Equal Rights Amendment

gotsnowgotslush

skates like Eck
Joined
Dec 24, 2007
Posts
25,720
ERA was not ratified.

3 states made sure that it did not pass.

Minnesota Group Seeks to Restart Equal Rights Amendment Effort
3/05/2015

Efforts to pass the Equal Rights Amendment have gone on for decades. It was proposed in 1923. The U.S. Senate and House passed it in 1972. Since then, 35 of the 38 needed states ratified the amendment by the 1982 deadline.

The amendment would be the 28th in the Bill of Rights and would read, "Equality of rights under the law shall not be abridged or denied on account of gender."

Supporters of the ERA rallied Thursday.
 
OH but on other accounts by all means....:rolleyes:

Further more what rights does one gender have that the other doesn't??:confused:
 
ERA was not ratified.

3 states made sure that it did not pass.

Minnesota Group Seeks to Restart Equal Rights Amendment Effort
3/05/2015

Efforts to pass the Equal Rights Amendment have gone on for decades. It was proposed in 1923. The U.S. Senate and House passed it in 1972. Since then, 35 of the 38 needed states ratified the amendment by the 1982 deadline.

The amendment would be the 28th in the Bill of Rights and would read, "Equality of rights under the law shall not be abridged or denied on account of gender."

Supporters of the ERA rallied Thursday.

If there were 15 states that voted against it, that means there were 15 - not three - states that made sure it was not valid.

Actually, it might have been invalid anyhow. The amendment specified a time limit for ratification, and that limit expired. Congress then voted, by a small majority, to extend the time limit. Since a 2/3 majority is needed to amend the Constitution, that extension was not valid. Additionally, some states voted to rescind their "Aye" votes, and the final total was well under the necessary majority.

As Bot said, which gender has rights the other does not have? :confused: There are certain privileges and courtesies extended to women, and women used to exclusively enjoy certain rights, but those rights have now been repealed or superseded.
 
If there were 15 states that voted against it, that means there were 15 - not three - states that made sure it was not valid.

Actually, it might have been invalid anyhow. The amendment specified a time limit for ratification, and that limit expired. Congress then voted, by a small majority, to extend the time limit. Since a 2/3 majority is needed to amend the Constitution, that extension was not valid. Additionally, some states voted to rescind their "Aye" votes, and the final total was well under the necessary majority.

As Bot said, which gender has rights the other does not have? :confused: There are certain privileges and courtesies extended to women, and women used to exclusively enjoy certain rights, but those rights have now been repealed or superseded.
They didn't vote against the amendment, they simply didn't ratify it. It's an important difference.
 
They didn't vote against the amendment, they simply didn't ratify it. It's an important difference.

Okay, they voted against ratifying it. By so doing, they showed their disdain for the amendment. I don't see much difference. :confused:
 
Women have the right to vote without being drafted.

LOL and nothing about that amendment will ever change that. It says equal rights, not equal obligations. ;)

The feminist groups nation wide would shit brix and rally against the evil oppression of the patriarchy....
 
LOL and nothing about that amendment will ever change that. It says equal rights, not equal obligations. ;)

The feminist groups nation wide would shit brix and rally against the evil oppression of the patriarchy....

Because you're under the commonplace delusion that feminist groups haven't been fighting that law for 40 years
 
Because you're under the commonplace delusion that feminist groups haven't been fighting that law for 40 years

:rolleyes: LOL yea and all 3 1/2 women fighting it are doing a real bang up job.

Get back to me when there is a ten million woman march to gain extra civil responsibilities/obligations.

the right to do whatever they want with their genitals

How exactly in what way are women restricted from doing whatever they want with their genitals?

We just saw articles linked of grown ass women fucking boys and walking on it....something we regularly crucify men for. LT post new ones like every other week.

Seems women can do MORE with their genitals than men. So you're going to have to cite SPECIFIC LAWS prhibiting women from doing things with their genitals that men are allowed to do.

You can't even say special forces/combat arms anymore.......none of it.

You're all out of martyr fuel sister....time to start generating some stuff to QQ about, think fast!
 
