The American jihadist: Ish, AJ and BB

[Sean]

So you concede the point that a majority of Muslims in the Middle East:

- support sharia law
- are homophobic

Do I need to post arguments proving misogyny?

Or do you concede that as well?

I don't concede either of those things. Do you have problems reading?

 

[JohnnySavage]

I'm a warm, loving, generous person. Just ask anybody.

 

[putzpotus]

the guy that runs my corner store is muslim and donates generously every month to local charities

you want him dead because of this

What part of the word

All

Are you not understanding

 

[putzpotus]

I'm a warm, loving, generous person. Just ask anybody.

I do t know Anybody,

So I can't axe Anybody

Besides, why would I take Anybody's word

 

[badbabysitter]

Jews don't commit extreme acts and are a threat to no one

liar

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/jerusa...-jewish-extremist-stabs-6-at-parade-1.3174137

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4738049,00.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irgun

there's quite a list actually


so do you support killing all jews now?

 

[badbabysitter]

What part of the word

All

Are you not understanding

as long as you concede all jews must die due to the acts of terrorism some other jews have commited

 

[putzpotus]

liar

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/jerusa...-jewish-extremist-stabs-6-at-parade-1.3174137

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4738049,00.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irgun

there's quite a list actually


so do you support killing all jews now?

criminal

Isolated

 

[badbabysitter]

criminal

Isolated

oh right... a guy killing his coworkers is terrorism

a group dedicated to murdering Arabs..isolated


rwcj logic at work

 

[VaticanAssassin]

I don't concede either of those things. Do you have problems reading?

Then I stand by my statement it is 100% certain you are a fucking retard.

Since you can not effectively argue against those statements would you like to continue to dodge by talking about Christian countries in Africa?

 

[VaticanAssassin]

Jews don't commit extreme acts and are a threat to no one

Hey LJ...

Why are you even talking to it?

 

[badbabysitter]

Then I stand by my statement it is 100% certain you are a fucking retard.

Since you can not effectively argue against those statements would you like to continue to dodge by talking about Christian countries in Africa?

i must be iggied, because you can't completely live in denial that you posted something that actively disproves your thesis

 

[badbabysitter]

Hey LJ...

Why are you even talking to it?

probably because he realizes talking to you would insult his last shreds of intelligence

 

[Colonel Hogan]

A majority of Hogans argument here relies on assumptions of thoughts of the average Muslim in the USA.

He is probably correct.

WOW!!! A BREAK THROUGH!!

But if he wants to apply those assumptions to the average Muslim in the Middle East, he is completely, 100%, dead ass wrong.

I suspect he knows that.

Then again, maybe not.

Would it shock you to learn based on everything I've posted throughout this forum that my major concern about American illegal discrimination with regard to an ALL OUT WAR AGAINST ALL of ISLAM is NOT directed to Muslims in the Middle East (moderate or otherwise) where American ignorance does not usually reach in practice (except on YouTube and Al Jeezera), but rather toward moderate Muslims in America, most of whom are actually United States citizens with the full spectrum of civil rights?

Furthermore, I must again remind you that I have never made estimates of what percentage of Muslims are moderate or jihadist -- only that the FACT of WIDELY DIVERGING THEOLOGICAL BELIEFS are not only possible but INDISPUTABLY DOCUMENTED WITHIN ISLAM. You and your posse are the ones who love to play fast and loose with numbers.

I'm simply telling you that with respect to the LAW and with the REASONABLE PROBABILITY of what American Muslims most likely believe (which you NOW finally acknowledge) your stupid exaggerations remain counterproductive, unnecessary and, in many cases, blatantly illegal.

It is not the extreme Muslim in the Middle East that is mysoginstic, homophobic, anti-Christian, pro religious law..... It is the majority.

Not just the majority. The vast majority.

I suspect he knows that as well.

And your continued flailing at geographical and sectarian distinctions is like trying to reduce a quantity of rat poison to safe consumable levels in a bowl of cereal.

When all you have to do -- all you SHOULD do -- is wage war against the ENEMY. And the enemy will ALWAYS reveal himself eventually. They really are dependable that way.

One need not attend law school to understand, nor does it constitute legalese nitpicking to point out that the concept of self-defense does not confer the right to kill, detain or violate the legal rights of ALL of your neighbors, no matter how much they may hate you either before or after the fact.

