Learning to write tender and romantic sex

[sr71plt]

Imagine how much more of this book has been misinterpreted and reinterpreted. Scary.

Even before you get to that, you have to deal with how internally contradictory the Bible is.

But that too is irrelevant to this little sidetrip the thread has taken. It takes a bend-over-backward apologist for the Bible to misinterpret the men wanting to "know" men, Lot offering his virgin daughters instead, and the men saying, "no thanks, send out the men."

As well as going off the rails, this thread has gotten a bit silly, especially since the spinoff hangs on the name "Bruce."

 

[JKendallDane]

I take it this is you not wanting to argue.

Of course the question of how many reasons were needed to destroy Sodom is irrelevant to anything on this thread.

Wanting to argue...no. Continue having a discussion, yes.

The biggest problem I am having with your point of view is that you seem satisfied taking what is told in Genesis and reading into it an interpretation that is not supported by the Ezekiel verses. How you can totally ignore a list (stated from God Himself no less) that begins with: "Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom..." and hold fast to the belief that S&G were destroyed solely because of homosexuality is beyond me.

As far as your edit addition...like you have never been involved in thread derails and detours before.

 

[sr71plt]

What I'm satisfied with is the connotation of the name "Bruce" in a story. It makes immediate connections in may readers' minds to homosexuality. (So, do want to argue about that too?)

You brought up arguing, and you don't seem to be able to stop doing it. Now you get to argue with yourself.

 

[JKendallDane]

What I'm satisfied with is the connotation of the name "Bruce" in a story. It makes immediate connections in may readers' minds to homosexuality. (So, do want to argue about that too?)

You brought up arguing, and you don't seem to be able to stop doing it. Now you get to argue with yourself.

Not at all. In fact, I think the vintage gay porn film "Leo & Lance" should have probably been named "Lance & Bruce" instead.

I'll take the other statement as chatboard shorthand for "I'm in a corner and can't find a way out of it."

 

[sr71plt]

I'll take the other statement as chatboard shorthand for "I'm in a corner and can't find a way out of it."

The "have you stopped beating your wife" approach is your way of not wanting to argue, I suppose. Goading me to argue with you.

No, I think all of your blather is because you won't admit that you were just irrelevant to any topic here an revert to an alt.

Now I guess I need to start figuring out who you were before you felt you had to change your posting name.

 

[JKendallDane]

The "have you stopped beating your wife" approach is your way of not wanting to argue, I suppose.

No, I think all of your blather is because you won't admit that you were just irrelevant to any topic here an revert to an alt.

Now I guess I need to start figuring out who you were before you felt you had to change your posting name.

Buwahahahahaha!!!

So it's the old "It has to be someone I know and is using an alt," ploy eh?

Just to satisfy your conspiracy issue, yes I have one alt going clear back to 2009, but haven't used it for submissions or posting in the forums for nearly a year and a half.

What you see now is what you get and without games. I am nothing more than just another author that enjoys learning from others and contributing something to the discussions occasionally.

 

[sr71plt]

And you love to try to goad people into arguing with you about your irrelevant postings too.

Just a fun guy.

So, how did you screw up so badly that you had to change posting names here?

 

[JKendallDane]

And you love to try to goad people into arguing with you about your irrelevant postings too.

Just a fun guy.

So, how did you screw up so badly that you had to change posting names here?

I didn't post anything irrelevant. I only added thoughts (and facts you keep ignoring) to comments already being made involving Sodom & Gommorah.

As far as "screwing up and having to change posting names"....nothing of the sort. I just decided to use the same name that I use for submissions. <shrug> Course if you want to find something nefarious in that, knock yourself out. I won't take you off my 'fav author list' unless you get truly ugly.

 

[sr71plt]

I'm old and ugly and am not vain about who favorites me or not, so do as you like.

 

[RoyceConnors]

See, now if those two above me were to look into each other's eyes deeply, kiss and have make up sex, that would be tender.