Why is the media promoting transgenderism so heavily?

I would have sworn conflict was necessary to a good story.

Life transgendered must be rife with conflict.

What pisses me off is Netflix promoting felonism by streaming Orange is the New Black.

You have added a lot to this thread, thank you for your insight.
 
But I have not laid out a case for anything as of yet. (I don't even have a "case" yet, not even in my mind) You call it a conspiracy in an attempt to marginalize me as a kook. It is a way for you to righteously dismiss me without giving my questions any merit. You are dismissing me for going against the grain by merely raising questions. You do it because in your mind the case is closed so now it is us against them.

Very frightening for Western society.

Really?
Let me see if I remember two of your questions correctly.....

But who is doing the controlling? And what is the end game?
 
And why is it that my even asking the question is going to brand me a bigot?

...

What the fuck is happening here? The percentage of transgenders is 0.05% of the population or less. Why have we been groomed to accept this as normal?

Because Social Justice movements become industries unto themselves and cannot end in victory; defeat will never happen because they are fueled by the altruism of outraged moral busybodies and guided by a frustrated intellectual class and each victory leads only to the next battle. When they have achieved their last human goal, then there are Real Dolls™ and now sex robots which will need to be mainstreamed.

The intellectual class needs to be of worth to society, as we all do. However, in a Democracy, the unwashed masses do not need or wish the guidance of the intellectual and this frustrates not the entire class, but that subset of lesser intellectuals who are not recognized for their works and thoughts. This frustration is loosed upon the masses through the college campus as they claim a right and duty to educate our children to values that are designed to shatter Democracy and lead to an Oligarchy in which they are, as in times of old and Kings and Queens, once again, the valued confidants and advisors.

[following the argument of Eric Hoffer in The Ordeal of Change with additional thoughts of my own guided by 50 years of observation]
 
Just got finished reading the last few pages of this thread. The conversation going on here supports what I quoted above.

Yes.

Tyranny is preferred by the intellectual because he has a hand in it and will tolerate not dissent from his plans for he is sated with control and that alleviates the frustration of not being, in effect, a new-age da Vinci...
 
Free speech and due process are being eroded,

How do you figure that?

Here's some more articles explaining why that's just not the case. It's a social construct that makes these stats happen because of the way gender differences in training is handled.

So every record held for pure strength and endurance is won by men by a long shot because social construct? Not biology right? You sticking with that.

I don't offer those records because I don't know or care about professional sports. I'm sure they exist.

It's not even sports, it's measures of pure brute strength.....they do exist, they all belong to men.

But I know science,

P'arently not so well because you're arguing that women can take men on a pure brute strength/endurance level and looking pretty bad doing it tossing shooting and horse riding up as example of women being able to crush men with their well known brute strength.

Tell me why is it the male world record for dead lifting is SEVEN FUCKING TIMES what the female record is? :confused: Why do you think the fastest male runner creamed the fasted female marathon runner by almost TWO FUCKING MILES BRO!! Talk about getting your ASS whipped WHOOOOO!!!

It' ain't social construct guy, it's biology........I fucking promise. ;)

so here's some more of that explaining why these stats exist, and it's not "men are just stronger'. It's a complex social issue that can be addressed.

No...it's a purely physiological one. Men have more muscle mass, lung capacity, bone density.

Men move faster, further and hit harder than their female counterparts by a land slide and it has fuck all to do with social constructs. That's why when there is a MvF physical confrontation 9 out of 10 times it's the woman who get's her ass beat, even when she is bigger.

It's simple math high speed....

And, apparently everybody in these sports? Is that why I can't shoot? Everyone always made fun of me but maybe my dick was just in the way. If it's apparently just biology that controls sports and not cultural influence from a lifetime of bullshit.

Not a single one of those sports has shit to do with pure brute strength.

And not a single woman you listed holds a match to the men's records....SORRY.

Girls tried golf and tennis....got their ass handed to them. Even in shooting competitions, they might shoot as good, even better but they don't run the course as fast and it shows more the longer the course gets.

And here you are trying to argue for weight lifting, fighting and full contact sports....REALLY??

Why can you just not admit men have more muscle mass than women?

Why can you just not understand that physically speaking, men are stronger by a good margin even in the most extreme examples??

You're average guy in decently fit condition can bench more than the world record for women...get the fuck over it.
 
Last edited:
You have added a lot to this thread, thank you for your insight.

I think that's a much better explanation for Transparent than the Illuminati.

It's a powerful story that resonates with enough people to justify the capital investment.

Sort of like "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner" both made people uncomfortable and captivated them.
 
How do you figure that?



So every record held for pure strength and endurance is won by men by a long shot because social construct? Not biology right? You sticking with that.



It's not even sports, it's measures of pure brute strength.....they do exist, they all belong to men.



