Oh No! Another horny teacher.

[NekoParks]

As Jane Austin would say, "such perfect condescension.”

This particular aspect of an issue that I tried to point out crosses a lot of organizations and professions is central to you in this one compartment because it has been central to your life. That, unfortunately, doesn't mean that is all-consuming in the greater realm of life--or in mine just because it's a big slice of yours. I can't put that much energy into any single issue or aspect of an issue; none of them take up that proportion of everyone's life indignities. I've found if I don't let the single issues overwhelm me I can form a better picture of how it all fits together and can protect myself from hyperventilating every time I turn around.

As Jane Austin would say, "such perfect condescension.”

Pilot, you will have to learn the difference between a discussion with varied viewpoints and a perceived attack upon you as a person. My comments were intended to bring insight and perspective to a serious issue—not to cry on anyone’s shoulder.

How can such a brilliant writer be so tone deaf regarding his comments to other people on this forum? I have not and I will not call you any names like you called another poster on this very thread. As such a clearly accomplished person, why can’t you be more polite and generous to the other people that post here? Trying to portray me as some damaged hysteric or pathetic whiner is not accurate or appropriate. I am not the one claiming to hyperventilate, which I have never experienced under even the most stressful situations. I am not the one claiming to slash my wrists over the prospect of reading a certain type of book.

In a previous reply, I said fair enough, and yet, you went back and edited in more insulting details. I am afraid that your true genius may lie in your ability to alienate such a wide variety of people on this forum.

 

[sr71plt]

I think you are seriously projecting my comments far beyond what they are. I accepted that there's sexual harrassment going on in the school systems--and also that it is a form you experience and therefore naturally it's one on your front burner. But that doesn't put it on my front burner. There's sexual harrassment going on throughout the professional landscape. I received it in my line of work in spades--to the point that I was subborned to put out in a context of physical danger or be tossed out. But I have stepped back to see the broader picture--that no one aspect of it is all-consuming nor that I will let it consume me--including needing to read "oh woe is us" books about it. Nor have I expected others to take up and wave my flags as well. I've posted no more and no less on this. That you would hyperventilate on this, I think, is a function of the obsession you have with one piece of the puzzle, which isn't adding a thing to your ability to find balance in life. It certainly isn't transferable to me.

(And I guess unfavoriting me as an author over it puts me in my place and serves me right, heh?--like any of this has anything to do with my writing. It does, however, reflect how you've let this issue take over your complete life.)

 

[sr71plt]

In a previous reply, I said fair enough, and yet, you went back and edited in more insulting details. I am afraid that your true genius may lie in your ability to alienate such a wide variety of people on this forum.

I go back and edit a lot. I always review (even after I've reviewed before posting) for technical mistakes, because I'm prone to them and my detractors are prone to throwing them in my face. Often while there, I see contextual clarity I want to try to add too. Surprisingly enough I'm often editing while others are writing. This was one of those cases.

And obviously "fair enough" isn't what you really are thinking.

I come here for erotica fun mostly. I don't come here to shoulder other people's social or political campaigns.

 

[electric1]

your ability to find balance in life. It certainly isn't transferable to me.

You're eagerly victim-blaming rape-victims, but Neko's the one who's unbalanced? I see.

 

[sr71plt]

You're eagerly victim-blaming rape-victims, but Neko's the one who's unbalanced? I see.

I'll bite. Where have I "eagerly blamed rape victims" for anything? Cite it.

Have you had your rabies shots?

 

[electric1]

Uh, like this comment here:

If I had to vote on a stereotype that held true, I think the stereotype of the horny and thinking-only-with-his dick 17-year-old boy would be near the top of the "confirmed" list.

Are you really sure you're cut out for the atmosphere of an erotica discussion site, Electric1? (Because I'm afraid you're really coming across as militantly puritanical and anal retentive.) Just sayin'.

Although it's working on the urge to go see what erotica you write and post here. I'll laugh if what you write is Incest.

 

[electric1]

Made in defense of this comment:

Sexual battery, my foot. The charge should have been 'Assault With A Friendly Weapon'.

I bet she had to drag that poor boy kicking and screaming into her web of vice to have her way with him. You just know he rode her like the last pony out of hell and thought he was in MILF heaven.

 

[sr71plt]

Made in defense of this comment:

That wasn't a comment on the act (and neither was TE999's). It was a comment on the hormonal reactions of a typical 17-year-old boy.

You seem incapable of objective reasoning.

I guess there's no suggesting you try again--as you are just too far out there in judgmental lalaland. I suggest that you're perhaps on the wrong type of forum.

 

[Boxlicker101]

I think the consensus, and I agree, is that the 17 year old boy was a beneficiary, not a victim, of the teachers horniness. That's certainly how I would have seen myself, and so would every youth of that age I have ever known.

 

[electric1]

I think the consensus, and I agree, is that the 17 year old boy was a beneficiary, not a victim, of the teachers horniness. That's certainly how I would have seen myself, and so would every youth of that age I have ever known.

You clearly haven't known many youths of that age. And I suspect your own prediction of how you would have reacted is shaped more by fantasy than by experience.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxlicker101
I think the consensus, and I agree, is that the 17 year old boy was a beneficiary, not a victim, of the teachers horniness. That's certainly how I would have seen myself, and so would every youth of that age I have ever known.

You clearly haven't known many youths of that age. And I suspect your own prediction of how you would have reacted is shaped more by fantasy than by experience.

It is shaped by fantasy, of course. I turned 17 in 1956 when I was in high school. The majority of girls back then, at least where I lived, were "saving themselves for marriage" and were not at all interested in casual sex. I would have been flustered and tongue-tied, and unsure of what I was doing but, assuming the teacher was a teacher, I would not have been reluctant. I am positive I could say the same for the other 17 year old youths I knew in high school and in the Air Force.

A young man now, when girls are not as repressed, might give it more thought and decide the possible hassle would not be worth it, but that would not have been the situation in 1956 and 1957.

ETA: Out of curiosity, how do you get off telling me how I would have acted when I was 17? You know almost nothing about me.

 

[sr71plt]

You know almost nothing about me.

Or much of anything else, for that matter, I think. She certainly doesn't have a clue about teenaged boys.