Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
On the plus side, they're not zombies.
I never gave much thought to the fact that they're no longer alive. I did feel uncomfortable seeing a new Philip Seymour Hoffman movie a few weeks ago though - his death was too recent.
P.S. Everybody has a crush on Audrey Hepburn. It should be the new Turing test.
Yes ,but they could act .A lot of the olde time male actors were real dogfaces.
Yes ,but they could act .
And the women did not look like survivors from a concentration camp .
all those talented hot people are like super dead and shit and that fucking blows. also, it makes perving on them like actually perverted and that's double plus ungood, yo. still, it's something to do.
A lot of the olde time male actors were real dogfaces.
I was just having a discussion about old movie actors vs modern ones. The difference was that they could act, and they did a lot of different roles.
If you ask me, the difference I see is that you no longer have stars- people with real charisma and appeal that goes beyond just looks or great acting. Everyone, these days, is so forgettable. They burn really bright for a nanosecond and then fade into oblivion. It's the same with Bollywood too.
they did the same back in the day as well. the catalyst for this thread was raquel torres who was basically a blip who is only remembered these days for being in duck soup and duck soup is not remembered because of her at all. still, she was a star in her day and then she wasn't.
anyway, i think the big difference is at the time they were just the only game in town. no tv, radio was very, very limited (and actually came later then film in most places at least) so movie stars really were something special. now any old hot girl can get herself in movies and maybe a shitty tv show and probably even take a stab at singing shitty pop music before fading into nothing once she's no longer hot enough to be interesting.
same for the dudes just minus the shitty music. well, mostly.
That is most likely the case. Because it was rarer, it was a bigger deal. Also those massive cut-outs helped them appear as being a cut above us mere mortals.
But beyond that there is still something missing in the actors today. Maybe it had something to do with all that butterpaper used to create those warm fuzzy shots that gave them a more dreamlike quality.
I've thought about how weird it is seeing an old movie, or photograph, or painting, and finding someone attractive and then realising they've been dead since before you were born. It does make it creepy.
Also, I've never had a crush on Audrey Hepburn and am now concerned I might be a robot.
But I absolutely agree that pretty, cute, and hot are different things.
Now, as for the waxing rhapsodic about Old Hollywood portion of this thread,
Counterpoint:
Old movies are overrated. The "Golden Age of Hollywood" is a triumph of style over substance.
robot or monster. flip for it.
I've thought about how weird it is seeing an old movie, or photograph, or painting, and finding someone attractive and then realising they've been dead since before you were born. It does make it creepy.
Also, I've never had a crush on Audrey Hepburn and am now concerned I might be a robot.
But I absolutely agree that pretty, cute, and hot are different things.
Now, as for the waxing rhapsodic about Old Hollywood portion of this thread,
Counterpoint:
Old movies are overrated. The "Golden Age of Hollywood" is a triumph of style over substance.
Monster, apparently.
I'm relatively okay with this.