Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Motive unknown
…
It might be asinine, but a few mass shootings have been caused by such apparently trivial motives.
As yet, we don't know why.
They booby trapped their house in case some of their co-workers followed them home.....
It is clearly work place violence.
Old Today, 12:30 PM
Remove user from ignore list
putzpotus
This message is hidden because putzpotus is on your ignore list.
View Post
Old Today, 12:31 PM
Remove user from ignore list
putzpotus
This message is hidden because putzpotus is on your ignore list.
View Post
Old Today, 12:35 PM
Remove user from ignore list
putzpotus
This message is hidden because putzpotus is on your ignore list.
View Post
Old Today, 12:35 PM
Remove user from ignore list
putzpotus
This message is hidden because putzpotus is on your ignore list.
View Post
Old Today, 12:36 PM
Remove user from ignore list
putzpotus
This message is hidden because putzpotus is on your ignore list.
View Post
Unread Today, 12:37 PM
Remove user from ignore list
putzpotus
This message is hidden because putzpotus is on your ignore list.
View Post
Unread Today, 12:38 PM
Remove user from ignore list
VaticanAssassin
This message is hidden because VaticanAssassin is on your ignore list.
View Post
Unread Today, 12:39 PM
Remove user from ignore list
putzpotus
This message is hidden because putzpotus is on your ignore list.
The couple also had GoPro cameras strapped to their body armor
ALGO agrees with thisIF YOU SEE SOMETHING…Man saw suspicious activity in Calif. but didn’t report it because of profiling concerns:
From CBS Los Angeles:
Neighbors in Redlands were shocked that the suspects had ties to their area.
“I was in awe that it was happening four houses down from my property,” one neighbor said.
A man who has been working in the area said he noticed a half-dozen Middle Eastern men in the area in recent weeks, but decided not to report anything since he did not wish to racially profile those people.
“We sat around lunch thinking, ‘What were they doing around the neighborhood?’” he said. “We’d see them leave where they’re raiding the apartment.”
From last month: If you see something, say something. And get sued for $15 million.
And from Dorothy Rabinowitz of the Wall Street Journal on the tenth anniversary of 9/11:
A note about CNN’s “Footnotes of 9/11,” which takes up the subject of people who are mentioned in the “9/11 Commission Report.” They were part of the history of the day, if peripheral figures, though in one or two instances they emerge as more. One of the more memorable of the eight subjects here is the Dulles Airport ticket agent who checked in two of the hijackers—Middle Eastern men whose look and demeanor immediately raised his suspicions. The agent followed the men, he reports, then stopped himself from alerting anyone. He didn’t want to be accused of prejudice, of harboring suspicions because of racial feelings. A vignette from a footnote—but one that has much to tell about some of the underlying reasons for the ease with which the hijackers were able to board the planes and fulfill their murderous mission.
In her article, Rabinowitz also reviewed a Smithsonian Channel special called “9/11: Day That Changed The World.” But in reality, very little has changed when it comes to the power of PC to stifle doubleplusungood crimethink.
Yep.
We can't seem to get past the fact that facts don't work.
And eyesore, I'll never make excuses for not judging people because of their accents, religion, color of their skin, what is or is not dangling between their legs (even if they're sporting a fine rack), who they love, but I will judge folks on their musically tastes. I'm shallow like that.
Then why did he and the wife not just show up blazing away in the first place. He went there, got in an altercation, left and came back blazing. Prepared ahead of time, hell yes. But probably not for that particular attack. Maybe he was planning a terror attack but I doubt this was his first target. If so it puts it much further into a workplace thing. Shit! No reason you can't kill two birds with one stone.
Maybe he was a Muslim nutter preparing for endtimes and sitting on his weapon stash. Very American thing to do. Then someone pissed him off and away we go!
Assuming by some bizarre stretch of improbability you were right, what possible difference would such an irrelevant distinction make? Is it really your hypothesis that he was an Islamic terrorist preparing for an act of terror but before he could do that he acted out of good old American ill-temper and therefore that somehow makes him LESS of a terrorist?
Anyone who has thousands of rounds of ammunition and dozens of pipe bombs in their apartment has more than the usual chip on their shoulder.
So maybe he changed his terrorist target from one populated by people he didn't know to one populated by people he used to work with. Who gives a shit? The picture is coming into increased focus as to who these murders were and what they had on their minds, and "disgruntled government worker" is a pathetically lame characterization of that mindset.
The only difference I can see between the two, and I'm kind of in wait and see mode, is it makes a difference as to what possible steps can be taken to protect us. If terrorists are targeting X I can avoid (which is admittedly their goal in many cases) or at least be on my guard at those locations. Security can be increased at those locations. The fuck do you do if/when it turns out that someone writes down all the names of facilities on a piece of paper throws it in a against the fan and whatever location lands face up in the circle of dog dookie is the one they attack?
Aside from that it makes no difference I can discern yet.
Speaking of I'm willing to play the idiot here who doesn't get it.
WHAT IN THE ELEVEN HELLS IS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF GOPRO CAMERAS AND TERRORISM?
The only difference I can see between the two, and I'm kind of in wait and see mode, is it makes a difference as to what possible steps can be taken to protect us. If terrorists are targeting X I can avoid (which is admittedly their goal in many cases) or at least be on my guard at those locations. Security can be increased at those locations. The fuck do you do if/when it turns out that someone writes down all the names of facilities on a piece of paper throws it in a against the fan and whatever location lands face up in the circle of dog dookie is the one they attack?
Aside from that it makes no difference I can discern yet.
Speaking of I'm willing to play the idiot here who doesn't get it.
WHAT IN THE ELEVEN HELLS IS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF GOPRO CAMERAS AND TERRORISM?
....and how many other mass shooters have been armed to the teeth?