 

[VaticanAssassin]

WOW!!! A BREAK THROUGH!!



Then again, maybe not.

Would it shock you to learn based on everything I've posted throughout this forum that my major concern about American illegal discrimination with regard to an ALL OUT WAR AGAINST ALL of ISLAM is NOT directed to Muslims in the Middle East (moderate or otherwise) where American ignorance does not usually reach in practice (except on YouTube and Al Jeezera), but rather toward moderate Muslims in America, most of whom are actually United States citizens with the full spectrum of civil rights?

Furthermore, I must again remind you that I have never made estimates of what percentage of Muslims are moderate or jihadist -- only that the FACT of WIDELY DIVERGING THEOLOGICAL BELIEFS are not only possible but INDISPUTABLY DOCUMENTED WITHIN ISLAM. You and your posse are the ones who love to play fast and loose with numbers.

I'm simply telling you that with respect to the LAW and with the REASONABLE PROBABILITY of what American Muslims most likely believe (which you NOW finally acknowledge) your stupid exaggerations remain counterproductive, unnecessary and, in many cases, blatantly illegal.



And your continued flailing at geographical and sectarian distinctions is like trying to reduce a quantity of rat poison to safe consumable levels in a bowl of cereal.

When all you have to do -- all you SHOULD do -- is wage war against the ENEMY. And the enemy will ALWAYS reveal himself eventually. They really are dependable that way.

One need not attend law school to understand, nor does it constitute legalese nitpicking to point out that the concept of self-defense does not confer the right to kill, detain or violate the legal rights of ALL of your neighbors, no matter how much they may hate you either before or after the fact.

Once again we find ourselves in a position where you agree with my original statement but want to assign me postions out side my beliefs.

Then let me make my position clear in regards to American Muslims who have integrated in to our society and accept our basic values:

I do not want to put them in camps
I do not want to deport them
I applaud their efforts and willingness to abandon the homophobic, misogynystic, beliefs of a majority of their countrymen.

We also both agree we are at "war" with extreme Islam.

I suspect we disagree on this:

A moratorium on immigration for all Muslims from countries that actively or Inactively support terrorism.

Our government has admitted we can neither properly screen or track such people.

This is both legal and the only logical option.

 

[allateup]

I can give you a shitload of Christian African countries where homosexuality is illegal if you like.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

 

[Disgustipated]

Do I need to post arguments proving misogyny?

Gonna dig up a thread of your idiot father's?

 

[VaticanAssassin]

Gonna dig up a thread of your idiot father's?

Yes eyeor. That was why I was going to do. Thanks.

 

[allateup]

Gonna dig up a thread of your idiot father's?

Or yours in which you told another poster how you were going to sexually assault his daughter, and then taunted the father about how his daughter would enjoy your sexual assault?

 

[Smoottg103]

Or yours in which you told another poster how you were going to sexually assault his daughter, and then taunted the father about how his daughter would enjoy your sexual assault?

imma jackin it off to the think of dat

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Or yours in which you told another poster how you were going to sexually assault his daughter, and then taunted the father about how his daughter would enjoy your sexual assault?

Ah, just like that lucid fantasy you gleefully and merrily concocted about Pookie's younger sister (but we won't mention how young, will we *wink wink*) and felt so ashamed about afterwards (well, after you got called out on your unraveling seams hypocrisy) that you started scrubbing your words faster than Dow Bathroom Cleaning Bubbles on moldy shower tiles!

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3_Bz4pYBPHg/hqdefault.jpg

~ a-scrubba-scrubba-scrubba-scrubba! ~

 

[Colonel Hogan]

Once again we find ourselves in a position where you agree with my original statement but want to assign me postions out side my beliefs.

Then let me make my position clear in regards to American Muslims who have integrated in to our society and accept our basic values:

I do not want to put them in camps
I do not want to deport them
I applaud their efforts and willingness to abandon the homophobic, misogynystic, beliefs of a majority of their countrymen.

We also both agree we are at "war" with extreme Islam.

I suspect we disagree on this:

A moratorium on immigration for all Muslims from countries that actively or Inactively support terrorism.

Our government has admitted we can neither properly screen or track such people.

