U
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The OP has drifted so far into senility that he can't even form an opinion on his own C&P thread.
The OP has drifted so far into senility that he can't even form an opinion on his own C&P thread.
Are you all actually under the impression that Obama is the first president who has ever criticized the Supreme Court?
Are you all actually under the impression that Obama is the first president who has ever criticized the Supreme Court?
His opinion is obvious enough.
And his thread was informative, as well.
though i think the president's comments were less than well-considered, i can't help but chuckle at how thin-skinned the fifth circuit was.
who knew that the president's comments to the press would be considered legal argument by the court?![]()
though i think the president's comments were less than well-considered, i can't help but chuckle at how thin-skinned the fifth circuit was.
who knew that the president's comments to the press would be considered legal argument by the court?![]()
Who knew a Professor of Constitutional law would have forgotten Marbury v Madison?![]()
Just because he now only utilizes the MeeMie chicken shit method of posting C&Ps without his own opinion, doesn't make anything obvious other than he is now a mindless drone, much like yourself.
Damn, you're getting to be a quick study.
How valid would stare decisis be in the matter of say, Dred Scott?
or some of the early affirmative action cases, for that matter.
but, depending on the breadth of its opinion, the court stands to unravel a lot to commerce clause precedent.
if so, it needs to proudly wear the mantle of an activist court.
add a little objectivity to your bag.