Last edited:
:rolleyes: LOL yea and all 3 1/2 women fighting it are doing a real bang up job.


just because you are completely fucking clueless about the history of a subject doesnt make your opinion a fact


Get back to me when there is a ten million woman march to gain extra civil responsibilities/obligations.


you mean like the ones men make to oppose the draft? oh right, those have never happened either... congratulations on the straw man though, I like his hat


How exactly in what way are women restricted from doing whatever they want with their genitals?

access to healthcare, being allowed to decide if they keep a clump of cells in their body or not... you really should know, actually learn something about reproductive rights

We just saw articles linked of grown ass women fucking boys and walking on it....something we regularly crucify men for. AJ post new ones like every other week.


yet we also see the same thing about grown men doing the same.... but I like that situational outrage right there.. women do this BAD! men do this, meh, whatever

Seems women can do MORE with their genitals than men.

Like what exactly legally?

So you're going to have to cite SPECIFIC LAWS prhibiting women from doing things with their genitals that men are allowed to do.


if a woman wants to get an abortion yet needs legal permission, has to drive three states, can be arrested for taking medicationif she's pregant... those are all prohibitions....... how many men have been arrested for popping pillswhile being pregnant?

You can't even say special forces/combat arms anymore.......none of it.

I didnt in the first place... dont assign me a position and criticize me for it.. get enought of that from LT

You're all out of martyr fuel sister....time to start generating some stuff to QQ about, think fast!


you should try.... learning..anything about women.. sometime,It might help
 
just because you are completely fucking clueless about the history of a subject doesnt make your opinion a fact

you mean like the ones men make to oppose the draft? oh right, those have never happened either... congratulations on the straw man though, I like his hat

LOL they've never even made a splash in the political scene, they are micro minority that couldn't get 5 min from a senator if they tried.

It's not a straw man, I never argued men didn't oppose the draft. I oppose it...hell. But don't come here peddling that bullshit about some great womenz crusade to undertake such a heavy...heavy burden....LOL because you're full of shit. Women don't want to be drafted and the ones who think they have the civil obligation are the micro minority no one will listen to anyhow because it's fucking dumb.

access to healthcare, being allowed to decide if they keep a clump of cells in their body or not... you really should know, actually learn something about reproductive rights

Name the state that doesn't allow women access to healthcare or decide to have an abortion or not...I triple hot dog fuckin' dare you toots......it's ok, I'll wait :D

yet we also see the same thing about grown men doing the same....

Nooooooooooo grown men do not fuck teen girls/students and get to do light time on a fucking ankle bracelet. They go to a pen and a good number don't make it out...get fucking real and cut the bullshit.

but I like that situational outrage right there.. women do this BAD! men do this, meh, whatever

Yes when women fuck children bad....Men meh? Men's sentencing for being kiddy fuckers is WAY harsher than womens, regardless of your all women always victims all the time bullshit.

Like what exactly legally?

Fuck kids apparently.....

if a woman wants to get an abortion

She's just got to make an appointment at a doctors office and go....all 50 states.

yet needs legal permission,

Last I checked, only if she's under age....tough shit kids don't have legal authority to consent to medical operations of any kind in this country. That's not sexism so peddle that bullshit to an idiot who's buying your snake oil.

has to drive three states,

Liar....abortions are legal in all 50 states.

can be arrested for taking medicationif she's pregant... those are all prohibitions....... how many men have been arrested for popping pillswhile being pregnant?

I wasn't even pregnant and got pinched for popping pills.....I have a penis, anyone popping pills in violation of directions or prescription is subject to punitive measures under the law, both sexes. Sorry your argument fails again.

I didnt in the first place... dont assign me a position and criticize me for it.. get enought of that from LT

L2Read k? That was an example of things you can't claim are holding women back...I never said you claimed women couldn't do those things. I'm saying they have all the same legal rights/privileges/opportunities as men.

Now name the law prohibiting women from legal privileges/opportunities/rights that men enjoy or GTFO with your bullshit.

you should try.... learning..anything about women.. sometime,It might help

You should try working on your reading comprehension, that might help you.

Name the rights women don't have that men do......State or federal, it's black and white if it exist you should have no problem citing it.

Or you can be sane and just admit women can do all the same shit men can.
 
