Proof that AJ's lying through his teeth - again

[Wat_Tyler]

A spot . . . a grope . . a bit thereof.


Off to work for a bit then.

http://33.media.tumblr.com/3529bc2176db1f0ba4ac31114cd69088/tumblr_msgqdu2F4L1st4pd4o1_500.jpg

 

[Noor]

Your constant references to Byron are starting to get a little creepy.

LOL! They say that a person lives on in the memories of others, so maybe AJ is helping Byron live on?

 

[RobDownSouth]

LOL! They say that a person lives on in the memories of others, so maybe AJ is helping Byron live on?

Well, that might be the case, but I for one doubt it. I look at it as a crude appeal to emotion, just like the other times he has invoked Byron's name to garner sympathy for his cause du jour.

 

[islandman]

LOL! They say that a person lives on in the memories of others, so maybe AJ is helping Byron live on?

Unless there was a previously-unknown and intimate friendship between the two, we all (present company excepted) "knew" Byron, yet Gump is the only one to constantly reference Byron, which he uses to legitimize what he's posting.

The fact that he's the ONLY one doing this is the creepy part. That is to say, he's not helping Byron live on so much as he's using the memory of Byron to further his agenda.

 

[butters]

Do you now?

Let's, for the time being, just agree that AJ called the Haitians sub-human.

there can be no disagreement, despite his vociferous lies claiming he never said it or any such thing.

merriam-webster:

1sub·hu·man
adjective \ˌsəb-ˈhyü-mən, -ˈyü-\

: not having or showing the level of kindness, intelligence, etc., that is expected of normal human beings

: not suitable for human beings
Full Definition of SUBHUMAN
: less than human: as
a : failing to attain the level (as of morality or intelligence) associated with normal human beings
b : unsuitable to or unfit for human beings <subhuman living conditions>
c : of or relating to a taxonomic group lower than that of humans <the subhuman primates>

Oh look, the same logical fallacy of trying to imply the general by using the particular.

I do not think it is ever okay to refer to your girl friend as a slut.

Let her call herself that if she wishes to be LESS THAN HUMAN.

You see, if butters had said that originally, then I would not have called her out as a liar; but she decided to up the seriousness of the charge (in order to protect a racist) to language which she knew was more inflammatory.

liar
familar as i am with words, i immediately saw from both your choice of words and the context in which you posted them that 'sub-human' was your implied meaning.

you called me a liar because:
a) i cross-post with rob here
b) i disagreed with you on the brown shooting and climate threads
c) i stated that calling me racist for posting with rob, whilst you were happily posting with jbj and bunny in the shooting thread, was hypocritical, especially given your post some years back about haitians being 'sub-human'.
d) you never thought i'd find the evidence. in short, you underestimated me. liar

The issue in question is not whether or not he is a racist, it's whether or not he is a liar.

in a nutshell. and he is, and continues to attempt to twist and wriggle out of his weasel words.

Your constant references to Byron are starting to get a little creepy.

it's a disgusting use of a man's name who is unable to agree or disagree with him. it is used in an agenda, just like a sly politician.

LOL! They say that a person lives on in the memories of others, so maybe AJ is helping Byron live on?

you are more generous than i in this, noor i'm seeing him use byron's name time and time again purely to bolster some statement of his - not in any genuinely affectionate, compassionate, or altruistic fashion. and whilst i've chosen to ignore these instances, i do object to his sly attempts at emotional manipulation.

Well, that might be the case, but I for one doubt it. I look at it as a crude appeal to emotion, just like the other times he has invoked Byron's name to garner sympathy for his cause du jour.

yes

Unless there was a previously-unknown and intimate friendship between the two, we all (present company excepted) "knew" Byron, yet Gump is the only one to constantly reference Byron, which he uses to legitimize what he's posting.

The fact that he's the ONLY one doing this is the creepy part. That is to say, he's not helping Byron live on so much as he's using the memory of Byron to further his agenda.

yes

those of us who were his actual friends don't go using his name and memory like this. it's base.
noor's reminiscing and others' fond remembrances are of quite a different nature: they are without guile and agenda-less.

 

[Lancecastor]

Q: Who spends 19 pages arguing about the definition of "human"?

A: Losers.

 

[dolf]

Q: Who spends 19 pages arguing about the definition of "human"?

