Obama Accused Of Sexual Harassment

MeeMie

No Spam Here
Joined
Jun 1, 2005
Posts
7,328
Obama Accused Of Sexual Harassment While at Harvard Law Review

During Barack Obama’s tenure as the president of the Harvard Law Review in the late 1980s, at least two male student editors complained to colleagues and senior university officials about inappropriate behavior by Obama, ultimately leaving their positions at the journal.

The men complained of sexually suggestive behavior by Obama that made them angry and uncomfortable, the sources said, and they signed agreements with the university that gave them financial payouts to leave the journal. The agreements also included language that bars the men from talking about their departures.

In a series of comments over the past 10 days, Obama and his administration repeatedly declined to respond directly about whether he ever faced allegations of sexual harassment at the journal. They have also declined to address questions about specific reporting confirming that there were financial settlements in two cases in which men leveled complaints.

White House spokesman Jay Carney said the president indicated to White House staff that he was “vaguely familiar” with the charges and that the university’s general counsel had resolved the matter.

Obama was president of the Harvard Law Review from late-1988 to mid-1989. THE KANSAS CITIAN learned of the allegations against him, and over the course of several weeks, has put together accounts of what happened by talking to a lengthy roster of former university officials, current and past students and others familiar with the workings of the journal at the time Obama was there.

In one case, documentation describing the allegations showed that the university formally resolved the matter. Both men received separation packages that were in the five-figure range.

On the details of Obama’s allegedly inappropriate behavior with the two men, a half-dozen sources shedding light on different aspects of the complaints.

The sources — including the recollections of close associates and other documentation — describe episodes that left the men upset and offended. These incidents include conversations allegedly filled with innuendo or personal questions of a sexually suggestive nature, taking place at hotels during conferences, at other officially sanctioned journal events and at the journal’s offices. There were also descriptions of physical gestures that were not overtly sexual but that made men who experienced or witnessed them uncomfortable and that they regarded as improper in a professional relationship.

UPDATE: Third man comes forward to AP.

A third former editor says he considered filing a workplace complaint over what he considered aggressive and unwanted behavior by Barack Obama when he worked under the president in the 1991 at the University of Chicago. He says the behavior included a private invitation to his apartment.

He worked for the University of Chicago when he was a Visiting Law and Government Fellow. He told The Associated Press that Obama made sexually suggestive remarks or gestures about the same time that the two editors of the Harvard Law Review had settled separate harassment complaints against him. The employee described situations in which he said Obama told him he had confided to colleagues how attractive he was and invited him to his apartment outside work. He spoke on condition of anonymity, saying he feared retaliation. The White House declined to comment.





I wonder if the main stream media would give these sexual accusations about Obama as much press and air time as they did Cain ....



they're about as true as the others.




. . .
 
Last edited:
Obama Accused Of Sexual Harassment While at Harvard Law Review

During Barack Obama’s tenure as the president of the Harvard Law Review in the late 1980s, at least two male student editors complained to colleagues and senior university officials about inappropriate behavior by Obama, ultimately leaving their positions at the journal.

The men complained of sexually suggestive behavior by Obama that made them angry and uncomfortable, the sources said, and they signed agreements with the university that gave them financial payouts to leave the journal. The agreements also included language that bars the men from talking about their departures.

In a series of comments over the past 10 days, Obama and his administration repeatedly declined to respond directly about whether he ever faced allegations of sexual harassment at the journal. They have also declined to address questions about specific reporting confirming that there were financial settlements in two cases in which men leveled complaints.

White House spokesman Jay Carney told THE KANSAS CITIAN the president indicated to White House staff that he was “vaguely familiar” with the charges and that the university’s general counsel had resolved the matter.

Obama was president of the Harvard Law Review from late-1988 to mid-1989. THE KANSAS CITIAN learned of the allegations against him, and over the course of several weeks, has put together accounts of what happened by talking to a lengthy roster of former university officials, current and past students and others familiar with the workings of the journal at the time Obama was there.

In one case, THE KANSAS CITIAN has seen documentation describing the allegations and showing that the university formally resolved the matter. Both men received separation packages that were in the five-figure range.

On the details of Obama’s allegedly inappropriate behavior with the two men, THE KANSAS CITIAN has a half-dozen sources shedding light on different aspects of the complaints.

The sources — including the recollections of close associates and other documentation — describe episodes that left the men upset and offended. These incidents include conversations allegedly filled with innuendo or personal questions of a sexually suggestive nature, taking place at hotels during conferences, at other officially sanctioned journal events and at the journal’s offices. There were also descriptions of physical gestures that were not overtly sexual but that made men who experienced or witnessed them uncomfortable and that they regarded as improper in a professional relationship.

UPDATE: Third man comes forward to AP.

A third former editor says he considered filing a workplace complaint over what he considered aggressive and unwanted behavior by Barack Obama when he worked under the president in the 1991 at the University of Chicago. He says the behavior included a private invitation to his apartment.

