College Students Demand We Pay Them to Have Constant Sex With Each Other

[Ishmael]

Of course Obama doesn't care Christy ... it's just his masterful blend of hyperbole and horseshit.
The Fluke woman, or whatever her name is ... Law Student at the Hoya school, is howerver in the process of getting rich. Anyone who doesn't realize this is extraordinarily stupid.

As to the origin of his birth; at this point, who cares.

Tuition at GWU-Law is $74,400/yr today, and she wants someone else to pay for her pleasure. Or is it that she's just an animal and can't help her self? Hard to argue it both ways, but she's damn sure trying.

Ishmael

 

[miles]

Why would Obama care how many babies a college student has?

Please tell me you aren't serious.

 

[busybody..]

Tuition at GWU-Law is $74,400/yr today, and she wants someone else to pay for her pleasure. Or is it that she's just an animal and can't help her self? Hard to argue it both ways, but she's damn sure trying.

Ishmael

She is a HERO to the LEFT

what she really is

IS A WHORE

 

[busybody..]

Shocked? WHY ARE YOU SCHOCKED

YOU ARE A SLUT!


Woman called 'slut' by Limbaugh is 'stunned, outraged'





By Halimah Abdullah



The ongoing debate over birth control took a particularly nasty turn recently when conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh called Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke a “slut” and “prostitute” for speaking out about the issue.

Fluke, a birth control activist, spoke with TODAY’s Matt Lauer about Limbaugh’s comments and the failure of a GOP-sponsored amendment that would have allowed employers at religious institutions to opt out of providing contraception in health plans.

Fluke told Lauer that she expected some backlash, especially from someone like Limbaugh. Still, the comments stung — especially since they were made on the first day of Women’s History Month.



“I think my reaction was the reaction a lot of women have had historically when they’ve been called these types of names: Initially to be stunned by it, and then to quickly feel outraged and very upset,” she told Lauer.

Limbaugh’s comments came on the heels of heated congressional debate over the so-called “Blunt Amendment,” a measure that ultimately failed in the Senate and would have nixed the Obama administration’s mandate on contraception. Lawmakers evoked Fluke’s name during the debate as someone who testified during an unofficial democratic committee hearing headed by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., about how a friend needed birth control to shrink ovarian cysts and help preserve her fertility.

Fluke had been previously blocked from testifying before a Republican-led, all-male congressional panel on contraception and religious freedom.

Limbaugh said Fluke was just trying to promote casual sex.

 

[miles]

Limbaugh's stupid remarks take nothing away from the fact that this "unofficial Congressional hearing" is nothing but a sham.

The Obama regime never ceases to amaze me.

 

[busybody..]

his remarks werent stupid at all

they were BULLSEYE!

 

[busybody..]

Meanwhile

The WHORE

Becomes a BIGGER WHORE!



Sandra Fluke’s Appearance Is No Fluke







For me the interesting part of the story is the ever-evolving “coed”. I put that in quotes because in the beginning she was described as a Georgetown law student. It was then revealed that prior to attending Georgetown she was an active women’s right advocate. In one of her first interviews she is quoted as talking about how she reviewed Georgetown’s insurance policy prior to committing to attend, and seeing that it didn’t cover contraceptive services, she decided to attend with the express purpose of battling this policy. During this time, she was described as a 23-year-old coed. Magically, at the same time Congress is debating the forced coverage of contraception, she appears and is even brought to Capitol Hill to testify. This morning, in an interview with Matt Lauer on the Today show, it was revealed that she is 30 years old, NOT the 23 that had been reported all along.

In other words, folks, you are being played. She has been an activist all along and the Dems were just waiting for the appropriate time to play her.

While she is described as a “third year law student” they always fail to mention that she is also the past president of Law Students for Reproductive Justice.

July 30 2011


Does your campus’s LSRJ chapter face opposition in regard to facilitating a comprehensive conversation about reproductive justice? Well mine definitely does! While my campus has a mix of people with different backgrounds, and a rich liberal arts community, the Midwest doesn’t exactly scream bleeding liberal. Some LSRJ chapters at conservative campuses face opposition in the form of other, more conservative, student run organizations; some face it from their administrations, and others from their peers, or the community in general. Whatever the opposition is, it can be incredibly frustrating and disheartening.

The question is, how do we combat this conservative opposition and oppression, in order to facilitate a discussion and educate others about the RJ movement? I am obviously not alone in facing these problems, as Sandra Fluke of Georgetown lead a packed room in a discussion on this question at the first Issue Caucus that I attended at the Leadership Institute, LSRJ’s national conference at Berkeley.

While no solution was definitively reached, and I personally don’t begin to have the “right” answer, I was really charged by the discussion and feel many great ideas were presented. Some campus chapters decided to take an adversarial approach, feeling it important to use those “scary” words the opposition fears.

Further background research on Ms Fluke reveals that she got her start in government in New York in 2009.


Sandra Fluke’s professional background in domestic violence and human trafficking began with Sanctuary for Families in New York City. There, she launched the agency’s pilot Program Evaluation Initiative. While at Sanctuary, she co-founded the New York Statewide Coalition for Fair Access to Family Court, which after a twenty-year stalemate, successfully advocated for legislation granting access to civil orders of protection for unmarried victims of domestic violence, including LGBTQ victims and teens. Sandra was also a member of the Manhattan Borough President’s Taskforce on Domestic Violence and numerous other New York City and New York State coalitions that successfully advocated for policy improvements impacting victims of domestic violence.

As the 2010 recipient of the Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles Fran Kandel Public Interest Grant, she researched, wrote, and produced an instructional film on how to apply for a domestic violence restraining order in pro per. She has also interned with the Coalition to Abolish Slavery & Trafficking; Polaris Project; Neighborhood Legal Services of Los Angeles County; Break the Cycle; the Domestic Violence Legal Empowerment and Appeals Project; NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund; Crime Victim and Sexual Assault Services; and the Human Services Coalition of Tompkins County.

Through Georgetown’s clinic programs, Sandra has proposed legislation based on fact-finding in Kenya regarding child trafficking for domestic work, and has represented victims of domestic violence in protection order cases. Sandra is the Development Editor of the Journal of Gender and the Law, and served as the President of Law Students for Reproductive Justice, and the Vice President of the Women’s Legal Alliance. In her first year, she also co-founded a campus committee addressing human trafficking. Cornell University awarded her a B. S. in Policy Analysis & Management, as well as Feminist, Gender, & Sexuality Studies in 2003.

My only question is, how does someone go from being a champion of domestic violence issues to an expert of women’s reproductive health issues?

 

[busybody..]

Limbaugh's stupid remarks take nothing away from the fact that this "unofficial Congressional hearing" is nothing but a sham.

The Obama regime never ceases to amaze me.

where were you when Whitman was called a WHORE?

and NOW in fact said YES, SHE IS A WHORE!

where were you when a CONGRESSMAN called a female who was testifying in front of CONGRESS a WHORE?

NOWHERE!

THE LIBZ SAID NOTHING and in fact DOUBLE DOWN ON TEH COMMENTS

 

[cum2ut]

This is so stupid.....my insurance never paid for my medically needed birth control pills, yet I didn't have a problem paying for it. I didn't have sex, but needed them to regulate my periods, & never paid more than $100 a year for my pills. I get a 3 month supply @ Walmart for $12. Tjere is no way it costs $3000 a year for them.

 

[miles]

where were you when Whitman was called a WHORE?

and NOW in fact said YES, SHE IS A WHORE!

where were you when a CONGRESSMAN called a female who was testifying in front of CONGRESS a WHORE?

NOWHERE!

THE LIBZ SAID NOTHING and in fact DOUBLE DOWN ON TEH COMMENTS

Did we forget our meds today?

You're deflecting. We're talking about Limbaugh, remember?

 

[busybody..]

Did we forget our meds today?

You're deflecting. We're talking about Limbaugh, remember?

What you are saying

Is JUAN side can say and do anything

The other is called STUPID for telling it like it is!



She is in effect a WHORE!

and

SLUT

 

[miles]

What you are saying

Is JUAN side can say and do anything

The other is called STUPID for telling it like it is!



She is in effect a WHORE!

and

SLUT

Dude, don't play the Oreo game and tell me what I said. Did I say it was okay for either "side" to say that crap? I didn't, did I?

You need a diversion.

 

[busybody..]

What RL said was 100% correct

And

Hopefully he tells anyone that disagrees

FUCKOFF!

 

[miles]

What RL said was 100% correct

And

Hopefully he tells anyone that disagrees

FUCKOFF!

LMAO!

You sound like a Liberal who makes things up, denies it, deflects, then starts calling names.

Face it: you lied and don't have the balls to admit it.

Large fonts won't change that.

 

[pornstarwannabe]

You're already paying that insane amount for school, and now you're supposed to shell out an extra $45-$150 a month for medication? That's fucking crazy. What don't you understand about that?

But I could easily rearrange your words, and I will, to state this:
You're already paying that insane amount for school ($24K per semester), so what's an extra $45-$150 a month for medication on top of tat? Chump Change as the Prez calls it.

 

[pornstarwannabe]

But I could easily rearrange your words, and I will, to state this:
You're already paying that insane amount for school ($24K per semester), so what's an extra $45-$150 a month for medication on top of tat? Chump Change as the Prez calls it.

I have to amend my statement:
But I could easily rearrange your words, and I will, to state this:
You're already paying that insane amount for school ($24K per semester), so what's an extra $9 a month (from target with a prescription) for medication on top of that? Chump Change as the Prez calls it.

Link to evidence.

 

[busybody..]

SO LEFTIST FLUKE IS A SLUT AND RIGHTIST PALIN IS A CUNT?

OBAMA APPROVES OF CALLING RIGHTIST PALIN A CUNT.

HOWEVER HE SAYS FLUKE IS NO LEFTIST SLUT....

