Mr. Speaker! We Need To Get Back To Benghazi

[phrodeau]

Not accurate in regard to funding. They probably didn't secure the outpost because it would have drawn attention to the dire security situation in Benghazi when Obama was saying bin Laden's demise had mostly quelled terrorism.

So Obama, Rice, and Hillary concocted the fairy tale about a precipitating video. And they lied on as many TV shows as would have them.

The other sad thing is that the once-august NY Times, once deemed to be scribbling the first draft of history, is now reduced to spindoctoring for Obama and Hillary.

Somehow I missed this big news item. When exactly did Obama say that terrorism was quelled?

 

[Sean Renaud]

Somehow I missed this big news item. When exactly did Obama say that terrorism was quelled?

He said Al Qaeda was on the run and I suppose it's possible that he thought the average American was stupid enough to think Al Qaeda=all terrorism ever. It's possible. I assumed he was using it as a qualifer or sorts for drawing down in Afghanistan but maybe I was wrong.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Somehow I missed this big news item. When exactly did Obama say that terrorism was quelled?

Must've been during his announcement of the Quarter Quell.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-IqcrO55Wv78/UeWC8dRsz2I/AAAAAAAAAq4/waLs-qWEqbA/s1600/tumblr_mq1ho13Zox1rj87yco2_1280.png

 

[phrodeau]

Not accurate in regard to funding. They probably didn't secure the outpost because it would have drawn attention to the dire security situation in Benghazi when Obama was saying bin Laden's demise had mostly quelled terrorism.

So Obama, Rice, and Hillary concocted the fairy tale about a precipitating video. And they lied on as many TV shows as would have them.

The other sad thing is that the once-august NY Times, once deemed to be scribbling the first draft of history, is now reduced to spindoctoring for Obama and Hillary.

So is there anything at all truthful or even likely to be truthful in this post of landslider's? I don't see a single thing.

 

[CuriousCoot]

Yawn...
http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BD0vf_dCQAAmqC3.jpg

As an aside, I wonder how many gooks these guys killed in 'Nam?

Not nearly enough.

 

[RobDownSouth]

So is there anything at all truthful or even likely to be truthful in this post of landslider's? I don't see a single thing.

Nope, and Landslider obviously didn't read the article, either. Of course, Landslider has a documented history of passive-aggressively ignoring things that don't fit his preconceived worldview.

He's internalized the whole "Benghazi talking points" narrative, and no longer needs...or wants...any factual corroboration. That's why he can natter on about the video.

 

[1sickbastard]

Ah, facts.
The bane of ideology.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Ah, facts.
The bane of ideology.

I get the impression just saying the word "facts" makes Landslider break out in a rash.

He's morphing into the 2014 version of the late unlamented Garbage Can (Lit's original "True Believer")

 

[CuriousCoot]

Future Comedy? Strange sense of humor you got there.

The fact of the matter is we have the first BLACK president. From the day he was elected several things were foretold by yours truely.

1. He will NEVER be blamed for anything.... because he's black.
2. He will be re-elected to a second term regardless how poorly he does... because he's black.
3. He will get a pass from the media for everything that white presidents have been crucified for.... because he's black.
4. He will be remembered most for being the first BLACK president more than anything else he might accomplish.

So please, just give this shit up. Birthers, Muck Rakers, Yellow journalism.... Nothing is gonna touch this guy and that is EXACTLY why a complete unknown first term Senator was CHOSEN by the liberal power structure to be this president. So they could push ANY agenda they wanted with the knowledge that all they had to say "It's cause he's black isn't it?" to shut the opposition up.

If you can't see that in retrospect then you are just blind. I saw the handwriting on the wall and damned if I wasn't right again!

 

[RobDownSouth]

Future Comedy? Strange sense of humor you got there.

The fact of the matter is we have the first BLACK president. From the day he was elected several things were foretold by yours truely.

1. He will NEVER be blamed for anything.... because he's black.
2. He will be re-elected to a second term regardless how poorly he does... because he's black.
3. He will get a pass from the media for everything that white presidents have been crucified for.... because he's black.
4. He will be remembered most for being the first BLACK president more than anything else he might accomplish.

