So it's Charleston this time

Tragic. If someone at the church had been armed the attacker could well be dead now instead of on the run.

That is precisely the logic which led to nuclear weapons for North Korea and Pakistan, and is leading to them for Iran.
 
attachment.php


http://www.newsweek.com/report-nine-shot-charleston-south-carolina-church-shooting-344235


:(
 

Attachments

  • charleston.jpg
    charleston.jpg
    48.7 KB · Views: 0
That is precisely the logic which led to nuclear weapons for North Korea and Pakistan, and is leading to them for Iran.

We are obviously headed for a long, hot, bloody summer in the US and I wouldn't blame anyone who is currently unarmed for buying a firearm of some type to protect himself or herself, family, friends, and acquaintances. Better to have one and not need it than to need one and not have it.
 
We are obviously headed for a long, hot, bloody summer in the US and I wouldn't blame anyone who is currently unarmed for buying a firearm of some type to protect himself or herself, family, friends, and acquaintances. Better to have one and not need it than to need one and not have it.

I am not agreeing or disagreeing, sir. I merely point out that the same underlying logic is what drives countries fearful of powerful and dangerous neighbours to seek the nuclear weapon - something which the US is, in public at least, keen to avoid.
 
I am not agreeing or disagreeing, sir. I merely point out that the same underlying logic is what drives countries fearful of powerful and dangerous neighbours to seek the nuclear weapon - something which the US is, in public at least, keen to avoid.

If you can prevent an enemy from becoming armed with a particularly dangerous weapon it's logical to do so. It's also logical for the enemy to try to obtain such a weapon, of course. In my view, it's better to prevent the acquisition than to allow it, no matter what it takes to do so. I think Israel agrees with me, and will do whatever it takes to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power. Obama certainly won't.
 
If you can prevent an enemy from becoming armed with a particularly dangerous weapon it's logical to do so. It's also logical for the enemy to try to obtain such a weapon, of course. In my view, it's better to prevent the acquisition than to allow it, no matter what it takes to do so. I think Israel agrees with me, and will do whatever it takes to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power. Obama certainly won't.

Then we are in agreement. It just annoys me to see double standards.
 
Gun-free zone.

:cool:

Paging Al Sharpton, paging Al Sharpton!

Time for the usual Liberal Kabuki...

Blame white people!

Blame guns!

Wingers!

A_J!

:p
 
Let's have a discussion about the war on white males.

;) ;)

Eventually some of them are going to lash out in their frustration just like those poor misunderstood and beloved Muzzies...
 
Gun-free zone.

:cool:

Paging Al Sharpton, paging Al Sharpton!

Time for the usual Liberal Kabuki...

Blame white people!

Blame guns!

Wingers!

A_J!

:p

As Night Follows The Day, Sharpton On Way To Charleston

AL SHARPTON PRESS CONFERENCE

Just what Charleston needs, haven’t they suffered enough?

Via Breaking 911:

Reverend Al Sharpton Is Headed To Charleston, National Action Network Confirms
 
Yes, I WAS tired when I started the thread. And sad.

Because when racists, sexists, jilted partners, politically deluded, anti-whatever, mad at society in general and/or religious fundamentalists of any denomination, can lay their hands on guns and kill so many people with such ease, I can't help feeling that more needs to be done.

Sure, guns need a human to pull the trigger, but since they are 1) so fucking efficient at killing and 2) since so many criminal and damaged people manage to lay their hands on them - successfully destroying innocent people's lives - something new has to be tried.
 
Yes, I WAS tired when I started the thread. And sad.

Because when racists, sexists, jilted partners, politically deluded, anti-whatever, mad at society in general and/or religious fundamentalists of any denomination, can lay their hands on guns and kill so many people with such ease, I can't help feeling that more needs to be done.

Sure, guns need a human to pull the trigger, but since they are 1) so fucking efficient at killing and 2) since so many criminal and damaged people manage to lay their hands on them - successfully destroying innocent people's lives - something new has to be tried.
stfu with this LIB shit

where teh fuck is your thread about 30 BLACKS gunned down by BLACKS in Balt last month.....you musta missed that while you were screaming at the PO LEECE

stfu, crawl back to your degenerate LIB hole
 
You wanna see my degenerate LIB hole? :eek:

Surprisingly (or not), the threat that you might be nice to me stops that from ever happening. However... :cattail: <-- degenerate pussy
 
Back
Top