P'arently not so well because you're arguing that women can take men on a pure brute strength/endurance level and looking pretty bad doing it tossing shooting and horse riding up as example of women being able to crush men with their well known brute strength.

Tell me why is it the male world record for dead lifting is SEVEN FUCKING TIMES what the female record is? :confused: Why do you think the fastest male runner creamed the fasted female marathon runner by almost TWO FUCKING MILES BRO!! Talk about getting your ASS whipped WHOOOOO!!!

It' ain't social construct guy, it's biology........I fucking promise. ;)



No...it's a purely physiological one. Men have more muscle mass, lung capacity, bone density.

Men move faster, further and hit harder than their female counterparts by a land slide and it has fuck all to do with social constructs. That's why when there is a MvF physical confrontation 9 out of 10 times it's the woman who get's her ass beat, even when she is bigger.

It's simple math high speed....



Not a single one of those sports has shit to do with pure brute strength.

And not a single woman you listed holds a match to the men's records....SORRY.

Girls tried golf and tennis....got their ass handed to them. Even in shooting competitions, they might shoot as good, even better but they don't run the course as fast and it shows more the longer the course gets.

And here you are trying to argue for weight lifting, fighting and full contact sports....REALLY??

Why can you just not admit men have more muscle mass than women?

Why can you just not understand that physically speaking, men are stronger by a good margin even in the most extreme examples??

You're average guy in decently fit condition can bench more than the world record for women...get the fuck over it.

All the women I listed specifically beat men's records, Bot. You're wrong. And sexist. And you should work on it.
 
All the women I listed specifically beat men's records, Bot. You're wrong. And sexist. And you should work on it.

Not in the strength/endurance portions CANDI. Skill for sure...but not in brute strength....

Men have more muscle mass, lung capacity and bone density, FACT.

They can run further faster, lift more and hit harder than women can FACT.

And that is why men and women can't compete in full contact/physical based sports together.....because it's not fair.

Till you show me women even getting fucking CLOSE to men in the brute strength department YOUZ FULL OF SHIT...in total denial of reality and you should work on it.

Weight lifted/repetitions...distance/time run....not horse riding, dancing in some capacity or shooting. Those aren't measures of strength/endurance. Are they physical? Sure...bet none of them can dead lift 1200lbs or run a marathon as fast as a man can.

I along with most sane people think you're full of it. Notice how you are the ONLY fucking person on the board saying women can match men in pure brute strength/muscle energy output?

Get a clue....
 
Last edited:
Not in the strength/endurance portions CANDI. Skill for sure...but not in brute strength....

Men have more muscle mass, lung capacity and bone density, FACT.

They can run further faster, lift more and hit harder than women can FACT.

And that is why men and women can't compete in full contact/physical based sports together.....because it's not fair.

Till you show me women even getting fucking CLOSE to men in the brute strength department YOUZ FULL OF SHIT...in total denial of reality and you should work on it.

Weight lifted/repetitions...distance/time run....not horse riding, dancing in some capacity or shooting. Those aren't measures of strength/endurance. Are they physical? Sure...bet none of them can dead lift 1200lbs or run a marathon as fast as a man can.

I along with most sane people think you're full of it. Notice how you are the ONLY fucking person on the board saying women can match men in pure brute strength/muscle energy output?

Get a clue....

No, I'm the only person trying to educate you. Go back and read about the women I posted or do a three second google search. Some of them were runners, some of them were weightlifters. You're just sexist. That's all there is to it.
 
Also modern science and records are not sexism....they are the truth or the closest possible thing to it given our best information/observations.

Even when they don't suit your luburhul agenda.
 
Also modern science and records are not sexism....they are the truth or the closest possible thing to it given our best information/observations.

Even when they don't suit your luburhul agenda.

Records are, and I've explained why. Science says the exact opposite of what you keep saying, and I've explained that too. So... I'm just gonna not talk to you about this anymore. Because all you want to do is keep up with your kindergarten chant of "boys are better than girls" and then not give any evidence to back that up, because it doesn't exist. You refused to google for yourself marathon runners or weightlifters or whatever, so I looked them up for you. You picked out a few of the sport out of the 14 or so I listed and declared that they were girl sports and didn't count, while ignoring the rest. So... have fun being a sexist asshole. That hurts everyone and is exactly the reason why we need gender rolls broken. So... yup.
 
No, I'm the only person trying to educate you.

Yes, you're the only person here claiming women are just as fast/strong as men when it comes down to sheer brute strength and physical capability. Because you're the only one buying that load of shit.

Go back and read about the women I posted or do a three second google search.

Read every one of them...none of it knocks down what I'm saying. They are all champions, record holders in their own categories.

Not a single fucking one of them ever picked up a 1200lb bar..EVER.