This is both legal and the only logical option.

I find it difficult to believe that the boldfaced sentence accurately portrays the context of what our government "admitted." Please place a temporary moratorium on your policy of not documenting your assertions by providing the full source of this "admission."

I am far more likely to believe that the government admitted that a reasonable and proper vetting of visa applicants from ANY country cannot guarantee that a militant jihadist bent on committing crimes of violence once inside this country won't be successful in completing the legal application process.

A jihadist determined to commit such a crime is probably not likely to immigrate from the countries you fear anyway. If it were me, I'd apply under a German, French or some other Western European passport -- not even come in as a refugee.

The only way to prevent what you fear is a religious test applied to ALL immigration applications regardless of originating country. And that isn't going to happen. Furthermore, even if it did, then we get back to that "permission to lie" business which a jihadist warrior is certainly going to invoke, right?

So the only way to protect America from enemy infiltration via immigration is to place a religious/loyalty test on every single visa applicant regardless of religion or country of origin AND subject each applicant to a polygraph.

That at least should give you job security, if not the other kind.

 

[VaticanAssassin]

I find it difficult to believe that the boldfaced sentence accurately portrays the context of what our government "admitted." Please place a temporary moratorium on your policy of not documenting your assertions by providing the full source of this "admission."

I am far more likely to believe that the government admitted that a reasonable and proper vetting of visa applicants from ANY country cannot guarantee that a militant jihadist bent on committing crimes of violence once inside this country won't be successful in completing the legal application process.

A jihadist determined to commit such a crime is probably not likely to immigrate from the countries you fear anyway. If it were me, I'd apply under a German, French or some other Western European passport -- not even come in as a refugee.

The only way to prevent what you fear is a religious test applied to ALL immigration applications regardless of originating country. And that isn't going to happen. Furthermore, even if it did, then we get back to that "permission to lie" business which a jihadist warrior is certainly going to invoke, right?

So the only way to protect America from enemy infiltration via immigration is to place a religious/loyalty test on every single visa applicant regardless of religion or country of origin AND subject each applicant to a polygraph.

That at least should give you job security, if not the other kind.

A religious test is not needed. A country list is sufficient. It is also legal and has historic precedence.

A take back the admited part. But that is just you arguing words. The fact that they can't remains true. As far as them using another country. Sure they could. But it would add another level of security. Just because something can not be done 100% does not mean it shouldn't be done.

 

[putzpotus]

I find it difficult to believe that the boldfaced sentence accurately portrays the context of what our government "admitted." Please place a temporary moratorium on your policy of not documenting your assertions by providing the full source of this "admission."

I am far more likely to believe that the government admitted that a reasonable and proper vetting of visa applicants from ANY country cannot guarantee that a militant jihadist bent on committing crimes of violence once inside this country won't be successful in completing the legal application process.

A jihadist determined to commit such a crime is probably not likely to immigrate from the countries you fear anyway. If it were me, I'd apply under a German, French or some other Western European passport -- not even come in as a refugee.

The only way to prevent what you fear is a religious test applied to ALL immigration applications regardless of originating country. And that isn't going to happen. Furthermore, even if it did, then we get back to that "permission to lie" business which a jihadist warrior is certainly going to invoke, right?

So the only way to protect America from enemy infiltration via immigration is to place a religious/loyalty test on every single visa applicant regardless of religion or country of origin AND subject each applicant to a polygraph.

That at least should give you job security, if not the other kind.

ObamaCo didnt

FBI did

and

DHS shows it by NOT vetting

You are full of shit

enough with these LONG WRITING USELESS SHIT ALREADY

 

[putzpotus]

Obama Officials Are Trained To Concentrate On Behavior, Not Religion Or Ideology Of People Entering U.S.

malik1

Retraining courtesy of CAIR. Clue, if they have the behavior of posting about wanting to commit jihad, that’s a clue…

Via Daily Caller:


STFU about any IMMIGRATION

 

[putzpotus]

STFU about any IMMIGRATION

Obama Officials Are Trained To Concentrate On Behavior, Not Religion Or Ideology Of People Entering U.S.

malik1

Retraining courtesy of CAIR. Clue, if they have the behavior of posting about wanting to commit jihad, that’s a clue…

Via Daily Caller: