M
miles
Guest
So how much of the scheming and corruption was incompetent? It looks to me like your theory implies that they're very competent at scheming and corruption.
Another brilliant post Phro.
Who's on first?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So how much of the scheming and corruption was incompetent? It looks to me like your theory implies that they're very competent at scheming and corruption.
The U6 is unchanged as we speak at 14.7%.
The rate allegedly fell to 7.8% in September. 100,000 jobs were created and 800,000 people found work. (Don't do the math).
Jesus must have had something to do with it! Unemployment has been above 8% for 43 straight months and three weeks before the election it suddenly drops substantially!
Who said there were no more miracles?
Which happens, uh, every month.
One reason the rate was a good deal lower this month is that they had underestimated the number of jobs added the previous two months, which is an interesting oversight considering dumbass Miles's conspiracy theory.
Just showing up the number for what it really is, knowing full well the hole the story blows into the ramparts of Fortress Bullshit that surrounds and protects Barack Obama, would draw out a squealing slobbering sycophant of sufficient size to insert himself into the gaping breach.![]()
Let's see....114,000 new jobs were created but 800,000 people were hired.
As The Fraud would say, do the math.
The unemployment rate is calculated through a separate survey — one of households rather than business establishments.
As The Fraud would say, know what the fuck you're looking at before you do the math.
Just sayin'
Considering the facts of the matter, you are clueless. 100,000 jobs a month are required to keep up with normal attrition. 250,000 jobs a month have to be created in order to really affect the unemployment number. Too get back to where we were we have to do this every month, month in month out, for at least three years.
Unlike you, I don't need a job.![]()
I don't need to, itto bitty one. I know the facts.
The fact is that the figure going from just above 8% to 7.8% isn't any kind of wild swing. But it crossed over a psychological number so you've given birth to another one of your paranoid conspiracy theories.
Why stop at 7.8 go ahead and say 7 are 6 it's a made up number anyway
I don't need to, itto bitty one. I know the facts.
It's only made up when it's good news for America. If unemployment ticked up to 8.4% you'd be here using it as proof of Obama's failings, wouldn't ya? Funny how you think you can have it both ways.
The numbers are a joke look what state added the most jobs Texas with almost half.
How many of the jobs are for the holiday season?
Obama's failings are all around one doesn't need see some made up numbers to see that fuck Steve wonder can see Obama's failures.
So, since you know the facts, then you know that the unemployment rate is calculated through a survey of household, and the number of jobs created are determined with a separate survey of business establishments. The household survey is a better measure of employment. The payroll survey covers only wage and salary workers on nonfarm payrolls. The household survey covers those individuals as well as agricultural workers, the self-employed, workers in private households, unpaid family workers, and workers on unpaid leave.
Given that the jobs survey THIS month significantly revised the jobs numbers upward over the past number of months, it shouldn't be a big surprise to see the household survey showing a higher number of people with jobs now than the number of new jobs being report for THIS month.
Revisions are purposefully ignored by Vette. Unless they're downward ones, those are very meaningful.
Fuck a duck, between jobs added in Sept and the July/Aug revisions you've now started dismissing jobs gains for at least six months of each year. Your rationalizations aren't ready for prime time yet bro.
Didn't read this entire thread so maybe someone else said it.
Isn't this just the simple fact that people who have finally run out of employment no longer count as unemployed?
Now we should have 2 stats.
One for those collecting unemployment and then one for people who have been out of work so longer they no longer report against the statistic.
It's also just starting to head into seasonal employment. All those people getting hired to work the "Halloween superstores" for thirty days then it will be November and retail will be hiring a slew of people, most of whom will be cut loose right after Christmas.
I'll tell you right now that it is so bad here in Rhode Island that unemployment had to lay people off because the state is so broke.
How's that for irony? Being laid off from unemployment.
Especially when we're at one of the highest rates in the country so good luck collecting your goddamn check.