This Is Why America Is An Easy Target Of Terrorists

[unregistered]

 

[Scotsman69]

IGGY is the last refuge of the ignorant. And those who are scared by their own ignorance.

Sorry, I cannot see it, so I must have the demented clown on IGGY.

 

[koalabear]

IGGY is the last refuge of the ignorant. And those who are scared by their own ignorance.

That explains MOTroll and slobdownsouth.

 

[Scotsman69]

Just who are those who know better?

You have demonstrated that your ignorance is startling.

Go away and hide, wee ignorant man. (Only a man could be as silly.)

Come back if you ever learn .... well, anything.

You lost on the facts, your hallucinations notwithstanding. Go ahead telll me that 213-71=30 if it builds your ego, but we know better.

 

[koalabear]

This latest group of trolls really sucks. Must be at the bottom of the barrel.

 

[Sean Renaud]

This latest group of trolls really sucks. Must be at the bottom of the barrel.

Dude they've been slaughtering you left right and center.

 

[Scotsman69]

I have answered your every point. You haven't tried to answer any of mine.

So answer this simple one. If all the good Scots, or however you described them, emigrated to the USA... why do you sing a song by one who didn't. Every New Year?

Now, is that simple enough for you vet? I wouldn't like to confuse you, I'm not mean.

You lost on the facts, your hallucinations notwithstanding. Go ahead telll me that 213-71=30 if it builds your ego, but we know better.

 

[koalabear]

Dude they've been slaughtering you left right and center.

LMAO Sure they have. Tell us how State gun laws are meaningless retard.

 

[Scotsman69]

And about your silly 'arithmetic'. Have you googled 'Antonine Wall' yet? I think I know the answer, but do give me yours. Please.

I have answered your every point. You haven't tried to answer any of mine.

So answer this simple one. If all the good Scots, or however you described them, emigrated to the USA... why do you sing a song by one who didn't. Every New Year?

Now, is that simple enough for you vet? I wouldn't like to confuse you, I'm not mean.

 

[oggbashan]

You lost on the facts, your hallucinations notwithstanding. Go ahead telll me that 213-71=30 if it builds your ego, but we know better.

There is a case for stating that the Romans NEVER occupied the greater part of the area of what is now Scotland. The areas they did occupy, even South of the Antonine Wall, were never wholly safe for Romans.

The Antonine Wall, which took 12 years to build, was only held continuously for 20 years, abandoned, and then held for a few years as the Severan Wall before being abandoned completely.

The detached forts North of the Antonine Wall were only outposts in hostile territory, not a complete occupied zone.

30 years is possibly too long for a period of Roman occupation of part of Scotland.

P.S. Hadrian's Wall, which was supposed to be the limit of the Roman Empire, for most of its occupation had extensive defences to its South, to defend from tribes supposedly within the Roman Empire. (Not the English. They arrived much later.)

 

[Scotsman69]

Perhaps you want to challenge Ogg, wee vet? I dare you. He's a much wiser and more knowledgeable man than I am.

There is a case for stating that the Romans NEVER occupied the greater part of the area of what is now Scotland. The areas they did occupy, even South of the Antonine Wall, were never wholly safe for Romans.

The Antonine Wall, which took 12 years to build, was only held continuously for 20 years, abandoned, and then held for a few years as the Severan Wall before being abandoned completely.

The detached forts North of the Antonine Wall were only outposts in hostile territory, not a complete occupied zone.

30 years is possibly too long for a period of Roman occupation of part of Scotland.

P.S. Hadrian's Wall, which was supposed to be the limit of the Roman Empire, for most of its occupation had extensive defences to its South, to defend from tribes supposedly within the Roman Empire. (Not the English. They arrived much later.)

 

[cjh]

Perhaps you want to challenge Ogg, wee vet? I dare you. He's a much wiser and more knowledgeable man than I am.

Good luck with that.

He will now pretend this thread does not exist.

 

[koalabear]

Good luck with that.

He will now pretend this thread does not exist.

Shaddup pereg.

 

[cjh]

Shaddup pereg.

Bless your little heart.

 

[koalabear]

Bless your little heart.

The Rabbi already has.

 

[cjh]

There is a case for stating that the Romans NEVER occupied the greater part of the area of what is now Scotland. The areas they did occupy, even South of the Antonine Wall, were never wholly safe for Romans.

The Antonine Wall, which took 12 years to build, was only held continuously for 20 years, abandoned, and then held for a few years as the Severan Wall before being abandoned completely.

The detached forts North of the Antonine Wall were only outposts in hostile territory, not a complete occupied zone.

30 years is possibly too long for a period of Roman occupation of part of Scotland.

P.S. Hadrian's Wall, which was supposed to be the limit of the Roman Empire, for most of its occupation had extensive defences to its South, to defend from tribes supposedly within the Roman Empire. (Not the English. They arrived much later.)

Did Vette ever address this?

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Did Vette ever address this?

No, but

BREITBART VINDICATED!!!!

or some yawn shit like that he's too busy stroking to right now.

 

[cjh]

Roman Scotland?

Even with the Antonine Wall in use, Roman occupation of what is now Scotland was never complete. Large parts of Scotland were still unoccupied and only treaties with the local tribes kept the Romans safe for a short time.

Terrorists? Any free society is vulnerable to individual terrorist acts. That is part of the price of being free.

Even totalitarian states are unable to prevent terrorism if the terrorists are prepared to die to make an impact.

Vette must have overlooked this.

 

[Squibbs]

Ah, Canada then! Why couldn't you just have said so?

And actually, my German is OK. And if the Canadians hadn't helped during WW11, and Germany had invaded Britain, they couldn't have held Scotland for long. There was no support for Naziism here, unlike England and the USA. We'd have kicked them out, as we kicked out the Romans, the English, and anyone else who has tried to invade our wee tough country.

Ahaha! Nice.

Vettebitch is a product of the American education system.

He thinks America won the war all by themselves.

Maybe in his youth he knew more, not now that the obvious alzheimers has kicked in. Kinda sad and funny at the same time...

 

[Squibbs]

Ya dumb butt fuck:

Roman Britain, referred to by the Romans as Britannia, was the part of the island of Great Britain controlled by the Roman Empire from 43 AD until c. 410.[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Britain

That's awesome!

 

[KingOrfeo]

I see the unprincipled showed up. Wonder how much of the Bill of Rights they would sign away to help Obama.

How exactly do you get from climate change to that point? Free-associating again, are we?

 

[unregistered]

 

[KingOrfeo]

It's really quite easy when you stop to think about it. That might be a problem for you however.

Well, the measures that might be necessary to combat climate change, they are not really of the "choose this or choose the Bill of Rights" order. Which is obvious when you stop to think about it.

 

[unregistered]