4est_4est_Gump
Run Forrest! RUN!
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2011
- Posts
- 89,007
Most news people clearly want this to be a case where the cop is guilty of an unjustified killing. Nobody can deny that with a straight face.
Then why did you doubt that anyone had said he was shot in the back when it was all over the news on day one and two???
The press did not even try to get a second confirmation of the "facts," they ran with the story and thus started affecting the memories of all subsequent witness accounts and well as poisoning the national jury pool for when Eric Holder tries the cop on a civil rights violation for not being brave enough to die in the line of duty.
And by subsequent, I mean even the one you found so highly credible that it was going to turn this case to the side of the Press's story.