LJ_Reloaded
バクスター の
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Posts
- 21,217
http://www.tampabay.com/news/courts/he-says-he-said-no-to-sex-now-says-no-to-child-support/1183449
consensual sexual encounters.
It's only consentual if it's a woman and a boy. It's rape if it's a man and a girl.
That's feminism, ladies and gentlemen.
Let the namecalling commence. But I stand 100% right and unbeatable on this one. And practically every other point I make, too.
They dated, on and off, for three years.
On Jan. 6, 2006, when he was still 17 and she was 18, they had sex in the back seat of a car and made a baby she named Joshua.
A paternity test confirmed Kris was the father.
Kris was not present at Joshua's birth.
He did not contribute anything — not time, not money — to Joshua's care.
Jessica never asked Kris for help.
In March 2009, Kris got a letter from the state of Michigan. Jessica had moved there and gone on welfare and Michigan wanted Kris to start paying child support.
Kris hired a lawyer. He said he shouldn't have to pay child support because he never wanted the baby.
Jessica, he said, raped him.
Around the country there are plenty of cases of underage boys who got a woman pregnant and then tried to avoid paying child support. The 15-year-old in California who was seduced by the 34-year-old mom next door. The 13-year-old boy in Kansas who had sex with his 17-year-old baby*sitter. The 15-year-old boy in Florida who impregnated a 20-year-old.
Under a strict interpretation of the law, these boys, by virtue of their age, were raped. But family courts have seen these incidents for what they were: consensual sexual encounters.
consensual sexual encounters.
It's only consentual if it's a woman and a boy. It's rape if it's a man and a girl.
That's feminism, ladies and gentlemen.
Let the namecalling commence. But I stand 100% right and unbeatable on this one. And practically every other point I make, too.