Why are Lit feminists so SCARED of threads about women MRAs? Hmmm?

[LJ_Reloaded]

Is this woman all that frightening to feminists around the world? Probably. Considering this.

Of course we know why nobody responds to stuff like this - nobody can call a WOMAN a fucking woman hating potential rapist.

 

[adult12377]

feminist = retard.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Nobody is afraid of MRAs.
Mostly they're looked at as a fucking ridiculous joke.

Poor, poor oppressed men...

 

[Liar]

What threads about women MRAs?

 

[lovecraft68]

feminist = retard.

Retard=adult12377

But LJ will be happy that another misogynistic turd has shown up in the lit cat box.

 

[pollynova]

It's important that men receive equal treatment when it comes to things like custody cases. But all these so-called "Men's rights" groups have been taken over by losers who can't get laid and somehow that's a woman's fault.

 

[lovecraft68]

It's important that men receive equal treatment when it comes to things like custody cases. But all these so-called "Men's rights" groups have been taken over by losers who can't get laid and somehow that's a woman's fault.

Pretty much. MRA's are like a lot of things, they started out with a decent cause and intent then just devolve into extremist bullshit therefore taking away any chance of doing any good for what they allegedly believe in.

What most believe in is a clubhouse full of like minded losers who get off on running women down and lamenting we are no longer living in the 'bare foot and pregnant and women need a good rap in the mouth days"

Oh, and they are the least likely to ever try to give anyone that can hit back, that 'rap in the mouth' hence the need to stick together and stroke each other's egos...and cocks.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Pretty much. MRA's are like a lot of things, they started out with a decent cause and intent then just devolve into extremist bullshit therefore taking away any chance of doing any good for what they allegedly believe in.

What most believe in is a clubhouse full of like minded losers who get off on running women down and lamenting we are no longer living in the 'bare foot and pregnant and women need a good rap in the mouth days"

Oh, and they are the least likely to ever try to give anyone that can hit back, that 'rap in the mouth' hence the need to stick together and stroke each other's egos...and cocks.

And this is why you're so scared of talking about women MRAs.

None of this retarded feminist propaganda is even relevant to them.

Watch how you run away from me now or try to completely avoid talking about women MRAs at all. I've got your number, dude.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

It's important that men receive equal treatment when it comes to things like custody cases. But all these so-called "Men's rights" groups have been taken over by losers who can't get laid and somehow that's a woman's fault.

Notice how you frightened feminists always redirect the discussion toward MEN who oppose your movement?

You people were knocked completely rudderless when Women Against Feminism became a thing.
http://cdn0.dailydot.com/uploaded/images/original/2014/8/2/waf2.jpg
You fear this. That's why you're obsessed with going after men. Because women against feminism is a weakness you cannot adapt to.

 

[hashtag45]

lol, LJ,
I thought the HoneyBadger website was yours but now your avatar makes more sense to me.

Don't get me wrong, other users, I'm on my sisters' + moderate feminists' side especially when it comes to some misogynist a-hles on this site.
However, having been bullied by 2 bitches several years ago and having seen the other side of the coin (that the v.few Radical Feminists that I encountered tend to turn on their kind despite what they preach),
- I'm on LJ's side with this one

 

[pollynova]

Notice how you frightened feminists always redirect the discussion toward MEN who oppose your movement?

You people were knocked completely rudderless when Women Against Feminism became a thing.
http://cdn0.dailydot.com/uploaded/images/original/2014/8/2/waf2.jpg
You fear this. That's why you're obsessed with going after men. Because women against feminism is a weakness you cannot adapt to.

I am not a "feminist" at all. And I don't "go after" men.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

lol, LJ,
I thought the HoneyBadger website was yours but now your avatar makes more sense to me.

It's not my site, but I'm an anonymous fan. I'm generally not big on leaders of any sort, they cause cults of personality. But Karen Straughan isn't trying to be a big time leader, she's just speaking her piece, and getting known for doing so.