Last edited:
LOL they've never even made a splash in the political scene, they are micro minority that couldn't get 5 min from a senator if they tried.


once again , simply because you have no knowledge of a subject doesnt make your opinion a fact.. the very first lawsuit against selective service was by a feminist organization, and the second, the third, the fourth,the fifth and the 6th.... LT likes to claim men made the first suit.. but they only made the first suit since 2005

It's not a straw man, I never argued men didn't oppose the draft. I oppose it...hell. But don't come here peddling that bullshit about some great womenz crusade to undertake such a heavy...heavy burden....LOL because you're full of shit. Women don't want to be drafted and the ones who think they have the civil obligation are the micro minority no one will listen to anyhow because it's fucking dumb.


it is dumb... but I dont think you understand the reason why the suits are made in the first place.. and based on your complete lack of knowledge of the suits in the first place i can see why it's easy to reach such a dumbass conclusion..... by making this actions against the governemnt the attempt is to show how bad the idea of the selective service is in the first place



Name the state that doesn't allow women access to healthcare or decide to have an abortion or not...I triple hot dog fuckin' dare you toots......it's ok, I'll wait :D


now you're trying to move the goalposts.. wow, that's sooooo unlike you whenever I bring up women and access to healthcare.... since you cant argue with me that women face major restrictions under the law concerning healthcare and abortion.. you're jumping to the only escape clause you have... " just because they have to jump through several hoops to avoid fines and imprisonment, doesnt mean they aren't allowed!!!! yay I win!"



Nooooooooooo grown men do not fuck teen girls/students and get to do light time on a fucking ankle bracelet. They go to a pen and a good number don't make it out...get fucking real and cut the bullshit.

that's so full of shit.. all I would have to do is bring up one single solitary guy that got a walk to demolish this...... but please, move the goalposts again, I like to see where they are now



Yes when women fuck children bad....Men meh? Men's sentencing for being kiddy fuckers is WAY harsher than womens, regardless of your all women always victims all the time bullshit.


sentencing is not the same as getting a walk.. which you just claim they did.. see? that was me pulling a BotanyBoy


Fuck kids apparently.....

in your limited understanding of reality , sure



She's just got to make an appointment at a doctors office and go....all 50 states.


and bring a lawyer... just like men have to do when they get a prostate exam


Last I checked, only if she's under age

in your state perhaps.. plenty of states have much different laws

....tough shit kids don't have legal authority to consent to medical operations of any kind in this country.

read above


That's not sexism so peddle that bullshit to an idiot who's buying your snake oil.


I'm already talking to an idiot that doesnt have any knowledge of what he's talking about



Liar....abortions are legal in all 50 states.


did I say she want allowedt get them in her state? being allowed and being physically capable are two different things... you do realize there are laws that let hospitals dictate who is allowed to perform abortions in hospitals.. and if they cant perform them there.. they simply arent performed... some states have less then 3 places where doctors are allowed to actually perform abortions..... yet somehow you dont think that makes essentially prohibited?



I wasn't even pregnant and got pinched for popping pills.....I have a penis, anyone popping pills in violation of directions or prescription is subject to punitive measures under the law, both sexes. Sorry your argument fails again.


so you went to jail for taking prescribed medication?

no? sorry then, your argument fails



L2Read k? That was an example of things you can't claim are holding women back...I never said you claimed women couldn't do those things. I'm saying they have all the same legal rights/privileges/opportunities as men.

except they dont... you dont have restrictions on what you're allowed to do with your genitals.. you can walk into any hospital in the land and get a doctor to treat your penis.. untill that's the same for a woman seeking an abortion it wont be the same opportunity

Now name the law prohibiting women from legal privileges/opportunities/rights that men enjoy or GTFO with your bullshit.



You should try working on your reading comprehension, that might help you.



Name the rights women don't have that men do......State or federal, it's black and white if it exist you should have no problem citing it.


read above... just because you dont have knowledge about something, doesnt make you right

Or you can be sane and just admit women can do all the same shit men can.


or you can...learn something... for a change
 
it is dumb... but I dont think you understand the reason why the suits are made in the first place.

Doesn't matter, they are micro fringe, no one cares, esp women and until all the men have been put through the meat grinder it' ain't fuckin ever happening.

now you're trying to move the goalposts.. wow, that's sooooo unlike you whenever I bring up women and access to healthcare.

I'm not moving the goalpost, read the title dumb shit...the topic is equal rights....not what YOU consider undue restrictions.

since you cant argue with me that women face major restrictions under the law concerning healthcare and abortion..

I'm not arguing that there are restrictions...there are fuckin' restrictions on EVERYTHING...LITERALLY EVERY-FUCKING-THING. Yes that includes medical procedures of EVERY kind.

you're jumping to the only escape clause you have... " just because they have to jump through several hoops to avoid fines and imprisonment, doesnt mean they aren't allowed!!!! yay I win!"