Not a single fucking one of them holds the 400m sprint or marathon run record.

Every one of those is held by men, and by a fairly large margin.

Some of them were runners, some of them were weightlifters.

And they owned ass in the womens group....I take nothing away from that achievement, kudos for them.

But men still hold the run/lift/toss records by a wide margin.

You're just sexist. That's all there is to it.

You're a feminist losing an argument to the pure biological fact that women, just short of a super shot of adrenaline that could cause them severe damage, ain't picking up no fucking 1200lb bar and putting it up. Not even close man....
 
Yes, you're the only person here claiming women are just as fast/strong as men when it comes down to sheer brute strength and physical capability. Because you're the only one buying that load of shit.



Read every one of them...none of it knocks down what I'm saying. They are all champions, record holders in their own categories.

Not a single fucking one of them ever picked up a 1200lb bar..EVER.

Not a single fucking one of them holds the 400m sprint or marathon run record.

Every one of those is held by men, and by a fairly large margin.



And they owned ass in the womens group....I take nothing away from that achievement, kudos for them.

But men still hold the run/lift/toss records by a wide margin.



You're a feminist losing an argument to the pure biological fact that women, just short of a super shot of adrenaline that could cause them severe damage, ain't picking up no fucking 1200lb bar and putting it up. Not even close man....

There is no argument, Bot. Me trying to educate you is not an argument. You claiming to have read something and not understanding it is not an argument. The people I listed by name won unisex records. They beat men at whatever it was they were competing for, including running and weightlifting. You might not like it, but that's simply how the world works. Now, I really do have to go to bed, my gf is tired of me snickering and has midterms tomorrow and wants me to come to bed. But enjoy your sexism.
 
Records are, and I've explained why.

So you're saying the only reason women don't run as fast or can only lift what they can is because records are sexist??

LOL REALLY? You don't think the lack of muscle density has anything to do with it??
http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/61903000/png/_61903750_mmweiolywmnsbclasszoesmith.pnghttps://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSvbHdNN5IyTdpAlyCHtyr2oAh5TIJdZQJYDkkN4kK5SqLqTiCV

Clearly the female champ only WANTS to lift a fraction of the man...because social construct told her so..totally not the muscle density/size/mass issue :rolleyes:

Science says the exact opposite of what you keep saying, and I've explained that too.

No it doesn't...find a medical journal that says women haz moar muscles than menz. I'll shit cold bricks and drive an LB to you personally.

So... I'm just gonna not talk to you about this anymore. Because all you want to do is keep up with your kindergarten chant of "boys are better than girls" and then not give any evidence to back that up, because it doesn't exist.

I never said boys are better than girls...I said they can run further, faster, lift more and hit harder.

You turned that into some kind of "women are inferior" white knight hysteria.

I got all the evidence I need....male performance records of the purely physical type smash women.

You refused to google for yourself marathon runners or weightlifters or whatever, so I looked them up for you. You picked out a few of the sport out of the 14 or so I listed and declared that they were girl sports and didn't count, while ignoring the rest.

I picked the measures of pure brute strength....yes. And just like I said, female records are considerably less than the males.

I dismissed the others because performing arts, no matter how physical, are not measure of sheer brute strength smart guy. That's why 16 year old girls rule at gymnastics and horse riding....not bench press competitions and cage fights.

Sheer kinetic output....pure brute strength....not artistic or marksmanship skills.

What don't you understand about that?

So... have fun being a sexist asshole. That hurts everyone and is exactly the reason why we need gender rolls broken. So... yup.

I'm sexist because facts don't agree with white knight hysteria....RIGHT :rolleyes:

What about the fact that men have more muscle mass/density than women means gender rolls need to be broken? Do you have any idea how fucking ridiculous you sound?? It's so bad I'm wondering if you're serious and completely retarded or if you're just fucking with me for some odd kind of entertainment.
 
Last edited:
Again, I don't follow sports. But science says you're wrong. So if that's true, it's a cultural thing. I've seen women football players beat men, but that was on a highschool, not professional level, and I wasn't paying much attention. I was just forced to be there because there's a thing at my high school every year where the girls team plays the boys team but this girl named Regina, who incidentally I really hated, beat the living shit out of the male quarterback and was later the reason that we couldn't have plastic trays in the cafeteria. So she may have skewed the game. Because she was a fucking bitch.

Just because a girl named Regina beat some guy doesn't mean women = men
I do not know if you have based your science on Regina but the science that i know, and the nature shows that women can't compete with men in physical sports.
 
People have become so senstive that you can't express an opinion without some person getting butthurt.
 
Just because a girl named Regina beat some guy doesn't mean women = men
I do not know if you have based your science on Regina but the science that i know, and the nature shows that women can't compete with men in physical sports.

I'd kick your ass in my sleep.
 
Back
Top