This Is Why America Is An Easy Target Of Terrorists

[Busybody]

Given the volume and frequency of your threads, Miles' threads, and Vette's threads, Obama must really be getting it right, then.

I cant speak fro others

I am on LIT

For PUSSY PICS

Everything else is a distraction


and it is IDIOTIC for the US "national security advisor" says climate change is threat, calls for emissions reductions


On many levels

Especially since the LEVELS are at multi year lows

 

[unregistered]

 

[zipman]

Given the volume and frequency of your threads, Miles' threads, and Vette's threads, Obama must really be getting it right, then.

HA! Perfect.

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[zipman]

Yep, Obama's failure so far has been perfect.

Keep goose stepping to your republican puppet masters you bifurcated and benighted, pusillanimous dunce.

 

[unregistered]

 

[IrezumiKiss]

The first thing he did this morning getting out of bed was to come online and continue the derp where he left off maybe five or six hours earlier last night.

Vette's been broken to the goose step of his own broken goose step.

 

[Scotsman69]

The Romans effectively lasted about 30 years in Scotland

and then only in the south. Check Wiki on 'Antonine Wall'. You're as ignorant about history as you are about politics. Not surprising, the two often go together.

It took you 300 years to throw out the Romans.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Sean]

Ya dumb butt fuck:

Roman Britain, referred to by the Romans as Britannia, was the part of the island of Great Britain controlled by the Roman Empire from 43 AD until c. 410.[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Britain

You don't actually know where Scotland is, do you?

 

[Scotsman69]

I may be many things, but dumb butt fuck I am not.

Its not surprising that someone as ignorant as to usurp the name 'America', for a small part of two continents, can confuse Scotland and Britain. Scotland is only part of Britain, as the USA is only part of America.

I repeat, the Roman occupation of Scotland lasted about 30 years. You reveal ignorance, but I'm not calling you names for it. Name-calling is rather juvenile.

Ya dumb butt fuck:

Roman Britain, referred to by the Romans as Britannia, was the part of the island of Great Britain controlled by the Roman Empire from 43 AD until c. 410.[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Britain

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[Scotsman69]

as we say affectionately

of an opponent in Scotland, Sean:

'The man's erse is hingin oot the windae.'

Translation: Everyone can see he's made a wee bit of a fool of himself.

Perhaps that's only to be expected of someone who doesn't know the difference between the USA and America. Which was my original point.

You don't actually know where Scotland is, do you?

 

[Scotsman69]

You simply underline your USAcentric ignorance. (I accept you're not alone in this misapprehension, but that doesn't mean you're right.) You know you're wrong, and you're flailing. You're rather like some ignorant English folk who assume the England means the UK. You are wrong, lad. Just have the human decency to put your hands up and admit it.

Only an anally technical idiot, upon hearing "America" would be thinking about any place other than the United States.

 

[Scotsman69]

So everyone from Argentina and Chile to Canada is an 'anally technical idiot'?

Only an anally technical idiot, upon hearing "America" would be thinking about any place other than the United States.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Scotsman69]

Historians accept that the effective Roman occupation of the southern third of what is now Scotland (the Romans called it Caledonia, and they sure knew where it was), was defined by the life of the Antonine Wall. Around thirty years. Check Wiki on that.

Note, I'm not calling you a dumb fuck, just suggesting your reading on the subject is rather limited. Since I live close to the line of the Antonine Wall, and have an interest in the history of my environment, please accept that on this matter I may know rather more than you do.

If we're only talking Scotland itself:

"Scotland during the Roman Empire encompasses a period of protohistory from the arrival of Roman legions in c. AD 71 to their departure in 213.."

It goes on,

"The history of the period is complex: the Roman empire influenced every part of Scotland during the period, however the occupation was neither complete nor continuous. Analysis and interpretation is further complicated by the fact that the idea of both "Scots" and of "Scotland" as a discrete entity did not emerge until centuries later."

BTW, ya dumb fuck, that's more than 30 years.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotland_during_the_Roman_Empire

 

[unregistered]

 

[Scotsman69]

South and North America are linked, whether or not you like it, and the term America encompasses both. And where precisely are Mexico and Canada?

They live in Argentina and Chile, better known as SOUTH America. Idiot.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Scotsman69]

Tuts, temper, temper. You're wrong on both counts on which you've challenged me. Go pick an ignoramus to challenge next time. Or better still, hold your counsel till you know the facts.

I was wrong once, that's because I thought I was wrong but later found out I was right. Now do fuck off. I proved you wrong three times.

 

[Sean]

I will accept that you were wrong about the 30 years.

You only know what you Google, bigot. That's why you frequently look like a total moron.

 

[unregistered]