Mr. Speaker! We Need To Get Back To Benghazi

I'd definitely like facts and figures on this, and we don't have a jobless economy.

You could start with the thousands of coal related people laid off, all the way down to the guitar company that was harrassed for having some rare protected wood they used to build guitars, along with starving farmers of water because of an endangered minnow.
 
They've just about finished off the coal fired energy plants. I fear natural gas production will be next.

Well the coal fired energy plants are doing just fine and your fears are complete bullshit. You've more to fear from Britain reestablishing control over the us colonials than that.

They know the private American economy depends on cheap energy. They intend to take down the free enterprise system and the civil society along with it. They are enthralled with erecting the Hobbesian Leviathan.

Then the Private American Economy must evolve and soon or die. It won't be anything but scarcity of energy that kills us if we continue depending on cheap energy for our prosperity. Those days will soon be behind us and every sane person knows it.
 
DanCooooooch has been a massive fail since his first post.

http://maxpics.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/attacks-bush_deaths-at-embassy-consulates_list.jpg


The GOP's Benghazi Committee Chairman Seems Unfamiliar With What Happened on the Day of the Attack

By Brian Beutler  @brianbeutler


It's easy to imagine how someone who wasn't paying close attention to the news on September 11, 2012 might still be unaware that a bunch of stuff was happening in the Middle East outside of Benghazi that day. But the designated chairman of the inchoate House Select Committee on Benghazi shouldn't be one of those people.

And yet here's Trey Gowdy, gabbing away on MSNBC this morning:

"Well, how many people were harmed in the Middle East in that time period? The second goal or third goal of Ben Rhodes' memo was to bring countries to justice for harming our citizens. What other country could they be talking about? I mean what else was being discussed after September 11, 2012 other than Benghazi?"

Taking those questions in order: Many (assuming you count non-Americans as people); Egypt and Yemen, among others; and, outside right wing fever swamps, a lot.

The hosts of every morning news show Susan Rice visited the following Sunday made explicit references to and asked questions about both Benghazi and broader unrest in the Middle East. Administration officials including Rhodes prepped Rice to answer a whole range of questions, because there was more happening in the world that week than an attack in Benghazi alone.

Republicans claim a single, previously undisclosed email from Rhodes recatalyzed their Benghazi obsession, and so they're understandably at pains to dispute the White House's contention that officials withheld the email because it referred to a variety of crises, not just Benghazi. Gowdy focuses on the third bullet point in that email, which references "people who harm Americans," because the first bullet point—"the United States is doing everything that we can to protect our people and facilities abroad"—and the second bullet point—"these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy"—completely undermine his argument that the White House was single-mindedly obsessed with spinning away the attack in Libya.

But Benghazi has become such a totem on the right, that it's actually difficult to say where Gowdy's cynicism ends and self-deception begins. September 11, 2012 is Benghazi Day on the American right; its obsession with the attacks there has crowded all other events out of the history of that week, creating a widespread impression that nothing worth mentioning was happening anywhere else in the world. But senior Republican politicians are supposed to know the full score. And it's frightening how likely it is that the chairman of the Benghazi committee isn't intentionally misleading here, but has actually written the non-Benghazi events of September 11, 2012 and the days thereafter out of existence in his mind.
 
sorta kinda funny

how

Serengeti Soetoro made a BIGGER deal of ONE botched KILLING of a KILLER then the WANTON KILLINGS of 4 US SERVICE PERSONEL:cool:
 
And the 40 plus percent of American energy production using coal for fuel, and the effects of its absence on the price of remaining energy alternatives.

I don't suppose you can go in to detail on that?

You could start with the thousands of coal related people laid off, all the way down to the guitar company that was harrassed for having some rare protected wood they used to build guitars, along with starving farmers of water because of an endangered minnow.


No, we need actual numbers and actual cause and effect. If Natural Gas is kicking the shit out of coal the job losses aren't generated by the EPA for example. The guitar company using illegal wood? If the world was sane they would have been sent to jail. Those are jobs that I'm proud to say we eliminated. Just as I'll be proud when we completely stop hunting elephants for ivory and China stops finnin sharks.

Those farmers aren't starving because of an endangered fish. That's just a bullshit lie. Not from you though the MSM is in on it.
 
screaming about CIVIL RIGHTS investigation vs G Zimmerman is OK

DEAD AMERICANS IN LIB> YEAH! is

Ho HUM
 
Since the oil and gas companies are reaping BILLIONS of dollars in profits as well as receiving corporate welfare, I don't see them bringing in new jobs, even with their lip service of "We're looking into renewable energy sources."