Don't get me wrong, other users, I'm on my sisters' + moderate feminists' side especially when it comes to some misogynist a-hles on this site.
However, having been bullied by 2 bitches several years ago and having seen the other side of the coin (that the v.few Radical Feminists that I encountered tend to turn on their kind despite what they preach),
- I'm on LJ's side with this one

It's like I said before, when women are joining the men's rights movement, institutionalized misogyny is officially undead.

Not dead because we've got an entire political party that enshrines it, but not alive because nobody else wants institutionalized misogyny anymore.

We're not misogynists. Women don't join our movement to defend traditional roles. Girl Writes What, for instance, just recently scaled a high fucking tree to trim its limbs. You can scarcely get more "unlady-like" than that. (Disclaimer: "unlady-like" is actually bullshit because no one has the right to define what a 'lady' is.) A woman climbing a tree in full climbing gear on her own volition is a liberated woman - and she's one of us. If we hated women as lovecraft68 keeps drumming on about, such a woman would not be one of us.

 

[hashtag45]

pollynova is actually one of the really nice w. on this site. Never seen her target or say mean things to anyone

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

I am not a "feminist" at all. And I don't "go after" men.

Then why did you absolutely and blatantly ignore the subject of WOMEN in the men's movement and go right for the raw meat of hatred with your spiel about teh evil menz movement?

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

pollynova is actually one of the really nice w. on this site. Never seen her target or say mean things to anyone

I'm trying to get a discussion going about women in the men's rights movement and all we've gotten so far is "the men's rights movement is taken over by losers who can't get laid and somehow that's a woman's fault."

Which is exactly what the OP was talking about: no one wants to talk about the women in the movement.

Why?

 

[pollynova]

Then why did you absolutely and blatantly ignore the subject of WOMEN in the men's movement and go right for the raw meat of hatred with your spiel about teh evil menz movement?

I was saying that MRA's aren't taken seriously because they've been filled up with guys who instead of worrying about real issues, complain about being friend-zoned and stuff like that like they are these great injustices being done to men.

 

[pollynova]

LJ, what I am trying to say is that MRA's would be taken more seriously if they focused on issues that affect men, like parental rights, instead of getting wrapped up in completely useless crap, gamergate for example.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

I was saying that MRA's aren't taken seriously because they've been filled up with guys who instead of worrying about real issues, complain about being friend-zoned and stuff like that like they are these great injustices being done to men.

I've spoken a lot about the friendzone - and I've said, quite often, that the solution is to hit the dating matchup sites and find someone else to pursue, instead of trying to waste time mashing through a woman's friendzone in hopes of getting into her relationship zone.

But this has nothing to do with the topic... the topic of women in the movement.

What's it going to take to get people to talk about women in the men's rights movement? Or is no one capable of that? Is this going to remain a growing blindspot that feminists simply are not going to bother with until it consumes them?

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

LJ, what I am trying to say is that MRA's would be taken more seriously if they focused on issues that affect men, like parental rights, instead of getting wrapped up in completely useless crap, gamergate for example.

There are a LOT of women in Gamergate, like, a hell of a lot. It started because feminists used the Jack Thompson maneuver against video games - now that is the silly behavior right there.

You cannot go around accusing gamers of being rapists and accusing video games of promoting misogyny and not expect a backlash. It goes both ways.

And again, there's a hell of a lot of women in Gamergate.

 

[badbabysitter]

There are a LOT of women in Gamergate, like, a hell of a lot. It started because feminists used the Jack Thompson maneuver against video games - now that is the silly behavior right there.

no.. it started because an angry ex accused his girlfriend of fucking around and encouraged her harrasment


and you are aware that Jack Thompson has received gamergate support, right?

You cannot go around accusing gamers of being rapists

can you point out where Zoe Quin who was the flashpoint ever accused anyone of being a rapist?

and accusing video games of promoting misogyny and not expect a backlash.

noting that some games can be misogynistic.. does not mean it's not a valid opinion

an appropirate backlash would have been a counterargument... not death and rape threats.. just sayin

It goes both ways.

