Fair Vs Stupid

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

The lawyers up in Boston are conflicted about a fair jury for the poor baby Muslim terrorist who detonated the marathon bomb.

Who's more fair than folks who know what happened?

If you show your ass in front of a judge you don't get a jury or a trial, you get sentenced. The judge saw what happened.

I don't get why lawyers argue for jurors who are senseless and stunned (stupid) about assessing the facts. The case isn't a WHODUNNIT.

 

[unregistered]

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

My point is: How come familiarity with the facts is a problem? I mean, is justice the goal?

I once observed a woman attack a cop. The cop was cuffing the womans brother when the woman jumped onto the cops back. She then fled and filed a criminal complaint against the cop. But I saw the whole deal.

Then police supervision went nutz attempting to fuck the cop. But they couldn't because I was a state officer who observed what happened. I was, as they say, unimpeachable. I told Internal Affairs, TRY AND FUCK HIM AND I'LL MAKE YOU LOOK LIKE SHIT. I already knew the sister was a drug addict, bipolar POS.

 

[kbate]

The case is: My Dead Brother did it and forced me to run with him.

Convict him, but let me go because he was the bad guy, I didn't know what he was up to, I didn't know.

Failure to move the trial to a city where the bomb didn't go off would be wrong and risk reversal on appeal. Even if the city is Springfield Massachusetts, it has to be moved in order to give the approximation of a fair trial.

If they'd charged the White cop who shot Michael Brown, would you insist he be tried in Ferguson, the community that knew him best?

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

The case is: My Dead Brother did it and forced me to run with him.

Convict him, but let me go because he was the bad guy, I didn't know what he was up to, I didn't know.

Failure to move the trial to a city where the bomb didn't go off would be wrong and risk reversal on appeal. Even if the city is Springfield Massachusetts, it has to be moved in order to give the approximation of a fair trial.

If they'd charged the White cop who shot Michael Brown, would you insist he be tried in Ferguson, the community that knew him best?

I'm speaking IN GENERAL. Why are stupid jurors preferable to informed jurors? I was rejected for jury duty after I revealed my career with the state. The defendant beat his teen's ass and Ma called the cops. I woulda been a guaranteed vote to acquit but they assumed I'm a bleeding heart ass apple.

I was ready to acquit when the state attorney said, CAN YOU CONVICT EVEN IF THERES NO MARKS OR BRUISES ON THE TEEN? The state loses every case where there are no marks or bruises on a teen.

 

[KingOrfeo]

Who's more fair than folks who know what happened?

Folks who know what happened are supposed to be witnesses, not jurors.

 

[Busybody]

Legal bullshit, he has a right to be tried by his peers, that doesn't mean somebody in another town or city. Who in America doesn't have an opinion on what happened?

Muslim TERRORISTS?

or

LIT posters?

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

Folks who know what happened are supposed to be witnesses, not jurors.

Like when we see teevee replays of vids?

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

Muslim TERRORISTS?

or

LIT posters?

^^^^^GUTS GLORY SAM!

I saw it on teevee.