Mr. Speaker! We Need To Get Back To Benghazi

[unregistered]

 

[islandman]

Yellow bellied Alt, too cowardly to use his real username...Iggy.

I see you didn't address the point of the cartoon.

I can only assume you agree with its display of hypocrisy.

 

[Bad_Doggie]

I see you didn't address the point of the cartoon.

I can only assume you agree with its display of hypocrisy.

It's very selective outrage!

http://i.imgur.com/VB1fnb4.jpg​

Yawn...
http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BD0vf_dCQAAmqC3.jpg

As an aside, I wonder how many gooks these guys killed in 'Nam?

Woof!

 

[islandman]

We want to know that we have a CinC 24/7.

Part-time U.S. citizens need not care about such things.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

We want to know that we have a CinC 24/7.

Ok. So he was reelected and he is what he is and he can't run again. Another election in '16 and vote for someone who campaigns on a GPS implant platform I suppose..

I still don't get what the issue is with Benghazi. What more is there to know? You want someone fired?

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[islandman]

Actually class clown, it's apples and oranges...as usual.

We aren't talking about Bush'd ability to kill people in defense of the nation. We're talking about Obama's failure to do so in defense of national security and his countrymen on the anniversary of 9-11. We're talking about him being AWOL while we were under attack. We're talking about him lying to the American people to get himself and his party re-elected and hiding the evidence. We're talking about him defying the American people by failing to comply with duly executed subpoenas by their congressional representatives. We're talking about a demonstrably corrupt man failing in his duty as President of the United States.

And all of this is but one man's opinion.

And yet he expects the entire nation to sit up and pay attention.

Unfuckingbelievable....

 

[dan_c00000]

it's about dereliction of duty and it's consequences.

Just like when Bush had Powell lie to the U.N. or that doesn't count?

 

[RjThoughts]

Just like when Bush had Powell lie to the U.N. or that doesn't count?

Of course it doesn't count, since Bush was a White Christian and Obama is a Black Muslim Socialist for Kenya

 

[Bry1313]

Just like when Bush had Powell lie to the U.N. or that doesn't count?

It's one thing to lie to UN when advocating a war that will CST $1 trillion and 10,000 American lives. It's another thing altogether to go to Sunday talk shows and tell an incomplete story. I think we all know the 2nd one is much worse.

 

[dan_c00000]

Of course it doesn't count, since Bush was a White Christian and Obama is a Black Muslim Socialist for Kenya

All true but Powell was a black Republican! You know until he said he was endorsing Obama.

 

[Bry1313]

Actually class clown, it's apples and oranges...as usual.

We aren't talking about Bush'd ability to kill people in defense of the nation. We're talking about Obama's failure to do so in defense of national security and his countrymen on the anniversary of 9-11. We're talking about him being AWOL while we were under attack. We're talking about him lying to the American people to get himself and his party re-elected and hiding the evidence. We're talking about him defying the American people by failing to comply with duly executed subpoenas by their congressional representatives. We're talking about a demonstrably corrupt man failing in his duty as President of the United States.

So those 32 people killed at American embassies were served by the previous administration and all questions have been answered on all Sunday talk shows?

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Actually class clown, it's apples and oranges...as usual.

We aren't talking about Bush'd ability to kill people in defense of the nation. We're talking about Obama's failure to do so in defense of national security and his countrymen on the anniversary of 9-11. We're talking about him being AWOL while we were under attack. We're talking about him lying to the American people to get himself and his party re-elected and hiding the evidence. We're talking about him defying the American people by failing to comply with duly executed subpoenas by their congressional representatives. We're talking about a demonstrably corrupt man failing in his duty as President of the United States.

it's about dereliction of duty and it's consequences.

The Benghazi Ambassador was offered additional security a month before the attack, he declined. In hindsight I suppose they could have been sent anyway, but that's the benefit of hindsight.

The President wasn't AWOL, he was in the Oval Office receiving intelligence briefings at the time of the attack o Benghazi. You're aware that the President doesn't need to be in the Situation Room to receive intelligence reports right? You fuckers sure as hell thought that when old W. was permanently (or so it seemed) on vacation in Crawford.