So please, just give this shit up. Birthers, Muck Rakers, Yellow journalism.... Nothing is gonna touch this guy and that is EXACTLY why a complete unknown first term Senator was CHOSEN by the liberal power structure to be this president. So they could push ANY agenda they wanted with the knowledge that all they had to say "It's cause he's black isn't it?" to shut the opposition up.

If you can't see that in retrospect then you are just blind. I saw the handwriting on the wall and damned if I wasn't right again!

Welcome to Lit, "True Believer".

Please observe the dress code for True Believers at all times: Tinfoil hats MUST have earflaps in the Northern Hemisphere during winter months. On New Years Eve ONLY, tinfoil party hats may be substituted. Murican flag pins must be worn on your body at all times (including pajamas).

 

[phrodeau]

Future Comedy? Strange sense of humor you got there.

The fact of the matter is we have the first BLACK president. From the day he was elected several things were foretold by yours truely.

1. He will NEVER be blamed for anything.... because he's black.
2. He will be re-elected to a second term regardless how poorly he does... because he's black.
3. He will get a pass from the media for everything that white presidents have been crucified for.... because he's black.
4. He will be remembered most for being the first BLACK president more than anything else he might accomplish.

So please, just give this shit up. Birthers, Muck Rakers, Yellow journalism.... Nothing is gonna touch this guy and that is EXACTLY why a complete unknown first term Senator was CHOSEN by the liberal power structure to be this president. So they could push ANY agenda they wanted with the knowledge that all they had to say "It's cause he's black isn't it?" to shut the opposition up.

If you can't see that in retrospect then you are just blind. I saw the handwriting on the wall and damned if I wasn't right again!

Sure, sure. And you can recycle that post after we have a woman president, or a hispanic president, or a Jewish president.

 

[landslider2000]

Whether Obama lied has nothing whatever to do with Person A versus Person B on some porn forum.

Part and parcel of Obama's reelection campaign was the argument that bin Laden's demise
had mostly quelled terrorism.

The outpost in Benghazi on fire, and the ambassador dead, interfered with that story.

So Obama, Rice, and Hillary concocted the fairy tale about a precipitating video.

And they lied on as many TV shows as would have them.

The sad thing is that the once-august NY Times, once deemed to be scribbling the first draft of history, is now reduced to spindoctoring for Obama and Hillary.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Whether Obama lied has nothing whatever to do with Person A versus Person B on some porn forum.
Part and parcel of Obama's reelection campaign was the argument that bin Laden's demise had mostly quelled terrorism. The outpost in Benghazi on fire, and the ambassador dead, interfered with that story.
So Obama, Rice, and Hillary concocted the fairy tale about a precipitating video. And they lied on as many TV shows as would have them.
The sad thing is that the once-august NY Times, once deemed to be scribbling the first draft of history, is now reduced to spindoctoring for Obama and Hillary.

^^^Too chickenshit to read the NY Times article, much less refudiate any of its points.

So instead we get a rote talking point regurgitation.

Chickenshit.

 

[landslider2000]

Attempting to drag every thread down into personal insults (which trolls would never utter in real life) isn't serious discussion.

Whether Obama lied has nothing whatever to do with Person A versus Person B on some porn forum.

Part and parcel of Obama's reelection campaign was the argument that bin Laden's demise
had mostly quelled terrorism.

The outpost in Benghazi on fire, and the ambassador dead, interfered with that story.

So Obama, Rice, and Hillary concocted the fairy tale about a precipitating video.

And they lied on as many TV shows as would have them.

The sad thing is that the once-august NY Times, once deemed to be scribbling the first draft of history, is now reduced to spindoctoring for Obama and Hillary.

 

[RobDownSouth]

I can do this all day too, chickenshit

Attempting to drag every thread down into personal insults (which trolls would never utter in real life) isn't serious discussion. Whether Obama lied has nothing whatever to do with Person A versus Person B on some porn forum.Part and parcel of Obama's reelection campaign was the argument that bin Laden's demise had mostly quelled terrorism.The outpost in Benghazi on fire, and the ambassador dead, interfered with that story.So Obama, Rice, and Hillary concocted the fairy tale about a precipitating video.And they lied on as many TV shows as would have them.The sad thing is that the once-august NY Times, once deemed to be scribbling the first draft of history, is now reduced to spindoctoring for Obama and Hillary

^^^Too chickenshit to read the NY Times article, much less refudiate any of its points.

