecks for lawabidingcitizens purchasing guns but not 4 terrorists,

 

[NeverEndingMe]

obama is a cuckold retard

 

[Oh_That_Guy]

How do you know they are law abiding citizens if you don't do a background check?

 

[putzpotus]

Then I axe why isnt he doing same vis a vis terrorists

Tell me, racist

 

[rocketeer50]

Who are the terrorists who are not being background checked? How do YOU define the term and identify them?

I think we should catch and execute the terrorists. But I might disagree with your definitions of who they are. (Hint: just being a muslim is not sufficient.)

 

[putzpotus]

Who are the terrorists who are not being background checked? How do YOU define the term and identify them?

I think we should catch and execute the terrorists. But I might disagree with your definitions of who they are. (Hint: just being a muslim is not sufficient.)

Clown

 

[putzpotus]

How do you know they are law abiding citizens if you don't do a background check?

I axed you a question, racist, where is the answer

 

[Oh_That_Guy]

I axed you a question, racist, where is the answer

I have no idea what you're talking about. I asked you a question that you won't answer and it's a fair question to anyone who is against background checks. How do you know they are law abiding if you don't check?

 

[ryan8558]

I have no idea what you're talking about. I asked you a question that you won't answer and it's a fair question to anyone who is against background checks. How do you know they are law abiding if you don't check?

Please stop trying to bring logic into one of his threads!!!

 

[NeverEndingMe]

How do you know they are law abiding citizens if you don't do a background check?

I agree, how do we know that obama is a law abiding citizen? Hell, do we even know if obama is a Real American?

 

[rocketeer50]

Clown

What is your point of posting if you won't engage? Are you just seeing how many people will read or respond to a provocative post? You must get very rapidly diminishing returns.

 

[M. Jordan]

What is your point of posting if you won't engage? Are you just seeing how many people will read or respond to a provocative post? You must get very rapidly diminishing returns.

Most of his posts go unanswered as do those of never ending me. A social misfit and a low IQ porn author. Could be one and same couldn't it?

 

[putzpotus]

I have no idea what you're talking about. I asked you a question that you won't answer and it's a fair question to anyone who is against background checks. How do you know they are law abiding if you don't check?

You dont. Racist thug?


Simple, he isnt doing background checks on Muslims, it was all over the news after SB, for privacy reasons......

As a racist thug, you wont answer

 

[putzpotus]

What is your point of posting if you won't engage? Are you just seeing how many people will read or respond to a provocative post? You must get very rapidly diminishing returns.

Sorry, was INTENDEDfor another


And being Muslim does mean EXTRA SCRUTINY

 

[miles]

I have to wonder how many people who would otherwise stay home on Election Day
may turn out and vote Republican because of Obama's latest gun control scheme.

Ditto for Democrat gun owners.

Regardless of her liberal stance on gun control The Beast couldn't be very
happy right now.

 

[Sean Renaud]

I disagree. This is one of those times where he made a move and Republicans really can't complain. The only sensible move is to jump on board.

 

[miles]

I disagree. This is one of those times where he made a move and Republicans really can't complain. The only sensible move is to jump on board.

WTF are you talking about? Jump on board on an unconstitutional executive order?

 

[BotanyBoy]

WTF are you talking about? Jump on board on an unconstitutional executive order?

What is unconstitutional about it?

 

[miles]

What is unconstitutional about it?

Congress specifically exempted private sellers from conducting background checks on individual buyers. The president does not have the authority to change the law.

Period.

 

[M. Jordan]

It's not unconstitutional and I applaud him for having the guts to do what congress won't.

 

[miles]

It's not unconstitutional and I applaud him for having the guts to do what congress won't.

So the president can arbitrarily change laws passed by Congress?

 

[Oh_That_Guy]

It's always fun to watch everyone argue over what is constitutional. Obviously both can't be right but both swear up and down they are and the other is a moron. I got no problem saying I have no idea if it is or not. Don't know why others can't say the same.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Congress specifically exempted private sellers from conducting background checks on individual buyers. The president does not have the authority to change the law.

Period.

He's not banning private sales and I didn't ask you what congress did/said I asked you what about O's EO is unconstitutional.

So point out exactly what about it violates the Constitution or you're full of shit.

 

[BotanyBoy]

So the president can arbitrarily change laws passed by Congress?

Where exactly is his EO changing laws passed by Congress?

Point it out specifically or you're just making up bullshit.

 

[Sean Renaud]

WTF are you talking about? Jump on board on an unconstitutional executive order?

Yes. That is the only winning move here miles. To say you support background checks and increased mental health. You can at least bitch about the other provisions and rightly so. But your winning move is to jump on board.

What is unconstitutional about it?

2nd Amendment. We just had this argument literally for like three days. And you said he couldn't do this and would be destroyed if he did.

Congress specifically exempted private sellers from conducting background checks on individual buyers. The president does not have the authority to change the law.

Period.

Yes he does. He's the fucking president. Deal with it. Or you know, impeach him.