Dual citizenship: USA and CSA? Why not?

renard_ruse

Break up Amazon
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Posts
16,094
We have millions of "Americans" running around now with "dual citizenship" with some foreign country. Some people even have citizenship in three or more countries now. What would happen if the US went to war with one of these countries? The idea that you can be equally loyal to a foreign country and to the US is ridiculous, but try raising that as a political issue today? The media would go into complete conniption fits, tar and feather and run out of town anyone who challenged this idiocy.

So, since, we now allow "dual citizenship" with foreign countries, why shouldn't Americans who identify with the country's Confederate heritage and history be allowed to claim dual citizenship in both the US and the CSA? The CSA is not a foreign country but an integral part of the US and its history. Why can't people be allowed to claim citizenship in the CSA if they want? Sounds a lot more harmless than having dual citizenship with some foreign country or countries.
 
As it happens, citizens of the US can hold dual citizenship in another country. No problem there.

However, the Confederate States of America do not allow for dual citizenship, so you're out of luck.

http://csa.systekproof.com/?page_id=111

http://csa.systekproof.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Citizenship-Affirmation-July-20151.pdf

Pluuuuus, there's that little thing about the CSA trying that once, and got their collective ass handed to them in a high hat. So badly, in fact, that they hadda put up with black elected officials for a few years.
 
We have millions of "Americans" running around now with "dual citizenship" with some foreign country. .

Ummm… Can you pls. edit your post before I break your comp. screen and kill you?
I live in a "first world" country too, and I have dual citizenship too.
 
Good Lordy let 'em go. Those poor loser bastards have been sucking off the teat of the blue states forever......Let them go down in a blaze of flag wrapped glory.
 
I've been up north, all they got there is niggers and ugly fuggin white gals. The South has always been like Austria is to Germany or Kenya is to England or Hell is to Ireland.
 
I've been up north, all they got there is niggers and ugly fuggin white gals. The South has always been like Austria is to Germany or Kenya is to England or Hell is to Ireland.

Seeing as how you've never been out of your own house I'm not shocked that makes no sense.

By the way how's your fake daughter? Did her black husband kick your ass and put you in traction causing you to cease posting?
 
We have millions of "Americans" running around now with "dual citizenship" with some foreign country. Some people even have citizenship in three or more countries now. What would happen if the US went to war with one of these countries? The idea that you can be equally loyal to a foreign country and to the US is ridiculous, but try raising that as a political issue today? The media would go into complete conniption fits, tar and feather and run out of town anyone who challenged this idiocy.

So, since, we now allow "dual citizenship" with foreign countries, why shouldn't Americans who identify with the country's Confederate heritage and history be allowed to claim dual citizenship in both the US and the CSA? The CSA is not a foreign country but an integral part of the US and its history. Why can't people be allowed to claim citizenship in the CSA if they want? Sounds a lot more harmless than having dual citizenship with some foreign country or countries.

The USA doesn't "allow" dual citizenship; it just doesn't object to American holding more than one citizenship. There are limitations, however, and an objection will be made if you hold citizenship in a country in a declared war with the US. Then you have to pick your side.

The CSA, of course, doesn't exist except in history. The states that comprised it are now in the USA, and so their citizens are US nationals.
 
The USA doesn't "allow" dual citizenship; it just doesn't object to American holding more than one citizenship. There are limitations, however, and an objection will be made if you hold citizenship in a country in a declared war with the US. Then you have to pick your side.
You also lose your US citizenship if you swear an oath of allegiance to another country.
 
Seeing as how you've never been out of your own house I'm not shocked that makes no sense.

By the way how's your fake daughter? Did her black husband kick your ass and put you in traction causing you to cease posting?

I visited your ma plenty of times. Wait! She visited me plenty of times is what happened. I may be your pa.
 
I visited your ma plenty of times. Wait! She visited me plenty of times is what happened. I may be your pa.

Unfortunately, for you my mom isn't a thousand years old.

Also, didn't you cyber fuck vette and busy body and brag about that too?
 
". . . because of it's flag represents . . ."

Is this redneck English?

The obvious answer to the OP is that the CSA isn't a sovereign state. It has no citizenship granting rights.
 
". . . because of it's flag represents . . ."

Is this redneck English?

The obvious answer to the OP is that the CSA isn't a sovereign state. It has no citizenship granting rights.

And by being non existent there would be no advantage to having CSA citizenship.
 
Good Lordy let 'em go. Those poor loser bastards have been sucking off the teat of the blue states forever......Let them go down in a blaze of flag wrapped glory.

Pretty much....we should have let the south go.
 
So, since, we now allow "dual citizenship" with foreign countries, why shouldn't Americans who identify with the country's Confederate heritage and history be allowed to claim dual citizenship in both the US and the CSA?

Because there is no CSA.
 
That probably wouldn't have ended well for anybody.

Not for them, but the rest of the union would have been better off imo. Maybe back then it would have caused a bigger issue...but today it certainly wouldn't. My heart would go out to all non white christian males the south over, but it would be better for the rest of us to let the loons just self destruct without dragging the rest of us down with them.
 
Last edited:
Not for them, but the rest of the union would have been better off imo. Maybe back then it would have caused a bigger issue...but today it certainly wouldn't. My heart would go out to all non white christian males the south over, but it would be better for the rest of us to let the loons just self destruct without dragging the rest of us down with them.

Today we'd be just fine without any real risks to speak of for a number of reasons. First real countries don't invade other countries anymore. That's old school and third world bullshit and even the third world for the most part doesn't. I guess you can kinda count Russia attempting to put itself back together again but those are largely less invasions and more annexations with tanks. When the invadees are literally bringing food and water to the invaders. . .well lets say I'm uncertain if invasion and conquer are appropriate words. Which isn't me defending Putin or Russia just saying that's not quite the same.

In 1860 a broken South without the money of the north would have been easy pickings for Mexico if nobody else. Who knows what the division in the end would have been since that would require knowing lots of things that didn't happen.

As for today. . .yeah getting rid of those bitches would be great. IT would take a bit of adjusting to get around but in the long run it would work fairly well. Though lets be fair, I'm fairly moderate when it comes to gun rights. Without those loons in the south to keep the uber libs in check that shit might not fly homes.
 
Not for them, but the rest of the union would have been better off imo. Maybe back then it would have caused a bigger issue...but today it certainly wouldn't. My heart would go out to all non white christian males the south over, but it would be better for the rest of us to let the loons just self destruct without dragging the rest of us down with them.

But the North needed the Mississippi River, Southern markets, and Southern taxes.
 
Back
Top