FOX News front page: New Black Panthers are at Philly polling sites!

Do you disagree with hate speech laws?

Or do you support them?

I disagree with them, which is consistent with why I reject your endorsement argument.

I get your questions but before I answer both of them, I also asked two questions in my post.....
 
When faced with the truth of themselves, most GB NeoCons will resort to name calling.

I mean... I told him I'd be okay with the the KKK monitoring polls (assuming they're doing everything legally) and he turns around and accuses me or being racists against white people. :confused:

I don't think he thought this through.
 
I mean... I told him I'd be okay with the the KKK monitoring polls (assuming they're doing everything legally) and he turns around and accuses me or being racists against white people. :confused:

I don't think he thought this through.

Have you ever noticed that a few won't think anything through, usually giving knee-jerk or "From the Rush Limbaugh" answers to everything?
 
Ha! Look at Luke adding insightful, thought provoking commentary like always. His grasp of any subject is immediately brought to light with his well thought out and intelligent commentary.

:rolleyes:

Your commentary on the subject sucks, jr. You don't like merc so you are ascribing a bullshit position to him.
 
Nothing about being white stops you from hating white people!

Yeah. I suppose a person could go around preaching the inherent inferiority of their own race. Sure. Maybe that's what I'm doing here. :D
 
When faced with the truth of themselves, most GB NeoCons will resort to name calling.

Have you ever noticed that a few won't think anything through, usually giving knee-jerk or "From the Rush Limbaugh" answers to everything?

What truth was I faced with? :rolleyes:

What defines me as a neo con, is it my dislike of the religious right, my support for a womans right to choose? :rolleyes:

How are any of my answers knee jerk or RL taling points?:rolleyes:

I like irony too
 
What truth was I faced with? :rolleyes:

What defines me as a neo con, is it my dislike of the religious right, my support for a womans right to choose? :rolleyes:

How are any of my answers knee jerk or RL taling points?:rolleyes:

I like irony too



The truth is the RW media (Fox News) is using one legally-authorized dude that NOBODY is complaining about to scare white people into voting for Republicans. If you wanted to make a legitimate complaint about someone completely abusing race you should point your finger straight at Fox News.

But instead you're here yammering away, telling some white guy he's racist against white guys.
 
UN poll-watchers 'amazed' US doesn't require ID's to vote... :rolleyes:
 
Tee Hee

Buncha KOOKS n LOONZ^^^^^:D

Now they will babble nonsense it hopes of changing the subject. But deep in their little bitty minds they get it. :cool:

Could you imagine the outrage and sanctimonious bullshit that would be flying if a KKK member was outside the polls? :eek:
 
I get your questions but before I answer both of them, I also asked two questions in my post.....

I answered.

Subjectively intimidated or not, as long as either the KKK guy or the NBP guy behave like other poll-watchers--they behave in an objectively reasonable manner--they get to participate just like any other citizen.
 
They are hanging out in black polling places, making sure that black voters AREN'T intimidated by racist groups like skinheads and the KKK.
 
Now they will babble nonsense it hopes of changing the subject. But deep in their little bitty minds they get it. :cool:

Nope, not changing the subject at all. But you immediately dropped your argument as soon as I highlighted its absurdity, didn't ya? :rolleyes:

Could you imagine the outrage and sanctimonious bullshit that would be flying if a KKK member was outside the polls? :eek:

It would be about the same as your sanctimonious bullshit.
 
Merc meet Point. Point, meet Merc

:cool:

I've been calling this story sanctimonious bullshit since the OP. Now after accusing me of being a racist and a white backer of the anti-white NBPP, you're saying you've been agreeing with me this whole time?
 
And here he is in this very thread accusing Merc of supposed racism, when he's actively quoting a racist shitstain that actually IS using racism.

Of course, the horse-blinders are on his flounder eyes to not directly quote the racist shitstain's racist posts, but association by proxy means...
 
I answered.

Subjectively intimidated or not, as long as either the KKK guy or the NBP guy behave like other poll-watchers--they behave in an objectively reasonable manner--they get to participate just like any other citizen.


This is in spite of an obvious point which VA kind of glides over: the KKK came into existence in order to deprive black people of their various newly won rights, including the right to vote. Needless to say, there's no history in the US of a black nationalist organization, or any other organization, working to prevent whites from casting a vote.
 
Now they will babble nonsense it hopes of changing the subject. But deep in their little bitty minds they get it. :cool:

Could you imagine the outrage and sanctimonious bullshit that would be flying if a KKK member was outside the polls? :eek:

hell

they call LONG LINES.....RACIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


:D
 
I've been calling this story sanctimonious bullshit since the OP. Now after accusing me of being a racist and a white backer of the anti-white NBPP, you're saying you've been agreeing with me this whole time?

If you are agreeing that you are a partisan hypocritical hack. Then yes. I agree with you 100%!
 
Yeah. I suppose a person could go around preaching the inherent inferiority of their own race. Sure. Maybe that's what I'm doing here. :D

You'll recall that last month that kbate redefined racism to include showing empathy towards any race.
 
Back
Top