That Affluenza Kid and His Mother

[Pookie]

Whatever...

Well, if we ignore that "partisan" isn't just about a candidate or party, you've done a terrific job of shilling already.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Well, if we ignore that "partisan" isn't just about a candidate or party, you've done a terrific job of shilling already.

In what way?

I have made general observations and advocated no real position.

I began wondering about the lynch mob mentality and from the one inquired about the many and our national attitudes towards their bad behavior. I guess the shilling part is actually thinking that some are behaving badly and that there is a segment of our nation that actually advocates for an understanding of their anger and behavior. I suppose I should just take up a rock and get in line to stone the kid to prove I'm not a "shill."

 

[Saint Peter]

Whatever...

Don't go away mad...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Please, don't add anything substantive to the ongoing conversation.



It might ruin your perfect record.

 

[Saint Peter]

You do not have conversations.

You have tantrums.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

You've dome nothing but hurl accusations.


If anyone sounds angry, it's you.

 

[Pookie]

In what way?

I have made general observations and advocated no real position.

I began wondering about the lynch mob mentality and from the one inquired about the many and our national attitudes towards their bad behavior. I guess the shilling part is actually thinking that some are behaving badly and that there is a segment of our nation that actually advocates for an understanding of their anger and behavior. I suppose I should just take up a rock and get in line to stone the kid to prove I'm not a "shill."

See! All you had to do was look in the mirror. Partisan isn't just about being for a party or a person,. It can be about a cause. And you've mastered the backhanded approach to it.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

See! All you had to do was look in the mirror. Partisan isn't just about being for a party or a person, but it can be about a cause. And you've mastered the backhanded approach to it.

What cause am I advocating for?

 

[Saint Peter]

I rarely get angry. You have never seen it.

 

[Pookie]

What cause am I advocating for?

I said backhanded - as in what cause are you advocating against.

Mr. Not-Republican

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I said backhanded - as in what cause are you advocating against.

Mr. Not-Republican

It seems that you and Pete are on a witch-hunt which is probably driven by partisan goals since you seem to be more interesting in discussing me more than any actual statement that I have posted and the only thing that I have been openly wondering about is the total hostility directed towards an assailable victim that when directed at an unassailable victim becomes some sort of '-ism."

 

[Saint Peter]

It seems that you and Pete are on a witch-hunt which is probably driven by partisan goals since you seem to be more interesting in discussing me more than any actual statement that I have posted and the only thing that I have been openly wondering about is the total hostility directed towards an assailable victim that when directed at an unassailable victim becomes some sort of '-ism."

Pete is not on a witch hunt you fucking crybaby.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Just another hurled charge.



That's about the entirety of your bag of tricks; the schoolboy taunts of Peter Pan...

 

[Sean]

It seems that you and Pete are on a witch-hunt which is probably driven by partisan goals since you seem to be more interesting in discussing me more than any actual statement that I have posted and the only thing that I have been openly wondering about is the total hostility directed towards an assailable victim that when directed at an unassailable victim becomes some sort of '-ism."

You really are a whiny bitch when you get a dose of your own medicine.

 

[Saint Peter]

This is what does not add up. I have never met a Marine that was such a big pussy. It makes the whole story very unbelievable.

 

[Pookie]

It seems that you and Pete are on a witch-hunt which is probably driven by partisan goals since you seem to be more interesting in discussing me more than any actual statement that I have posted and the only thing that I have been openly wondering about is the total hostility directed towards an assailable victim that when directed at an unassailable victim becomes some sort of '-ism."

Nope, just pointing out hypocrisy. You're taking partisan shots in this thread. Your actual statement about "social justice" is just that - a partisan shot made in a backhanded way. Your very next post is clearly partisan in a direct way.

You want to play the game without being called a player. You've been doing it for years. It doesn't work like that though. People see it for what it is, regardless of how you complain.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

More schoolyard taunts...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Nope, just pointing out hypocrisy. You're taking partisan shots in this thread. Your actual statement about "social justice" is just that - a partisan shot made in a backhanded way. Your very next post is clearly partisan in a direct way.

You want to play the game without being called a player. You've been doing it for years. It doesn't work like that though. People see it for what it is, regardless of how you complain.

Now who is most likely to see the term "Social Justice" as a political dog-whistle if not true partisan?

I note that you are not quoting anything or rebutting anything, like Petey,

You're just implying "Republican."

It's all black and white...

 

[Pookie]

More schoolyard taunts...

You get so victimy when called out on your hypocrisy.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

You get so victimy when called out on your hypocrisy.

Another post, another taunt.

We call you names, and then if you respond, we call you even more names.

It is how we have become to view discourse in a politically-correct environment...



But still, you have to address the actual topic.

 

[Pookie]

Now who is most likely to see the term "Social Justice" as a political dog-whistle if not true partisan?

I note that you are not quoting anything or rebutting anything, like Petey,

You're just implying "Republican."

It's all black and white...

Your reputation precedes you. And I also mentioned a specific post right after that in which you were partisan in to show your hypocrisy for calling out Petey.

You want to play, but not be called a player. People see it for what it is though, no matter how much you howl about it.

 

[Pookie]

Another post, another taunt.

We call you names, and then if you respond, we call you even more names.

It is how we have become to view discourse in a politically-correct environment...



But still, you have to address the actual topic.

I wasn't addressing the topic. I had no intent to. My purpose was to point out your hypocrisy. If you don't like it, put me on iggy.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

So, thee you have it in a nutshell...


Democrats go after people, not topics or issues. Nice and succinct confession.

 

[Pookie]

So, thee you have it in a nutshell...


Democrats go after people, not topics or issues. Nice and succinct confession.

If you want to be partisan in a backhanded way, go with your nutshell.

Mr. Not-Republican

 

[Disgustipated]

Whatever...

Mr. Not Republican adding much needed brainyness to a thread.

I'm not sure where he gets the whole calling everyone else angry when they call him out for his obvious hypocrisy.

All of his over a quarter million posts are nothing but solid reason, rainbows and unicorn farts.