A: Losers.

we've progressed to boobs now.

 

[butters]

we've progressed to boobs now.

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

So...what's the real issue because this is a lot of hullabaloo about nothing?

 

[IrezumiKiss]

there can be no disagreement, despite his vociferous lies claiming he never said it or any such thing.

merriam-webster:



liar
familar as i am with words, i immediately saw from both your choice of words and the context in which you posted them that 'sub-human' was your implied meaning.

you called me a liar because:
a) i cross-post with rob here
b) i disagreed with you on the brown shooting and climate threads
c) i stated that calling me racist for posting with rob, whilst you were happily posting with jbj and bunny in the shooting thread, was hypocritical, especially given your post some years back about haitians being 'sub-human'.
d) you never thought i'd find the evidence. in short, you underestimated me. liar


in a nutshell. and he is, and continues to attempt to twist and wriggle out of his weasel words.

it's a disgusting use of a man's name who is unable to agree or disagree with him. it is used in an agenda, just like a sly politician.

you are more generous than i in this, noor i'm seeing him use byron's name time and time again purely to bolster some statement of his - not in any genuinely affectionate, compassionate, or altruistic fashion. and whilst i've chosen to ignore these instances, i do object to his sly attempts at emotional manipulation.


yes


yes

those of us who were his actual friends don't go using his name and memory like this. it's base.
noor's reminiscing and others' fond remembrances are of quite a different nature: they are without guile and agenda-less.

Said it before and I'll say it again.

Thank you SO very much for this thread.

Sometimes, in order to restore balance to the universe, a perpetually froggy and yappy motherfucker who thinks his britches are beyond his bullshit needs to be slapped with the palm of verity and taken down a few rungs on his rickety ladder. That time came. And it came good.

http://www.imgnook.com/b3D6eo.gif

 

[Sean]

The most surprising thing for me is that there were people on Lit that DIDN'T KNOW AJ was a scumbag.

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

The most surprising thing for me is that there were people on Lit that DIDN'T KNOW AJ was a scumbag.

But so are you so we have to pick and choose now?

 

[dolf]

cowboys in black hats & cowboys in white.

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

gideeup.

 

[butters]

So...what's the real issue because this is a lot of hullabaloo about nothing?

bewbs


nazi bewbs

 

[butters]

cowboys in black hats & cowboys in white.

i always preferred the horses

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

bewbs


nazi bewbs

I'll interpret that to mean "shit stirring" but that's no closer to the truth than Forrest ate your homework.

 

[dolf]

i always preferred the horses

eeeeeeeeeeew! dirty bitch!

 

[islandman]

I believe she means "cowboys hung like horses".

 

[butters]

I'll interpret that to mean "shit stirring" but that's no closer to the truth than Forrest ate your homework.

for the umpteenth time, this has one purpose and one purpose only - which is to show he lied when he claimed to have never said they were sub-human or anything remotely like that. he called me a liar for saying he had. i proved he had said it and i was no liar. simple as that.

you called me a liar because:
a) i cross-post with rob here
b) i disagreed with you on the brown shooting and climate threads
c) i stated that calling me racist for posting with rob, whilst you were happily posting with jbj and bunny in the shooting thread, was hypocritical, especially given your post some years back about haitians being 'sub-human'.
d) you never thought i'd find the evidence. in short, you underestimated me. liar

or
nazi bewbs

 

[dolf]

aaaaaaah! dirty bitch!

 

[islandman]

That Harry is a lucky man. Other than the obvious reasons, can you imagine how hot angry sex with butters would be?

I shudder at the thought.

The good kind of shudder.

 

[butters]

eeeeeeeeeeew! dirty bitch!

getcher mind up out tha dung, bitch

I believe she means "cowboys hung like horses".

welllllllllllll.... that's a horse of a different colour
lippizaners

 

[butters]

That Harry is a lucky man. Other than the obvious reasons, can you imagine how hot angry sex with butters would be?

I shudder at the thought.

The good kind of shudder.

bless you for qualifying that

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

for the umpteenth time, this has one purpose and one purpose only - which is to show he lied when he claimed to have never said they were sub-human or anything remotely like that. he called me a liar for saying he had. i proved he had said it and i was no liar. simple as that.



or
nazi bewbs

So, you proved your point at what cost?