And again, there's a hell of a lot of women in Gamergate.

and there's a hell of a lot of women diametrically opposed to it

gamergate does not speak for women.. just as those that oppose it dont speak for women either

 

[badbabysitter]

Is this woman all that frightening to feminists around the world? Probably. Considering this.

Of course we know why nobody responds to stuff like this - nobody can call a WOMAN a fucking woman hating potential rapist.

feminists aren't frightened of women holding different opinions

we just dont take MRA women as having credible voices


Bloomfield is now synonymous with libel. Prizzey was once credible but has been veering off into batshit crazy as the years go on. And Straughan's faith in neutony would get her eaten alive in any debate and detract from anything positive she could say without the spectre of her being a closet bigot anytime she talked rearing up.


The MRA is sorely lacking positve role models, and that's what the problem is

it's hard to talk about the draft with someone standing up for men's rights like Paul Elam who is a dead beat dad

it's hard to discuss felony sentences with Vox Day knowing he's an unrepentant racist

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

and you are aware that Jack Thompson has received gamergate support, right?

I was going to spend time knocking down all the other bullshit you wrote, but the fact that you wrote this right here explains everything.

This statement is more wrong than the people who say the Earth is 6000 years old. But then everything else you said was just as looneytunes.

Gamergate compares Anita Sarkeesian to Jack Thompson. They're friends of neither.

 

[badbabysitter]

I was going to spend time knocking down all the other bullshit you wrote, but the fact that you wrote this right here explains everything.

This statement is more wrong than the people who say the Earth is 6000 years old. But then everything else you said was just as looneytunes.

Gamergate compares Anita Sarkeesian to Jack Thompson. They're friends of neither.

Yeah, you were going to... but you didnt... like you typically don't when I bring up Quinn

and as for Jack Thompson

“The Sarkeesian Effect” producers recently interviewed Jack Thompson in a hilarious bit of irony. This has to be causing the GamerGate community some semblance of introspection, because if it’s not then things are worse than I anticipated.

See, Jack Thompson was a lawyer who was hell-bent on writing actual LAWS (ie: government enforced censorship) to prevent games that HE PERSONALLY didn’t like from being made. For the better part of the mid 90‘s and early 2000‘s, Jack Thompson was the man the entire gaming community was fighting AGAINST. Jack Thompson was also disbarred for unethical practices...

Anita Sarkeesian (no matter WHAT you might think of her) is a feminist critic who did a series of videos about analyzing sexism in the games industry (criticism, not censorship). Sadly the people behind “The Sarkeesian Effect” conspiracy theory documentary believe that Anita Sarkeesian’s criticisms DOES equal censorship (newsflash: it doesn’t), and have... for whatever batshit insane reason... asked Jack Thompson to be part of their documentary.

This just blows my mind. And I know I said I wouldn’t talk about GamerGate anymore but... seriously what the hell? Has this movement gone completely off the deep end?

The problem is that a lot of GamerGate supporters were ALSO supporters of “The Sarkeesian Effect,” with prominent members like thunderf00t spearheading a lot of the initial discussion. So this raises quite an ethical dilemma, doesn’t it? If GamerGate ISN’T about censoring feminism or women or whatever... why would prominent members of the community side with a man who was DISBARRED for unethical practices and who was making it his MISSION to BAN and CENSOR video games through the use of the Government?

BUT... if GamerGate denounces thunderf00t and “The Sarkeesian Effect” for their actions, then they’ve got to be in a position where they have to look at their goals, and how they’ve gone about achieving them with SOME degree of introspection, right? You cannot be saying GamerGate is about ethics and is against censorship by siding WITH someone who has no ethics and IS about censorship, right

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

feminists aren't frightened of women holding different opinions

we just dont take MRA women as having credible voices

And that is a vast, gaping weak spot in your ideology. Their voices are just as credible as yours, and your REAL problem with them is that you cannot evoke images of MRA women as neckbeard rapists hiding in wait to jump you from the nearest alley.

