Operations Fast & Furious

[koalabear]

Committee approves contempt resolution.

 

[busybody..]

Committee approves contempt resolution.

doesnt matter

1-No one at DOJ will prosecute

2-Senate will not vote for contempt




What was the vote? Were all DUMZ NIGGERIZED

 

[busybody..]

I see the vote

23....Freedom fighters for truth justice and the American way

17...NIGGERZ

I know

lets talk

K ROVE

 

[busybody..]

Nancy Pelosi Slams Holder Contempt Vote: “I Could Have Arrested Karl Rove … But I Didn’t”…




Wait, Karl Rove?


WASHINGTON — House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Wednesday that the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee is playing politics with its vote to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress, an action she said that even she didn’t seek as House Speaker when she thought someone was legitimately deserving of it.

“I could have arrested Karl Rove on any given day,” Pelosi said to laughter, during a sit-down with reporters. “I’m not kidding. There’s a prison here in the Capitol … If we had spotted him in the Capitol, we could have arrested him.”

Rove was senior advisor and deputy chief of staff to former President George W. Bush from 2001 to 2007.

Asked on what grounds she could have arrested Rove, Pelosi replied, “Oh, any number. But there were some specific ones for his being in contempt of Congress. But we didn’t.”

 

[busybody..]

The NIGGER is a fucking HIPPO CREEP but we all KNOW that


Of course, in the past Obama has taken a firm stance against the use of executive privilege:

2007, from an interview with CNN’s Larry King:


KING: “Do you favor executive privilege or should Karl Rove and others in that position be forced to testify before the House or Senate? (On Bush’s administration and executive privilege)

OBAMA: “Well, you know, I think we’ll — we’ll determine over the next several weeks how this administration responds to the very appropriate call by Patrick Leahy, the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, to have these individuals come in and testify. You know, there’s been a tendency on the part of this administration to — to try to hide behind executive privilege every time there’s something a little shaky that’s taking place. And I think, you know, the administration would be best served by coming clean on this. There doesn’t seem to be any national security issues involved with the U.S. attorney question. There doesn’t seem to be any justification for not offering up some clear, plausible rationale for why these — these U.S. attorneys were targeted when, by all assessments, they were doing an outstanding job. I think the American people deserve to know what was going on there.”

On taking office in 2009, President Obama called attention to the issue again, issuing a transparency memo that ordered executive agencies to operate with a strong “presumption in favor of disclosure” and called for a “national commitment” to open government. He also repealed a Bush administration executive order that expanded the practice of executive privilege, and made a show of reversing a Bush administration policy on answering Freedom of Information Act requests he said was too restrictive.


“For a long time now there’s been too much secrecy in this city,” Mr. Obama said at a swearing-in ceremony for senior officials at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, adjacent to the White House. He added, “Transparency and rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency.”

So why has President Obama chosen to utilize executive privilege now? Does the move imply, as House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) speculated, that “White House officials were either involved in the Fast and Furious operation or the cover-up that followed”? Is there, in the words of then-senator Obama, “something a little shaky that’s taking place”?

 

[busybody..]

Hussein Dick Soetoro


http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQEQs6nkynfiv_8coxM6Kvuv-wECzMME4y_ZMLSRTGnAmSvz4Xj

 

[busybody..]

Nix Hussein Dick Soetoro

http://www.moonbattery.com/fast-and-furious-coverup-nixon-obama.jpg

 

[unregistered]

 

[bra_man69]

So was open and transparent a misspeaking

 

[busybody..]

He is OPEN and TRANSPARENT

He says

FUCK YOU, YOU AINT GETTIN SHIT

and he means it!

how much more OPEN and TRAN PARENT can you be

 

[bra_man69]

He is OPEN and TRANSPARENT

He says

FUCK YOU, YOU AINT GETTIN SHIT

and he means it!

how much more OPEN and TRAN PARENT can you be

Forgot don't ask him about it

 

[NeverEndingMe]

holder and obama need to be cell mates in prison

 

[unregistered]

 

[bra_man69]

Here in the hinterlands it's often referred to as a bald faced lie.

The other night kingofidiots posted a c&p it said when obama said 57 states wasn't a lie it was misspeaking.

Know how libs gotta come up with new ways to spin things

Lie= misspeaking
War on terror = over seas contingency plan
Terrorist = work place violence

 

[unregistered]

 

[bra_man69]

Obama also said he had one more to go, so he's doubly misinformed.

After his next round of golf

 

[busybody..]

If the GUBMINT can take R Clemons to Court fro LYING

Will they do the same for NIGGERCOWARDHOLDER?

 

[unregistered]

 

[busybody..]

LAWS ARE FOR WHITE PEOPLE

 

[bra_man69]

Holder in contempt of Oversight Committee.

Democrats vote against America, against Brian Terry's family, and against the rule of law.

If the ends justified the means with them it's ok.
I want know who was thinking why this is a great ideal let's do this.
The tapes of that gun store owner needs to be played on every news cast intel answers come about.

 

[koalabear]

If the ends justified the means with them it's ok.
I want know who was thinking why this is a great ideal let's do this.
The tapes of that gun store owner needs to be played on every news cast intel answers come about.

What's wrong with a little collateral damage, when you are trying to do away with the 2nd.

 

[bra_man69]

What's wrong with a little collateral damage, when you are trying to do away with the 2nd.

Just a few people but think of all the people we can save and the streets be safer

 

[Colonel Hogan]

2-Senate will not vote for contempt

Senate action is not required. Passage by the House is sufficient to establish that the crime of Congressional contempt has occurred.

If Holder fails to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate and prosecute that crime, then he sets himself up for impeachment if the House has the fortitude to take the issue all the way regardless of the Senate's likelihood to acquit.

 

[coachdb18]

Holder in contempt of Oversight Committee.

Democrats vote against America, against Brian Terry's family, and against the rule of law.

Well, at least now when he keeps coming back over and over again to spin his tales of truthless testimony about his efforts to undermine the Constitution, the little sign in front of him can now read 'The DisHonorable Mr. Eric Holder'

 

[koalabear]

Terry's family issued a statement Wednesday that called for all of the documents sought by the committee to be turned over.

"Our son lost his life protecting this nation, and it is very disappointing that we are now faced with an administration that seems more concerned with protecting themselves rather than revealing the truth behind Operation Fast and Furious," the statement said.

Cummings and other Democrats said political motivations are at play.