So when is this "Honest" discussion regarding race relations goint to occur?

So are you hypothesizing that nature beats nurture? In every instance?

Most of the time it does. There are exceptions but the numbers are low.
It is very hard for any animal to go against genetics.
Examples. Not all pit bulls are very aggressive but almost all of them are more aggressive than a lab.
Not all jerseys produce more milk than an angus but the majority do.
Not all race horses are fast but most can out run a draft horse.

Genetics control much more than most people think.
 
Clearly not in every case but he implying it's one of if not thee most important factor.

Not in every case. Just the majority.

Let me ask you a question.
If a black man has sex with a black woman and she gets pregnant what are the chances that she will have a black baby?
 
You never do. You're of that class of poster who doesn't offer anything positive to a conversation, you just want to find fault with those who actually do.

One person who has tried to dominate this thread, is actually an old poster from the past trying to catfish us with a new persona and has no intention of holding a conversation either and that is, to a large extent why we can have no honest conversation, here, or anywhere else. If you're not about the full-on Liberal talking point meme, then...

:eek:

You're not smart enough to talk, you're guided by hate, you're nothing but a liar.

Now, if you have some evidence that you want to produce, or something that moves the conversation along, please do so. I have at least tried to do that.

Can you man up?

So AJ, why do you believe that black men commit more violent crimes as stated by the OP?
 
You are, in addition to being a virulent racist, and idiot. Genetics do not play any known part in human behavior, much less is is true that "Most things people do is the result of genetics."

There is no known genetic marker for violence or your stupidity for that matter.

Even if animals were an analog for humans your examples fail. "Pit bulls" are not "bred for violence;" they are trained for violence.

American Staffordshire Terriers are used by those that train dogs for violence because (and only because) they have powerful jaws, strong necks and, like you, thick skulls.

Cocker Spaniels are more apt to bite without provocation than pit bulls and they have not been "bred for violence."

I raised, showed, trained pit bulls for many years. I was even a judge.
Pit bulls were bred for aggression and gameness.
Pit bulls were raised many years before the staffs. They are a watered down version of the pit bull that is not that old. I can see how much you know about pit bulls and would imagine that extends to most other topics.

None of those things you mentioned makes the pit bull any different than any other breed. The thing that makes them difference is gameness. There is not another game bred dog.
 
Stop staring at our eyes with your tits, ma'am

well there's no way I'm going to put my face up publicly, not for these lovely people. But I've never been on a forum without identifying myself somehow :D Would you prefer my ass? :rolleyes:
 
well there's no way I'm going to put my face up publicly, not for these lovely people. But I've never been on a forum without identifying myself somehow :D Would you prefer my ass? :rolleyes:

Legs please.

I would settle for an eyeball. Either one. Unless one of them has that crazy-eye thing going.
 
Back
Top