They're women

and as such you can't use your standard "teh evil menz" ammo against them. And they're not even Republicans... so you can't even use the anti-Stepford Wives ammo against them.

"we just dont take MRA women as having credible voices" is your way of saying your entire cause is built around fear of men, and when your opponent turns out to be a woman, you have no standard operating procedure to cover that.

Bloomfield is now synonymous with libel. Prizzey was once credible but has been veering off into batshit crazy as the years go on. And Straughan's faith in neutony would get her eaten alive in any debate and detract from anything positive she could say without the spectre of her being a closet bigot anytime she talked rearing up.

Bloomfield aka Judgybitch has eaten feminists alive in head-on confrontations. ESPECIALLY Manboobz. ESPECIALLY because you guys tried to use your anti-male SOP against her and you were found to be totally irrelevant to her offensive strategy against you.

Feminists tried to kill Erin Pizzey's dog, that's how batshit crazy you guys are about her. Now you're making up lies about how she's gone crazy? Her "batshit crazy" has had her being the guest of honor at more international events and opened more domestic violence shelters than you've been in arguments with me. I will give you this, she (like the others) is in with A Voice for Men and it's not wise to be in any kind of cahoots with them.

And ANY feminist against Karen Straughan is like Alexis Davis when she took on Rhonda Rousey. By the time the echo fades from the bell ring any feminist she argues with will be on the ground with third degree burns over 80% of their ego. That won't be a debate, it'll be an execution, and she'll be the one left spraying Clorox on her axe.

it's hard to talk about the draft with someone standing up for men's rights like Paul Elam who is a dead beat dad

There you go, bringing up men again. You're talking to a dude who called Elam out BEFORE people discovered he was a deadbeat dad. You're talking to a dude who has called out MRA people more often than you have ever called out any feminist.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Yeah, you were going to... but you didnt... like you typically don't when I bring up Quinn

and as for Jack Thompson

“The Sarkeesian Effect” producers recently interviewed Jack Thompson in a hilarious bit of irony. This has to be causing the GamerGate community some semblance of introspection, because if it’s not then things are worse than I anticipated.

See, Jack Thompson was a lawyer who was hell-bent on writing actual LAWS (ie: government enforced censorship) to prevent games that HE PERSONALLY didn’t like from being made. For the better part of the mid 90‘s and early 2000‘s, Jack Thompson was the man the entire gaming community was fighting AGAINST. Jack Thompson was also disbarred for unethical practices...

Anita Sarkeesian (no matter WHAT you might think of her) is a feminist critic who did a series of videos about analyzing sexism in the games industry (criticism, not censorship). Sadly the people behind “The Sarkeesian Effect” conspiracy theory documentary believe that Anita Sarkeesian’s criticisms DOES equal censorship (newsflash: it doesn’t), and have... for whatever batshit insane reason... asked Jack Thompson to be part of their documentary.

This just blows my mind. And I know I said I wouldn’t talk about GamerGate anymore but... seriously what the hell? Has this movement gone completely off the deep end?

The problem is that a lot of GamerGate supporters were ALSO supporters of “The Sarkeesian Effect,” with prominent members like thunderf00t spearheading a lot of the initial discussion. So this raises quite an ethical dilemma, doesn’t it? If GamerGate ISN’T about censoring feminism or women or whatever... why would prominent members of the community side with a man who was DISBARRED for unethical practices and who was making it his MISSION to BAN and CENSOR video games through the use of the Government?

BUT... if GamerGate denounces thunderf00t and “The Sarkeesian Effect” for their actions, then they’ve got to be in a position where they have to look at their goals, and how they’ve gone about achieving them with SOME degree of introspection, right? You cannot be saying GamerGate is about ethics and is against censorship by siding WITH someone who has no ethics and IS about censorship, right

Wait, this is a third party person from Reddit making this accusation? And you believe them because they said so?