Yea...they are allowed, just like all sorts of medical procedures.

that's so full of shit.. all I would have to do is bring up one single solitary guy that got a walk to demolish this...... but please, move the goalposts again, I like to see where they are now sentencing is not the same as getting a walk.. which you just claim they did.. see? that was me pulling a BotanyBoy


in your limited understanding of reality , sure

Doing probation on an ankle bracelet for fucking a kid? That is walking.

No male gets convicted for kiddy fucking and goes home with a fucking ankle bracelet on.

and bring a lawyer... just like men have to do when they get a prostate exam

LOL WHAT? What state do you have to have a lawyer to go get an abortion?

Or is this another one of your claims you can't back up because you think it's 1904 or some shit?

in your state perhaps..

In all states....if you know of another state where an adult woman has to have someone else's permission name it or STFU with your bullshit.

plenty of states have much different laws

read above

Seriously...read above. I bet you can't name a single fucking one cuz you full of shit.

I'm already talking to an idiot that doesnt have any knowledge of what he's talking about

Says the woman who's made claims galore but completely failed to point out a single example of ANY of them.

did I say she want allowedt get them in her state?

You said "has to drive three states"....no woman has to drive 3 states over to get an abortion....it's not 1965 anymore retard. Welcome to 2015, any woman can pick up the phone in any state and get an appointment to have an abortion.

being allowed and being physically capable are two different things...

What you want valet abortions or WTF?

Pick up the phone...make an apt go see doc, done.

you do realize there are laws that let hospitals dictate who is allowed to perform abortions in hospitals.. and if they cant perform them there.. they simply arent performed.

You realize that's the same for all operations in a hospital right? :confused: A cardiologist can't just fill in for a neurosurgeon b/c the brain doc decided to go golf....

.. some states have less then 3 places where doctors are allowed to actually perform abortions.....

Which ones? And that is still legal access.....that's what the people of that state want.

yet somehow you dont think that makes essentially prohibited?

No I don't think just because a woman can't have an instant, at home, at will cost and pain free abortion she is prohibited from getting one.

I think when she can't pick up the phone and get help that is there but inaccesable because vagina, she's prohibited and discriminated against.


so you went to jail for taking prescribed medication?

no? sorry then, your argument fails

Yep I sure did......sorry you're still failing. Arrest for pill poppin is not a womenz rights issue no matter how bad you want it to be. Sounds more like you have a beef with the war on drugz.

except they dont... you dont have restrictions on what you're allowed to do with your genitals..

Neither do you.

you can walk into any hospital in the land and get a doctor to treat your penis..

Most hospitals, I wont say all, but every single one I have been to in this country in the past 20 years have entire wings dedicated to womens health and can have their vag issues treated on the spot if they have the cash/insurance to get it.

Cry me a river and try again Princess stuck in 1904

untill that's the same for a woman seeking an abortion it wont be the same opportunity

PICK UP THE PHONE!! It's not hard...you can get one in all 50 states, you have to make an appointment. I know that's oppression to you but in the real world that's just how medical operations go...from brain surgery to abortions. Nothing vag hater about it.

read above... just because you dont have knowledge about something, doesnt make you right

or you can...learn something... for a change

If you would just tell me what states have all these oppressive laws prohibiting women from getting medical care for their genitals I would learn...but it seems you're having a lot of trouble backing your buu shit.
 
WTF? Do you ever read a newspaper?

Show me the guy who caught a pedo conviction that ended without going to a pen, just probation on an E leash.....I want to see it.

Because all the ones I see end with 6-10....out in 3-4 on good behavior.
 
Last edited:
Show me the guy who caught a pedo conviction that ended without going to a pen, just probation on an E leash.....I want to see it.

Because all the ones I see end with 6-10....out in 3-4 on good behavior.
This year? Here's three:

http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2015...ce-probation-for-sex-with-underage-volunteer/

http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/st...loyee-gets-probation-child-sex-case/23893715/

http://www.kltv.com/story/28141534/...-probation-2500-fine-for-sex-with-12-year-old
 

The first guy got 150 days in jail for sex with a 17 year old, and it doesn't say if it was a boy or a girl. The second guy tried to entice a 15 year old boy into sex. If it had been a 15 year old girl, it would have been a different matter.

The third guy got off ridiculously easy. The judge must have been bribed, or something like that. :mad:
 
Back
Top