The rest is just more of the same old bull-shit opinion.

 

[Bry1313]

The Democrats were free to pursue it when the rabid bat Pelosi was the Speaker, she chose not to. Ask her why.

Because not even Pelosi is crass enough to exploit a situation like this?

 

[Bad_Doggie]

Actually class clown, it's apples and oranges...as usual.

We aren't talking about Bush'd ability to kill people in defense of the nation.

Defence of what? When did Iraq attack the US or even pose a credible threat? Or have any involvement in 9/11 for that matter?

The issue isn’t how many Iraq’s were killed it’s how many US personal have been killed for a dubious, I’ll planned geo-political adventure based solely on unsubstantiated and/or fabricated evidence.

The point was that since the beginning of the 20th century there has been numerous deadly attacks against US oversea facilities under both red and blue presidencies and yet no outrage, why?

We're talking about Obama's failure to do so in defense of national security and his countrymen on the anniversary of 9-11.

You manage to megaphone your hypocrisy even more; of course Obama is personally responsible for the attack and yet when it came to the capture of OBL you give him no credit at all. Nor all the other terrorist which have been killed under his administration.

But, then he's a terrorist, right?

We're talking about him being AWOL while we were under attack. We're talking about him lying to the American people to get himself and his party re-elected and hiding the evidence. We're talking about him defying the American people by failing to comply with duly executed subpoenas by their congressional representatives. We're talking about a demonstrably corrupt man failing in his duty as President of the United States.

http://i153.photobucket.com/albums/s232/Bad_Doggie/LaughingDog.gif

Sorry, but, fuck!

There cannot be any better example of a failure of an administration to protect the American people than 9/11. They had been warned for over 6 months prior to the attack by the British, French, German and Italian governments that there was an attack planned on US soil and yet they failed miserably to hinder the attack in anyway.

Funny I never once remember you calling for impeachment or anything else, hypocrite clown.

Woof!

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[Busybody]

The Benghazi Ambassador was offered additional security a month before the attack, he declined. In hindsight I suppose they could have been sent anyway, but that's the benefit of hindsight.

The President wasn't AWOL, he was in the Oval Office receiving intelligence briefings at the time of the attack o Benghazi. You're aware that the President doesn't need to be in the Situation Room to receive intelligence reports right? You fuckers sure as hell thought that when old W. was permanently (or so it seemed) on vacation in Crawford.

The rest is just more of the same old bull-shit opinion.

you fucking NIGGER

you made this ALL UP

none of it is TRUE!

NONE

ASSHOLE

 

[unregistered]

 

[Bry1313]

You cowards are all the same, blame Bush for 9-11 instead of al Qaeda.

That's cuz you're a dumb shit head who doesn't pay attention. I called for his impeachment, for not enforcing the law on the border.

You are blaming Obama and not Al Qaeda for Benghazi.

 

[Bry1313]

The offers no doubt frustrated by an understanding within the State Department that no additional security would be provided. In fact the consulate was informed through back channels not to make direct request for additional security. The alleged conversation between Hamm and the Ambassador was not testified to in front of any congressional hearing nor were they discussed in the State Department’s Administrative Review Board investigation or any reports made public. In addition the 18 member special forces security force authorized by General Hamm was declined by the State Department and turned around while on the tarmac in Tripoli.



You have no clue where Obama was in the White House or what he was receiving or not receiving, and to date neither does anyone outside the White House, so shut up about it.

If Bush was in office it wouldn't have happened, and if it did, those responsible would be dead long before now.

People did attack embassies while Bush was in office, way more often than they have under Obama.

And yeah, the Bush admin really hunted down the terrorists well. When he got a Bin Laden........oh.

 

[marie_julie_200]

Yellow bellied Alt, too cowardly to use his real username...Iggy.

What is this supposed to mean? I'm not an alt. I found this somewhat-relevant cartoon and posted it.