Green energy would be more profitable IF the obstructionist Congress - BOTH sides of the aisles - stopped bending over for ExxonMobile, BP, Sheel, etc!

Anecdote: Upstate NY has been trying to upgrade Nanotechnology - both education and manufacturing - both there is a dearth of qualified American teachers AND employees. Why? Because STEM is a dirty word with the GOP, yes, educating the youth would expose them the as bullshitting politicians they are.

If and when green energy is profitable, the venture capitalists will jump all over it.

Untill then, N gas and oil are the name of the game and could make this nation a powerhouse, providing jobs as it goes.... who cares if Exxon is making billions if they're providing millions with jobs.
 
Since the oil and gas companies are reaping BILLIONS of dollars in profits as well as receiving corporate welfare, I don't see them bringing in new jobs, even with their lip service of "We're looking into renewable energy sources."

Green energy would be more profitable IF the obstructionist Congress - BOTH sides of the aisles - stopped bending over for ExxonMobile, BP, Sheel, etc!

Anecdote: Upstate NY has been trying to upgrade Nanotechnology - both education and manufacturing - both there is a dearth of qualified American teachers AND employees. Why? Because STEM is a dirty word with the GOP, yes, educating the youth would expose them the as bullshitting politicians they are.

STFU, Degenerate PROOF READER with this BS
 
If and when green energy is profitable, the venture capitalists will jump all over it.

Untill then, N gas and oil are the name of the game and could make this nation a powerhouse, providing jobs as it goes.... who cares if Exxon is making billions if they're providing millions with jobs.

By the time it's profitable we may have our backs up against a major wall. Ask yourself what if 2008 hadn't been the speculators driving the price up and had instead been peak oil. Where exactly do you think the economy would be today if gas prices were between five and six dollars and had been continuously for the last six years?

There is no until then, plan ahead or get left behind.
 
If and when green energy is profitable, the venture capitalists will jump all over it.

Untill then, N gas and oil are the name of the game and could make this nation a powerhouse, providing jobs as it goes.... who cares if Exxon is making billions if they're providing millions with jobs.

And receiving corporate welfare, you missed that entirely, as usual
 
I don't suppose you can go in to detail on that?




No, we need actual numbers and actual cause and effect. If Natural Gas is kicking the shit out of coal the job losses aren't generated by the EPA for example. The guitar company using illegal wood? If the world was sane they would have been sent to jail. Those are jobs that I'm proud to say we eliminated. Just as I'll be proud when we completely stop hunting elephants for ivory and China stops finnin sharks.

Those farmers aren't starving because of an endangered fish. That's just a bullshit lie. Not from you though the MSM is in on it.

I don't have actual numbers.

We need private sector jobs and a big push on non green energy production will help. Keep in mind all the jobs that are created as a result of big corporations....sub contracters etc.
 
You could start with the thousands of coal related people laid off, all the way down to the guitar company that was harrassed for having some rare protected wood they used to build guitars, along with starving farmers of water because of an endangered minnow.

I agree.

I'm pissed that the government won't let me break the law and grow pounds of pot in my backyard.
 
I don't have actual numbers.

We need private sector jobs and a big push on non green energy production will help. Keep in mind all the jobs that are created as a result of big corporations....sub contracters etc.

Then at best your claim is heresay.

And there is nothing magical about non-green energy that would produce more jobs than a push for green energy and a good reason to believe it would produce less since the players for those industries are already entrenched.

Your secondary point would apply just as well to green jobs, except more so especially when talking about start ups and small companies because new systems would need to be built from the ground up.
 
so lets see if I get THIS right

in 2012, we were told Romney was responsible for the CANCER DEATH of a woman that was laid off by a company that was owned by Bain.....LONG AFTER BAIN SOLD TEH COMPANY....LONG AFTER ROMENY LEFT BAIN

But HE WAS RESPONSIBLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



But Serengeti Soetoro ISNT responsible fro Benghazi:rolleyes:

(btw, the LEADING $ donator to the NIGGER in 2012 was Bain)

I gotta hand it to DUMZ LIBZ......they just DONT GIVE a SHIT....they lie, deceive, deflect...and just BULLSHIT and 53% believe :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top