BEING A COMMUNIST WHORE HE SHOULD KNOW!


Bill Maher Calls Sarah Palin a "****" a Week After Calling Palin a "Dumb ****"

Monday, March 28, 2011 | Kristinn

A week after calling former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin a "dumb t***" vulgar insult for women, comedian Bill Maher went all the way and called Palin the c-word, adding, "There's just no other word for her."

The Dallas Voice (The Premier Media Source for LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transexual) Texas) reporting on Maher's appearance Sunday night at the Winnspear Opera House Sunday night, cheered Maher using the crude sexist slur against the 2008 Republican party vice presidential nominee as an act of "fearlessness":

It’s that fearlessness — he acknowledged that some people would probably be uncomfortable with some of his remarks about religion, not to mention calling Sarah Palin a “c***” (“there’s just no other word for her”) — that makes Maher the most dangerous person in comedy.

The audience at the Winnspear was descibed by the Voice as "largely gay (and certainly gay-friendly)", which might explain Maher's fearlessness in attacking a conservative, Christian, married mother of five in the most vulgar, personal and sexist way.

When Maher was first being criticized for calling Palin the t-word, Noel Sheppard at Newsbusters asked:

Is the universal media hatred for this woman so pervasive that it's now acceptable for a man to call her that?

Can the dreaded C-word be far behind?

Sadly, it didn't take long for Sheppard to be proven right.

Last month, Slate Magazine was caught slyly calling Palin the c-word in a headline. Slate's editor apologized after being being called out by Big Journalism.

 

[Saint Peter]

Stop spitting on us!

 

[christy1989]

Yes Miles just kidding.

Rush called backies!! So she's not a slut, because Rush never lies!!

Also just FYI...my insurance pays for birth control pills. Also they pay for 5 Viagra pills every month. I wonder who figured out that Viagra would only be necessary 5 times a month?

 

[busybody..]

Irony Alert! Leftist Women Now Overjoyed That Government IS in Their Bodies


How ironic it is that all those women who bought bumper-stickers from the leftwing National Organization of Women are now salivating at the thought of free oral contraceptives, compliments of the Obama administration’s… laws. I guess it depends whose laws they like best. How convenient to have such a bone-headedly flexible philosophy.



In one of his most devastating — and hilarious — columns ever, author, blogger and deep-thinker- with-a-puckish-wit Ira Stoll devastates the poster child of free birth control pills, Georgetown University law student and Obama tool, Sandra Fluke. Writing in The New York Sun, Mr. Stoll parries her argument that $1,000 per year during three years of law school is too much for poor students to pay for their birth control “needs” (emphasis added


Here are a few ways Ms. Fluke and her friends might get their contraceptive costs down below that $3,000 level:
•They could have men pay half. Modern men do half the parenting work or pay at least half the child support. Why shouldn’t men pay for half of the contraceptive costs?
• Ms. Fluke and her friends could use condoms instead of prescription birth control pills. One Georgetown student group reportedly handed out 4,500 “free” condoms during one recent semester. Or the law students could buy condoms online at $40.25 for a package of 100. At about 40 cents a condom, the Georgetown students could have sex twice a day, 365 days a year, for all three years of law school, for just $881 dollars.
•Ms. Fluke and her friends could go to Walmart or Target, whose lists of inexpensive drugs include the oral contraceptive Tri-Sprintec priced at $4 for a 28-day supply. Total cost, assuming continuous use for three full years (including the summer after graduating law school or before starting): about $150.

As I argue elsewhere today, the idea that all insured Americans should pay $10-20 co-payments for their own medications but should be forced to subsidize the recreational sex of anyone else is truly repugnant. When you were young, did you ever expect anyone else to pay for your condoms or spermicidal jelly to place in the diaphragm you bought with your own money? I didn’t think so. No, to think otherwise, you’d have to hold, as does Ms. Fluke, a B.S. (golly, I wonder what that stands for?) in Policy Analysis & Management and Feminist, Gender, & Sexuality Studies.

And you thought that no one could do anything useful with a major like that. Au contraire, she’s already well over her Warholian fifteen minutes of fame. Why do I foresee a godawful Sandra Fluke tell-all book coming to your nearest Barnes & Noble’s “Current Events” table all too soon? Can a permanent slot on “Anderson 360″ be beyond her reach? Gloria Borger, call your agent. Now.

Returning to Mr. Stoll, he concludes his trenchant analysis with these questions that he says “go right to the heart of ObamaCare”:


Why is the president getting involved in setting prices for prescription drugs in the first place? Where in the Constitution does he get that power? Why should people past reproductive age who are paying copayments for their heart or arthritis medication be paying taxes to subsidize free prescription contraceptives for law students?

Why, indeed? And to think these same leftist women have all those posters in their attics and basements with messages such as this one:

http://pjmedia.com/tatler/files/2012/03/If-I-wanted-the-givernbment-in-my-womb3-300x202.jpg

Guess they’re probably saving them for the Romney administration.