Serious questions don't belong on Literotica, obviously there is no respect nor acceptance of such, and never will be. I thought better of you... till now.
And the ad hominem begins when invincible ignorance fails.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Serious questions don't belong on Literotica, obviously there is no respect nor acceptance of such, and never will be. I thought better of you... till now.
So, 19.
Does this mean my work won't be getting published in the New England Journal of Big Babyism and Whining Victimology?
When the subject is one you don't like or can't approach without seeming menial, attack the person?
No it just means that 99% of Literoticans are hypertolerant. 100% of those who did not bitch - 1% who did gives you the number. 4% margin of error in the polling data.
Jesus.
asshat posting if there ever was one... back to bed, honey!
The hostility toward conservatives makes for a far more hostile work environment, which is not the same thing as being less interested in academics as a career
I tried to help you out of the whole you were digging by showing where your 95% came from and this is the thank you I receive? Such ingratitude.
hole, sweety, hole... (check between legs for example)
(out of her league)
Back to the subject at hand... there is a conversation going, as the OP, that there is discrimination against conservatives in academia... and some articles have been posted as discussion material. I think, as one who has experienced this same kind of attack first hand, that it is a problem, and one day it will be addresses, as it diminishes us all when there are valuable contributions dismisssed due to agenda laden ignorance. Nuff said!
The idea that kids are converted to liberalism in college en masse, or that conservatives are being blackballed from American universities, is just more of your side's victim complex.
Oh noes. She changed the wording without editing the whole post!hole, sweety, hole... (check between legs for example)
(out of her league)
the facts of the matter betray the lies at the heart of your response... workplace hostility is a factor addressessed in most pursuits, and it needs more inspection and resolution in academia... it is a disgrace.
Oh noes. She changed the wording without editing the whole post!
You're simply not up to such a topic... better stick to the topics of fucking and sucking that you understand and for which you are an SME
Well known for her blowjobs, is our k.
addressed. (out of your league)
Nearly all my decisions to stop corresponding with individuals (or their alts) has been due to 'quote hacking', but I am discontinuing my correspondence with you for both your spoken support of the practice (and or disbelief in the existence of it in light of the fact) earlier in this exchange, but moreso for the fact that you are simply a dimmer light in the universe of discussion. All the posts I have gotten from you have simply been 'me too' posts for others, and adding an insult or too just to stay involved. If I wish to exchange ideas with others, I need to know those others have ideas to exchange. Just not enough to you of value to make for a reason to stay in touch....
Gosh, I wish I was in Mensa.
I thought it was rather well-known that Republicans were more likely to have university degrees, so if there's any secret indoctrination going on, it's not very effective. Typical liberal, amirite? Too busy murdering babies and getting gay married and levying tea tariffs to follow through on their own conspiracy plot.
You're right, though. Workplace hostility IS a bad thing, no matter what. I would hate to see a perfectly capable conservative professor feel bullied out of a job. Perhaps we should establish some sort of federal tax-dollar-funded department or enact a piece of legislation to protect the employment rights of people of all sorts of different ideological stripes and colours.
When we're equal, everyone wins! That's what conservatism is all about.
Nearly all my decisions to stop corresponding with individuals (or their alts) has been due to 'quote hacking', but I am discontinuing my correspondence with you for both your spoken support of the practice (and or disbelief in the existence of it in light of the fact) earlier in this exchange, but moreso for the fact that you are simply a dimmer light in the universe of discussion. All the posts I have gotten from you have simply been 'me too' posts for others, and adding an insult or too just to stay involved. If I wish to exchange ideas with others, I need to know those others have ideas to exchange. Just not enough to you of value to make for a reason to stay in touch....