Wobnoid
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2011
- Posts
- 1,047
Always interesting to read through an older thread and come upon a series of
'd posts - where often, a once contributor has attempted to just vanish... A brigade of
s hold the places but not the context of what was. Armies of
s populate the back rooms of Lit. Just as often though, the 'vanish' is but varnish. Other's quotes then of the redacted posts show who had once been here and what they had once said. Elusive, definitive vapour trails in a cloud chamber remain. Odd fragments define who and what one was. If at some point you were quotable, chances are, you can never really leave.
Quoting another's post can be homage or referential towards a greater point. "Quoted for Posterity" becomes the ultimate defense against a poster's self editing and is often applied as a weapon. Both have left this odd legacy with nearly forgotten names in mostly forgotten battles leaving barely perceptible stories of posters who once were.... more than
s?
The forensics are interesting. That's all. To stumble upon a legion of frogs - to catch glimpses of once prolifics - to misremember their stories and downfalls(?) to
dom....
In the current context, a great crafty redaction (no doubt soon to
dom) is in process. In time, a great deal of the legacy will be obscure. I was tempted to dredge up a legion or two of the once luminary to pique at our innate prurience but uhhh... well?



Quoting another's post can be homage or referential towards a greater point. "Quoted for Posterity" becomes the ultimate defense against a poster's self editing and is often applied as a weapon. Both have left this odd legacy with nearly forgotten names in mostly forgotten battles leaving barely perceptible stories of posters who once were.... more than

The forensics are interesting. That's all. To stumble upon a legion of frogs - to catch glimpses of once prolifics - to misremember their stories and downfalls(?) to

In the current context, a great crafty redaction (no doubt soon to