He worked for the University of Chicago when he was a Visiting Law and Government Fellow. He told The Associated Press that Obama made sexually suggestive remarks or gestures about the same time that the two editors of the Harvard Law Review had settled separate harassment complaints against him. The employee described situations in which he said Obama told him he had confided to colleagues how attractive he was and invited him to his apartment outside work. He spoke on condition of anonymity, saying he feared retaliation. The White House declined to comment.





I wonder if the main stream media will give these sexual accusations about Obama as much press and air time as they did Cain ....

Well, there's no "smoking gun" proof that anything really happened but, under the circumstances, it might hurt the Democrats' ability to defeat the GOP nominee, so Obama should put his campaign for re-election on suspension.

:D
 
Maybe if you provided a link we would not think you fabricated this stupidity.
 
Well, there's no "smoking gun" proof that anything really happened but, under the circumstances, it might hurt the Democrats' ability to defeat the GOP nominee, so Obama should put his campaign for re-election on suspension.

:D



Wouldn't that be a dream come true!

Might even be worth paying a few liars to swear by their charges.
 
Wouldn't that be a dream come true!

Might even be worth paying a few liars to swear by their charges.

Ah -hem! We don't call them "paid liars."
That's politically incorrect.
We call them MSNBC and AP "confidential sources."

;)
 
It was a parody ... of the persecution of Cain.

See how that works? ... or doesn't ever materialize (in Obama's case)
 
ONCE YOU GO CONSERVATIVE BLACK, YOU BETTER WATCH YOUR BACK



With the mainstream media giddily reporting on an alleged affair involving Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain, how long can it be before they break the news that their 2004 vice presidential candidate conceived a "love child" with his mistress, Rielle Hunter?

The left is trying to destroy Cain with a miasma of hazy accusations leveled by three troubled women. Considered individually, the accusations are utterly unbelievable. They are even less credible taken together. This is how liberals destroy a man, out of nothing.

After the first round of baseless accusations against Cain, an endless stream of pundits rolled out the cliche -- as if it were the height of originality -- "This isn't he said-she said; it's he-said, she-said, she-said, she-said, she–said."

Au contraire: We had two "shes" and only one "said."

Remember? Only two women were willing to give their names. And as soon as they did, we discovered that they were highly suspicious accusers with nothing more than their personal honor to support the allegations. Only one of the two would even say what Cain allegedly did.

The first one was Sharon Bialek, who claimed that Cain grabbed her crotch in a car.

Then we found out Bialek was in constant financial trouble, had been involved in a paternity lawsuit, was known as a "gold digger," had a string of debts and had twice filed for personal bankruptcy. Also, she admitted she knew Obama's dirty tricks specialist, David Axelrod, from living in the same building with him.

Her personal history is relevant because she produced no evidence. We had to take her word. (Which was not helped by seeing her standing with Gloria Allred.)

The second one, Karen Kraushaar, made unspecified allegations of a "hostile environment" when she was working for Cain, but refuses to say what those allegations were. This despite the fact that the National Restaurant Association waived her confidentiality agreement, thus allowing her to go public.

That's one "she," but no "said."

Cain said he had once told Kraushaar she was as tall as his wife -- which would be one of the more worthy sexual harassment claims settled by an American company in recent years.

Why won't she say? We're not talking about rape. Kraushaar can't say, "I don't want to relive being told I was the same height as his wife!" With all the nonsense that passes for a "hostile environment," either Kraushaar tells us what Cain allegedly did, or her blind accusation is worth less than nothing.

As if that weren't enough, then it turned out that Kraushaar had also filed a complaint at her next job just three years later, charging that a manager had circulated a sexually explicit joke email comparing computers to men and women. She demanded a raise and the right to work at home.

Maybe Kraushaar is the most unlucky woman in the world. But the simpler explanation is that she is not a credible witness on the workplace atmosphere.

And now we have Ginger White stepping forward to claim that she had a 13-year affair with Cain. Cain admits he was friends with White, but he categorically, adamantly denies having an affair with her.

White has the whole combo-platter of questionable accuser attributes: She's another financially troubled, twice-divorced, unemployed single mother, who has claimed sexual harassment in the past, declared bankruptcy once, was accused of stalking and had a libel judgment entered against her just this year. So far in 2011, she's had nine liens put on her property.

But we're supposed to ignore all of that because she's the third woman of questionable character to make an implausible allegation. Liberals say there's a pattern, but the only pattern is of their making far-fetched accusations of a sexual nature against Cain.

White's proof that she had a 13-year affair is that she has two of Cain's books signed by him -- one with the incriminating inscription, "Friends are forever! Everything else is a bonus," and the other, "Miss G, you have already made a 'big difference!' Stay focused as you pursue your next destination." (I know -- filthy!)

If that's proof of an affair, I've had thousands of them without even realizing it.