So instead we get a rote talking point regurgitation.

Chickenshit.

 

[landslider2000]

Seeking to drag every thread down into personal insults (which trolls would never utter in real life) isn't serious discussion.

It is, rather, a confession of inability to participate in serious discussion.

Whether Obama lied has nothing whatever to do with Person A versus Person B on some porn forum.

Part and parcel of Obama's reelection campaign was the argument that bin Laden's demise
had mostly quelled terrorism.

The outpost in Benghazi on fire, and the ambassador dead, interfered with that story.

So Obama, Rice, and Hillary concocted the fairy tale about a precipitating video.

And they lied on as many TV shows as would have them.

The sad thing is that the once-august NY Times, once deemed to be scribbling the first draft of history, is now reduced to spindoctoring for Obama and Hillary.

 

[KingOrfeo]

Future Comedy? Strange sense of humor you got there.

The fact of the matter is we have the first BLACK president. From the day he was elected several things were foretold by yours truely.

1. He will NEVER be blamed for anything.... because he's black.

Well, you were wrong about that one.

 

[KingOrfeo]

So Obama, Rice, and Hillary concocted the fairy tale about a precipitating video.

And they lied on as many TV shows as would have them.

Of course, you have absolutely no way to know whether any of that is true. (Since you won't read the NYT report, which would tell you it isn't.)

 

[1sickbastard]

I get the impression just saying the word "facts" makes Landslider break out in a rash.

Introducing the new and improved D-nyl!

Bothered by troublesome facts?
Is reality making you break out in a rash?
Try D-nyl!

D-nyl is proven to smooth away disagreements with one's world view, stimulates the ability to dismiss all who don't agree wholeheartedly with stereotyped labels & impolite epithets, plus has been clinically proven to improve one's disdain of any ideology other than one's own!

So don't wait! Try new and improved D-nyl today!

 

[Bad_Doggie]

Part and parcel of Obama's reelection campaign was the argument that bin Laden's demise had mostly quelled terrorism.

You keep saying that.......it would greatly strengthen your argument if you would provide a credible link to where he said it.

Can you do that.

Thanks.

Woof!

 

[landslider2000]

Every person here read the Times piece. Suggesting otherwise is an artless attempt to drag every discussion down into the mire of insults.

All along, the scenario -- an almost unsecured outpost attacked on 9/11, with no attempt to aid defenders, and with the mess blamed on a video because it conflicted with the campaign theme that Obama acted decisively on terrorism with bin Laden -- strained credulity.

It still does.

 

[phrodeau]

(edited)

Part and parcel of Obama's reelection campaign was the argument that bin Laden's demise had mostly quelled terrorism.

(edited)

…the campaign theme that Obama acted decisively on terrorism with bin Laden...

These two things have the same meaning to you, do they?

 

[landslider2000]

Every person here read the Times piece. Suggesting otherwise is an artless attempt to drag every discussion down into the mire of insults.

This issue, like the others here, has nothing to do with Person A versus Person B on some porn forum.

All along, the scenario -- an almost unsecured outpost attacked on 9/11, with no attempt to aid defenders, and with the mess blamed on a video because it conflicted with the campaign theme that Obama acted decisively on terrorism with bin Laden -- strained credulity.

It still does.

 

[Bad_Doggie]

Every person here read the Times piece. Suggesting otherwise is an artless attempt to drag every discussion down into the mire of insults.

Firstly, perhaps you would be so kind as to quote where I “attempt to drag every discussion down into the mire of insults.”

What I asked you was a reasonable question in a civil tone. Believe me if I had intended it as an insult you would know.

So which Times piece are you referring to, this one? Because I don’t see where Obama says……

Part and parcel of Obama's reelection campaign was the argument that bin Laden's demise had mostly quelled terrorism.

Or anything like it. So where are you getting this from?

If it’s from another link then would you please post it.

Thanks

Woof!

 

[landslider2000]

Genuine discussion has nothing to do with Person A versus Person B on a porn bulletin board.

Obama's reelection campaign had a focus, inter alia, on his oversight of the killing of bin Laden and the end of the war in Iraq, with the thrust that it had the intrinsic effect of quelling terrorism.