Aella_
non-english speaker
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2015
- Posts
- 6,604
CONT.
Interview: "Ezra Levant and Noam Chomsky on free speech"
http://www.ezralevant.com/ezra-levant-vs-noam-chomsky-the-complete-interview/
Dismissing campus speech codes and political correctness as “an exaggeration” and “a marginal phenomenon”, Chomsky claims that state and corporate control over speech is a much more prevalent and dangerous phenomenon
Chomsky also points out that there actually is a REAL and much more dangerous political correctness, namely, that which is subtly and not so subtly imposed by the right wing (and by the establishment, not just the right wing). Thus, if anyone DARES to question the assumption that Bush invaded Iraq to bring democracy to Iraq by saying that he might have been motivated by oil interests (heaven forbid) then they are quickly called "conspiracy theorists" and "left wing loons". For Chomsky, that unthinking, reflexive defense of Bush's "noble intentions" in Iraq is in fact the TRUE and more pernicious political correctness.
Interview: "Ezra Levant and Noam Chomsky on free speech"
http://www.ezralevant.com/ezra-levant-vs-noam-chomsky-the-complete-interview/
Dismissing campus speech codes and political correctness as “an exaggeration” and “a marginal phenomenon”, Chomsky claims that state and corporate control over speech is a much more prevalent and dangerous phenomenon
Chomsky also points out that there actually is a REAL and much more dangerous political correctness, namely, that which is subtly and not so subtly imposed by the right wing (and by the establishment, not just the right wing). Thus, if anyone DARES to question the assumption that Bush invaded Iraq to bring democracy to Iraq by saying that he might have been motivated by oil interests (heaven forbid) then they are quickly called "conspiracy theorists" and "left wing loons". For Chomsky, that unthinking, reflexive defense of Bush's "noble intentions" in Iraq is in fact the TRUE and more pernicious political correctness.