Also, White produced evidence that Cain had texted or called her cell phone 61 times during four non-consecutive months -- but did not reveal what those texts said. ("Would you please return my lawn mower?")

Again, if that's proof of an affair, I'm having hundreds of them at this very moment.

This is the sort of evidence you get with an actual sexual predator: Bill Clinton's accusers had gifts, taped phone conversations with him and a semen-stained dress.

Gennifer Flowers produced taped telephone calls with Clinton totaling thousands of words between them, with him counseling her on how to deny their affair: "If they ever hit you with it, just say no, and go on. There's nothing they can do ... But when they -- if somebody contacts you, I need to know ... All you got to do is deny it."

Paula Jones had multiple same-day witnesses -- including the state troopers who worked for Clinton and had already told the press about a "Paula" they brought to Clinton's hotel room. And that was for a single incident.

Monica Lewinsky had lots of gifts from Clinton, including a hat pin, two brooches, a marble bear figurine, a T-shirt from Martha's Vineyard and Walt Whitman's "Leaves of Grass," all of which she mysteriously placed with Clinton's secretary, Betty Currie, during the investigation, as well as a semen-stained dress, which Monica kept.

Ginger White claims she had a 13-year affair with Cain -- and all she has are two books with inscriptions that could have been written to an auto mechanic who waited in line at a Cain book signing. Even her business partner during the alleged affair says White never mentioned Cain's name.

These women are like triple-A ball players with the stats being: number of bankruptcies, smallest bank account, number of liens, most false claims, number of children out of wedlock, degrees of separation from David Axelrod, total trips to human resources and so on.

That wouldn't be dispositive -- except for the fact that their only evidence is their word.

But this is how liberals dirty you up when they've got nothing: They launch a series of false accusations, knowing that Americans with busy lives won't follow each story to the end and notice that they were all blind alleys.

The liberal media is an old story, but it's still a big story when it comes to creating the impression of scandal out of thin air.

Most people say, "Where there's smoke, there's fire." I say, "Where there's smoke around a conservative, there are journalists furiously rubbing two sticks together."

COPYRIGHT 2011 ANN COULTER
 
Only conservative black men get lambasted by the media for sexual misconduct. If it is a liberal they get a pass.
 
The hilarious part is how some crazy persons continue to insist that it was liberals that went after Cain. Instead of the people he was fucking up the election chances for.
 
Every night Newt is pulling his Georgian cock in glee as the pretenders all fall down around him.
 
Well, there's no "smoking gun" proof that anything really happened but, under the circumstances, it might hurt the Democrats' ability to defeat the GOP nominee, so Obama should put his campaign for re-election on suspension.

:D

Whatever happened to those guys that came forward and said that they had gay sex with obama?

That went quiet quickly as well.
 
Only conservative black men get lambasted by the media for sexual misconduct. If it is a liberal they get a pass.

right.. because Cain has been accused of being a Kenyan, Communist, Muslim, Marxist, Fascist, extremist Christian with no birth certificate


Obama would never have to suffer that kind of indignity
 
Maybe if you provided a link we would not think you fabricated this stupidity.

Word for word on about a zillion rw blog sites. Can't find where it originated.

It's a hoax. It's supposed to be some kind of commentary on the Herman Cain thing, but I have no idea what. All the blogs that picked it up as if it's truth apparently don't either. Anyway, it's just a rewrite of the Herman Cain stories in Politico as if they are about Obama, with a couple of small changes to make them pertinent.

It originated here: http://thekansascitian.blogspot.com/2011/11/barack-obama-accused-by-two-men-of.html

The two links that claim to be to sourced information about the "editors" and new details to the AP are to two Politico stories about Cain, http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/67194.html#ixzz1cefb1NQS and http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1111/67476.html.

Interesting they chose gay advances for Obama; the more direct spoof would have been female editors. Pop pyschologists, what's your take?
 
Last edited:
It's a hoax. ...


WOW! What a detective!

That was mentioned in post #8 already ... it is meant to be a parody on the persecution of Herman Cain compared to Obama's free pass.

You haven't heard about Obama's homosexual tendencies?

MAN! You really should widen your information highway.
 
WOW! What a detective!

That was mentioned in post #8 already ... it is meant to be a parody on the persecution of Herman Cain compared to Obama's free pass.

You haven't heard about Obama's homosexual tendencies?

MAN! You really should widen your information highway.


You're complaining that the media haven't given proper coverage to things that you concede never actually happened?

I guess I see your point. I can't remember the last time I saw a MSM story about the tapir that won the Daytona 500, and frankly it's pissing me off.
 
MeeMie said:
I wish I'd gone to college. I'm so self-conscious about not having a decent education that it kills me inside.

We know.
 
right.. because Cain has been accused of being a Kenyan, Communist, Muslim, Marxist, Fascist, extremist Christian with no birth certificate


Obama would never have to suffer that kind of indignity

That is because Obama is a Kenyan. Keep up or move along.
 
Back
Top