New Witness to Michael Brown Shooting

Liberals need to face up how they have exacerbated racial division over the decades. Aside from the Irish, they are the world's biggest modern day racists.


#1 Racist country in the world?

USA.



Swedish economists often do a World Values Survey, which measures global opinions and attitudes. One of the questions is, “What kind of person would you not want as a neighbor?” and if respondents choose “people of a different race” from the list, well, they make the “racist” list. Using the results of the survey and independent research, we’ve compiled a comprehensive list of the top 10 most racist countries in the world.

http://mixtopten.com/top-10-racist-countries-in-the-world/
 
A picture is worth a thousand words. If that's actually Brown, provably, it goes a long way toward explaining what happened. Explaining it well enough, anyway.

What a stupid statement.

He wasn't armed when he was shot.

#ScaryBlackMan
 
What a stupid statement.

He wasn't armed when he was shot.

#ScaryBlackMan

You can call it stupid all you want. According to the cop, from what has been rumored, he tried to be armed. But keep your head buried in the sand. It's fine with me.
 
What a stupid statement.

He wasn't armed when he was shot.

#ScaryBlackMan

if a PICTURE isn't worth a THOUSAND WORDS

why was THUG TREYVON pictured as a 13 yr old ALL the time and why is DRUG INFUSED HULKING THUG picture as a young kid?

why? we know why!

#DerangedDegenerate
 
Wow, I agree with you Lance. Since 2009, the USA has slid into a racial divide like nothing I've ever experienced.

What I don't agree with, if your constant American bashing. In the words of Dick Cheney... "go f*** yourself."

I read your tripe and think similar thoughts.
 
You can call it stupid all you want. According to the cop, from what has been rumored, he tried to be armed. But keep your head buried in the sand. It's fine with me.

Well, by all means, continue to insist that the #ScaryBlackMan deserved six bullets, even though he wasn't armed, because of a Facebook picture he once posted.

Don't be surprised, though, if you don't gain many converts to your #FearEverything religion.

You made a stupid comment.

LOL... that's where I keep him buried.

You keep me on ignore because deep down you cannot compete in the arena of ideas with me. You hide in the ignore bunker like the spineless nancy boy you are.
 
Well, by all means, continue to insist that the #ScaryBlackMan deserved six bullets, even though he wasn't armed, because of a Facebook picture he once posted.

Don't be surprised, though, if you don't gain many converts to your #FearEverything religion.

You made a stupid comment.



You keep me on ignore because deep down you cannot compete in the arena of ideas with me. You hide in the ignore bunker like the spineless nancy boy you are.

I don't think it was a stupid comment. I think your reaction to it is stupid, instead. Really stupid.
 
A picture is worth a thousand words. If that's actually Brown, provably, it goes a long way toward explaining what happened. Explaining it well enough, anyway.
So if a cop shot and killed this person you'd make a judgement based on her facebook photo that it explains why she was shot?

I notice that at least Brown seems to know better how to hold a weapon when you're not ready to fire.
 
Last edited:
Actually I am a concerned citizen. Something's not right here. No, many things are not right here. Normally when something like this happens one or more officers from the Ferguson Police Department, in this case, would be assigned to do an investigation at the scene, which would include talking to the officer who did the shooting, to get his version of what went down. A scene investigation would also be done, involving photos, measurements, etc. To make it brief, within 24 hours an incident report would normally be written by the investigating officer or officers, and submitted for approval by a superior within the department. On approval, sometimes right away, but usually within 48 hours or maybe 72, the report is officially filed and made available to the public. That was not done in this case, apparently. That is strange, to put it mildly. And cause for concern, I might add. And I see no reason to accept an excuse like the investigation was suddenly turned over to somebody else, so the department washed its hands of it. If so, where is that department's incident report?

The crime scene investigation was conducted by the North St. Louis PD. CNN had an extensive interview yesterday with one of the brass from their department, talking about both their own shooting and the Ferguson shooting. It was a good interview (now that the furor is settling down a bit and the media doesn't have the easy story of demonstrations, some actual journalism is happening). Being a small department, Ferguson has a para-mutual agreement with N. St. Louis to provide them assistance when needed. N. St. Louis apparently has a much more extensive forensics and crime scene processing unit and has para-mutual agreements with the surrounding suburbs.

Contrary to media stories of Mr. Brown being left uncovered in the street for four hours the crime scene technicians arrived in about thirty minutes, covered Mr. Brown with a sterile blanket (so as not to transfer any evidence into the scene), and then erected a privacy shield around him. They (the crime scene technicians) spent the next four or five hours processing the scene with detectives from Ferguson and North St. Louis. When the initial riot broke out, officers and equipment from multiple jurisdictions responded (that is why if you watch the videos you saw/see the wide variety of uniforms and equipment).

Just sharing for those who like a little information.

Out of curiosity does anyone know how many police involved shootings Ferguson has in a year? (I don't, and I've not seen any mentioned in the media, so I suspect it is a pretty rare event.)
 
Back
Top